Syria: Cameron says use of chemical weapons 'cannot stand'


David Cameron: "Any response would have to be legal, proportionate and deter future use of chemical weapons"

David Cameron has said the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government is "morally indefensible" after he recalled Parliament to discuss responses to the crisis.

The prime minister said the world could "not stand idly by" in the face of the "massive use" of banned weapons.

But any military action would have to be proportionate and legal, he added.

The Syrian government said it was not responsible and the US and others were using it as an excuse to attack it.

The UK is considering military options following last week's suspected attack, which is being investigated by the United Nations.

Mr Cameron said he believed that the Syrian government had the "motive and the opportunity" to use chemical weapons while the likelihood of opposition forces being the perpetrators was "vanishingly small".

"What we have seen in Syria are appalling scenes of death and suffering because of the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime," he said. "I don't believe we can let that stand."

While there was no question of the UK and its allies seeking to alter the outcome of the military struggle in Syria, they must decide whether limited military action was needed to "deter and degrade the future use of chemical weapons".

'Ready to go'

Start Quote

The words "international law" convey the sense of a set of established international rules and authorities agreed by all nations, and easily understood and applied by them. Sadly that is far from the case”

End Quote

Downing Street confirmed that the prime minister had spoken to President Barack Obama on Tuesday evening but said no decisions would be taken before a meeting of the National Security Council (NSC) on Wednesday.

The US has said there is "clear" evidence that President Bashar al-Assad's government was behind last week's attack on the outskirts of Damascus but Russia, a key ally of Syria, has questioned this.

US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel said US forces were "ready to go" if given the order by President Obama but the facts of what had happened needed to be fully established before any decisions were taken.

A report on chemical weapons use being compiled by US intelligence would be published later this week, White House spokesman Jay Carney has said.

The Syrian authorities have blamed opposition fighters, with whom they have been involved in a civil war for more than two years.

UN weapons inspectors examined the scene of one of the alleged attacks on Monday - after being delayed by a sniper attack on their convoy - but on Tuesday postponed a second trip to rebel-held suburbs of Damascus until Wednesday because of safety fears.

'Flagrant abuse'

After cutting short his holiday to deal with the crisis, the prime minister said the House of Commons Speaker, John Bercow, had granted his request for Parliament to be recalled from its summer recess four days early, and MPs would have the chance to vote on a "clear motion" of action.

Nick Clegg: "The use of chemical weapons is a repugnant crime and a flagrant abuse of law"

Mr Cameron has held meetings with senior colleagues, including his deputy Nick Clegg and Foreign Secretary William Hague, ahead of a meeting of the NSC on Wednesday.

Mr Clegg, whose Liberal Democrats opposed the intervention in Iraq, said there would not be a "boots-on-the-ground invasion" of Syria.

He said: "The use of chemical weapons on men, women and children is a flagrant abuse of international law and if we stand idly by we set a very dangerous precedent."

He added that "any steps taken will have to be legal".

Labour leader Ed Miliband said there was a "lot of evidence" pointing to the past use of chemical weapons by the regime but any international response must be legally sound and be based on precise, achievable objectives.

Iraq legacy

It is understood the most likely military response to Wednesday's suspected chemical weapons attack would be a one-off or limited guided missile strikes on Syrian military targets fired from US Navy warships.

Thursday's Commons vote on the issue would not be legally binding but No 10 sources said the prime minister would listen to the will of Parliament amid concerns from MPs from all parties about the consequences of military intervention.

Although the Commons voted on UK military intervention in Iraq in 2003 and Libya in 2011, Mr Cameron has the final say on deploying troops in conflicts, using Royal Prerogative powers.

Conservative MP Richard Ottaway said many MPs felt they had been "misled" over Iraq and urged ministers to make any intelligence about the chemical attacks available to members of Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee - which meets in private.

Meanwhile, General Lord Dannatt - until 2009 head of the British Army - said military action without UN backing would be "wrong", and called on the PM to "convince the British people that there is a clear case for intervention".

Moscow has warned that any foreign involvement in Syria without a UN mandate would be "a grave violation of international law".

The UN Security Council is made up of 15 states, including five permanent members - China, Russia, France, the US and the UK - who have the power to veto any resolution.

The Obama administration is reportedly studying the Nato-led military campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999 as a potential precedent for intervention without a specific UN mandate.

The US and UK supported more than 70 days of air strikes against the regime of Slobodan Milosevic - in the face of Russian opposition - to protect civilians from further attacks in Kosovo.

But Syria's foreign minister, Walim Moualem, said the US and its allies were using the alleged chemical attack as a pretext to intervene in the bitter conflict in the country and any "act of aggression" would strengthen the hand of radical elements linked to al-Qaeda.

Map: Forces which could be used in strikes against Syria
Country Forces available for Syria strike


Four destroyers - USS Gravely, USS Ramage, USS Barry and USS Mahan - are in the eastern Mediterranean, equipped with cruise missiles. Cruise missiles could also be launched from submarines. Airbases at Incirlik and Izmir in Turkey, and in Jordan, could be used to carry out strikes. Two aircraft carriers - USS Nimitz and USS Harry S Truman - are in the wider region.


Cruise missiles could be launched from a British Trafalgar class submarine. HMS Tireless was reportedly sighted in Gibraltar at the weekend. The Royal Navy's response force task group - which includes helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious and frigates HMS Montrose and HMS Westminster - is in the region on a previously-scheduled deployment. RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus could also be used.


Aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle is currently in Toulon in the western Mediterranean. Raffale and Mirage aircraft can also operate from Al-Dhahra airbase in the UAE.


More on This Story

Syria's war War in Syria


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1700.


    "1500 comments and most of them attacking other posters."


    ER, NO! If you have read them all I WOULD BE SUPRISED?
    Also as I am so enraged abour all this and have read most (sad) posters are NO war as a massive majority, and lots who feel we should go and "be accounted for" only a small minority are attacking other people on this HYS

  • rate this

    Comment number 1699.

    Fingertapper: correct.
    oil goes up, stock markets down ... fear we shall be embroiled and involved for years to come.

    Just what our enemies want. Has Tony B become DC's special adviser?
    Who will pay the huge expense if we go in? The taxpayer. And has ANY taxpayer/voter said yes to that at the ballot box?

    Someone else said we elected our MPs to make decisions for us, but not more war!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1698.

    So, what natural resources does Syria have?. Seriously, we went into Iraq, Afghanistan and both are in turmoil now.

    Plus, now civilians in any country becoming involved will be targets for terrorists etc.

    We can't expect others to keep bending over and accepting our point of view when you look at what a complete disaster out government have our country in.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1697.

    So, Syrian crisis is one of the most dangerous event in the least time. I think we are facing up with some kind of turnover of the history. Everybody who learnt history was in knowledge about using of that kind of e weapin in 1914 and the other in famous battle near Ypres. Everybody know what has happened during this battle and how fatal effects it has got for the civilians.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1696.

    1658 Drahcir-9 -what rubbish!
    Porton Down provides a world renowned expertise in chemical weapons DEFENCE. Every UK squaddies respirator haversack contains injections specifically developed by Porton to combat the effects of all known chemical agents including SARIN.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1695.

    How will firing a shed load of cruise missiles into Syria solve the crisis.
    It wont will it?.........but it will kill a large number of innocent people.
    Plus the fact Assad and the Syrian military will be doing everything possible in the next few days to prepare for the forthcoming attack!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1694.

    Oh goody another war. . . we get to use our WMDs 😊

  • rate this

    Comment number 1693.

    About to be fed another s**t sandwich, eat up evreyone. Yum yum, wotcha gonna do about it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1692.

    Has Mr Cameron considered that Assads wife is a British citizen ? What if she asked for Consular assistance for her and her spouse? Hmmm

  • rate this

    Comment number 1691.

    We have no interest in Syria and should mind our own business. Whilst the events there are deplorable, both sides have been involved in illegal behavior. We backed one side in 1980's Afghanistan and look how that turned out. Its not worth risking one British serviceman for - keep out

  • rate this

    Comment number 1690.

    David Cameron should read Machiavelli's Art of War.
    "War makes thieves, and peace hangs them."

  • rate this

    Comment number 1689.

    If anybody is to do anything, it should be the UN. That's it. If the UN cannot agree, nothing should be done.

    How hard is that for our politicians to understand?

    I hate as much as anyone the suffering which civilians are going through, but this is an Arab country surrounded by Arab countries and it not for the UK, France or the US to go wading in.

    I have never been on a march or demo. So far.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1688.

    Imagine the following conversation a year ago in the US:-

    "Let's create a line they must not cross"
    "Yeah....then in a years time we invent a story and tell the world they crossed it"
    "Yeah, yeah.....then we can go to war"

    Our war mongers return, never learning the lessons from Iraq....wars make the world a more dangerous place.


  • rate this

    Comment number 1687.

    We still don’t know who carried out this attack, clearly seems that the USA and UK are ready to take us all war again. As a member of Her Majesty Armed forces I did not join to fight counties that have not attacked the UK or it interest. Yet again we rust into a war without all the facts, just like Iraq 2003 again! No WMD lie to by the UK government, ‘it ok lads still war is legal to fight’.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1686.

    It is definitely none of our business. If the USA wish to go in fine but I am totally against getting involved. Just another Afghanistan and no one will win and we as a nation will loose soldiers for no good reason.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1685.

    Here we go again. Afghanistan almost over. Iran coming to an end. How can we possibly keep the paymasters of weapons manufacturers happy.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1684.

    Because Iraq turned out so well, didn't it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1683.

    If Borat Obama wants to go to war with Syria let him but keep our troops out or dose he need our help so they don't get their butts whipped like in Vietnam. Also whats in it for us? Syria has loads of sand, what we going to do nick it and corner the market in egg timers? The U.S has draged us into 2 wars lately. UK GOV LISTEN. WE CANNOT AFFORD A 3RD

  • rate this

    Comment number 1682.

    The odious Cameron is desperate to become involved purely to enhance his standing on the international stage, he is a pygmy on this stage - and rightly so - all he wants is to garner votes by trying to appear statesmanlike. The facts are of no consequence even though they are the same as Iraq i.e. twist them to suit your purpose, or, in the case of the USA, to suit the purpose of Israel.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1681.

    So - we interfere in Middle East politics - we create abysmal regimes because it suits our needs. We arm them to the teeth because its good for GDP - then when the inevitable bloodbath happens we rush around trying to be moral! Maybe a total rethink about how we conduct ourselves globally and how we do business is in order?


Page 17 of 101


More Politics stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.