Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting

 

Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma: "The leaders will all completely understand"

Related Stories

For the first time since 1973 the Queen will not be attending the Commonwealth heads of government meeting this year, Buckingham Palace has said.

She will be represented by the Prince of Wales at the summit in Sri Lanka in November.

Buckingham Palace said it was reviewing the amount of long-haul travel the Queen undertook.

The Queen, 87, is the head of the Commonwealth and every two years leaders meet to discuss global issues.

The Queen was first present at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm) in Ottawa, Canada, in 1973 - missing the first one in 1971 - and has been at every summit since. The last one, in 2011, was held in Perth, Australia.

'Transition'

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: "I can confirm the Queen will be represented by the Prince of Wales.

"The reason is that we are reviewing the amount of long-haul travel that is taken by the Queen."

This is a significant decision for the Queen and for her eldest son and heir.

The 87-year-old monarch won't have arrived at it lightly - she hasn't missed a heads of government meeting since 1973 and she regards the Commonwealth as an important dimension of her reign.

It is an acknowledgement of her advancing age and not, her officials insist, in order to avoid the political question about whether or not Sri Lanka should be the host in the first place.

The focus of campaigners, who are critical of Colombo's human rights record, will now be the Prince of Wales.

Behind the scenes, the ground has been prepared for him to become the organisation's next head - a position he's not automatically entitled to.

His attendance, in November, in place of his mother, will be another very visible sign of his preparation for kingship.

BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt said the Queen would not have taken the decision lightly and it was both surprising and significant.

He said it was a significant moment for the Prince of Wales and it was also a symbolic move.

"It is about transition, about preparing this country for an elderly head of state who will be able to do less and less," he said.

"There is no intention of abdication. It will just not happen during her reign. It is the palace addressing the practicalities of her advancing age - you will see less of her and more of him."

It is expected that Prince Charles will be joined by the Duchess of Cornwall at the summit in the Sri Lankan capital Colombo, he added.

By stepping in for the Queen, Prince Charles will be performing one of his most significant duties to date as a future King.

He has never before attended in place of the monarch at the two-yearly gathering of Commonwealth leaders. In 2007, both the Prince and the Queen attended Chogm in Uganda.

Prime Minister David Cameron said the Queen's decision was "entirely understandable" and did not reflect any decrease in her commitment to the Commonwealth.

He said: "I think we should all pay tribute to the incredible work that Her Majesty has done over six decades in support of the Commonwealth. I know that she is as passionate about the Commonwealth today as she has ever been."

Politically tricky

The Queen was forced to cancel her appearance in March at the Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey, the first time the monarch had missed the occasion in 20 years.

Key summits the Queen has attended

Queen Elizabeth during the opening ceremony of the 2002 Chogm in Queensland, Australia.
  • Gleneagles 1977: Sporting contacts with South Africa "discouraged" but not banned in protest against Apartheid
  • Lusaka 1979: Commonwealth united by aim to "to rid the world of the evils of racism". Apartheid further condemned as an "affront to humanity"
  • Langkawi 1989: Declaration warned of "permanent and irreversible damage" caused by greenhouse gases, calling for more "sustainable" environmental policies in response to the risk
  • Harare 1991: Human rights and democracy were central to the declaration, issued at Chogm, chaired by Zimbabwe president Robert Mugabe. Zimbabwe was suspended from the Commonwealth in 2002 for failing to adhere to the principles of the declaration signed on its soil
  • Perth 2011: The principle that male heirs should succeed to the British throne ahead of elder female siblings, or male primogeniture, was abandoned

It was one of a number of engagements she cancelled after being admitted to hospital suffering from the symptoms of gastroenteritis.

The Queen is the Commonwealth's symbolic head and has no formal powers over the 54 countries and two billion citizens which make up the voluntary association.

Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma said the "family of nations completely understands and respects" the Queen's decision.

"The presence of the Prince of Wales at our Commonwealth gathering will carry forward Her Majesty's outstanding record of enduring commitment and diligent service as head of the Commonwealth," he said.

Concerns have been raised about the choice of Sri Lanka as the host nation for the 2013 summit.

Campaigners including Amnesty International are calling for the Chogm meeting not to take place there before an investigation is carried out into human rights abuses in the final six months of the 26-year Sri Lankan civil war.

Britain is facing pressure to lead a boycott of the meeting, with Canada's government indicating it will not attend unless specific criteria are met.

Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said he hoped Mr Cameron would "think again" about his decision to attend the summit "given the very serious and continuing allegations in relation to human rights".

He told Channel 4 News: "I think he should be using the coming months between now and November to be very clear to the Sri Lankans that unless we see substantive change then he, along with the Canadian and other governments, I hope, will give very serious consideration to boycotting this summit."

Buckingham Palace said the Queen's decision was not related to the political situation.

"The key point here is that the Queen will be represented, although she is not there in person, by the Prince of Wales," a spokesman said.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 63.

    @51. john Maguire

    IDIOT.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 62.

    7. Willo77 "I hear France is a Republic. I suggest you disappear off there." This country is famous for its freedom of speech, which you seem to want to curtail. You appear to be saying "conform to my views or get out." Perhaps you assume that you are speaking for everybody?

  • rate this
    -54

    Comment number 61.

    She has hogged the limelight, used public finance to support her lifestyle, backs rotten politicians who have been living at westminster, she is ultimately the head of Britain, & look where we are; overcrowded, underpaid, cannot afford to rent our buy our homes; & this is all due to her being on the throne; she is also responsible for the bankers doing what they do, they all have her blessing!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 60.

    #54 will disappear soon, but I feel privileged I got to read something like that on the BBC website.

    Well done Your Majesty, on learning to delegate. Maybe you can get Anne to do something useful too?

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 59.

    23.SeeingClearly

    " But she believes she has a "devine right" to rule"

    She believes no such thing. In British constitutional monarchy the monarch does not 'rule' but has a duty - for life - to represent Britain as head of state. The Queen has done (and still does) perform that role with skill, dignity and minimal publicity. I assume that you are not British, and your insults are unwelcome.

  • rate this
    +94

    Comment number 58.

    HM is wonderful. When she ascended the throne, she vowed to dedicate her life to the UK and all commonwealth countries. Not many people keep their word as consistently as she has.
    She is just being sensible in not flying to Sri Lanka and she is also giving Charles a taste of what life will be for him when he finally reaches the throne.

  • rate this
    +13

    Comment number 57.

    Quite understandable, Sri Lanka's a looong flight!

    Good idea for HRH The Prince of Wales to go: he needs to meet the Commonwealth leaders en masse. Call it part of his internship :)

  • rate this
    -28

    Comment number 56.

    Who Cares!!!!!

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 55.

    Sri lanka is Genocide country!! thats why she try to avoid!!!!

  • Comment number 54.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    -20

    Comment number 53.

    When are we going to realise that monarchy is old fashioned?

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 52.

    Our queen deserves to retire, but she won't; she will simply send poor replacements across the world to do her bidding. It will be a sad day that Charles is called King, it should bypass him, he married a divorcee & should not be allowed to be King under our own counrty's rules - had his uncle been allowed to marry HIS divorcee and keep his crown, Charles would never have been Prince of Wales.

  • rate this
    -45

    Comment number 51.

    If she isn't willing to do the task involved in the job, will she hand back some of the salary. If she's not fit enough for the post, she should be sacked and replaced, just like anyone else. Simple.

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 50.

    @Bruxical (19)

    "I'm a republican. But I love the monarchy. My head says republic, my heart says monarchy."
    __

    I'll bet that if you think *why* you love the monarchy, it'll boil down to the present incumbent happening to be a lovable sort. As soon as we are lumbered with a bad one, the failings of the hereditary system will be all too obvious. Follow your head: it says what it does for a reason.

  • rate this
    +41

    Comment number 49.

    @ Sue

    Did it never occur to you that the reason your anti-monarchy vote did not seem to register is that people also voted the other way? Their votes would have cancelled yours out.
    Best to think it through before launching a conspiracy theory.

  • rate this
    -90

    Comment number 48.

    I know the gracious Lady has said that she will never abdicate, but Her absences from events are increasing. Wouldn't it be sensible for the Queen, and our country, if she was to take her well deserved retirement? As a republican, it doesn't look good having the CEO of UK plc. regularly missing events.

  • rate this
    +23

    Comment number 47.

    @ 13

    Yes, but any president would certainly be much less popular than the monarch. Look at the PM, not even 50% of the vote and that's just the people that turned out. Hardly inspiring, is it? A faceless bureaucrat nobody likes is the country's identity

    A non-political head of state is a great asset to a country, and hereditary monarchy is as good a way as any for choosing a ceremonial post

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 46.

    8.Zapporah - "Leave her be - do you know many 87 year olds who work 365 days a year, who don't get paid a salary (as such - albeit she has a very comfortable life)..."

    You must be a troll? No I don't know many 87yr olds who work 365, but then I don't know many of any age that consider all expenses paid luxury travel and lifestyle as 'work'. Those roles are never advertised in my local paper.

  • rate this
    +49

    Comment number 45.

    That lady is so good at her job that she is in danger of being irreplaceable.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 44.

    I mean no disrespect, but the Queen is old and there's only a finite amount of time she can carry on with duties such as this. She's been the Monarch for 61 years, so I understand her "family" bond with the Commonwealth.

    And to those of you who complain about her tax-payer funded life, how much revenue do you think the Royal Family indirectly generate in tourism?

 

Page 34 of 37

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

  • Children in Africa graphicBaby steps

    Why are more children in Africa living beyond five?


  • Olive oil and olivesFood myth

    Did 1950s Britain get its olive oil from a pharmacy?


  • Rio Ferdinand and David Moyes'Playing to win'

    Memorable quotes from sporting autobiographies BBC Sport


  • Hand washing to contain Ebola in LiberiaEbola virus

    More action is needed to tackle Ebola, say experts


  • shadow of people kissing on grassOutdoor love

    Should the police intervene when people have sex in public?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.