Abu Qatada case: UK agrees assistance treaty with Jordan

 

Home Secretary Theresa May warned that the legal process "may well still take many months"

Related Stories

The government has signed a mutual assistance treaty with Jordan to ensure that radical cleric Abu Qatada can be deported, Theresa May has told MPs.

The home secretary said the treaty had guarantees on fair trials within it.

The government is doing "everything it can" to deport Abu Qatada, she said.

The move comes after she failed to get the case referred to the Supreme Court to reverse a ruling that the radical cleric could face an unfair trial if sent to Jordan to face terror charges.

Mrs May is to apply directly to the Supreme Court for permission to challenge that ruling.

The treaty would come into play should the Supreme Court reject the government's request.

The withdrawal of the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights is another option being explored by the prime minister, said Mrs May, who added that it was "sensible" to have "all options on the table".

But cabinet minister and former home secretary Ken Clarke dismissed that idea, saying it is "not the policy of this government".

'Every chance'

Giving a statement to the Commons, Mrs May said the treaty would have to be ratified by the UK and Jordan.

She said she believed it would satisfy concerns that Abu Qatada would not receive a fair trial there, and there was now "every chance" of deporting the cleric.

Is this treaty the real deal?

The UK originally signed a "memorandum of understanding" with Jordan in 2005 in an effort to deport Abu Qatada.

That talked about fair trials for deportees - but it did not define what fairness meant - or refer specifically to how those trials would be conducted.

Its harshest critics said it was a grubby attempt by the UK to duck its international commitment to oppose torture.

This new treaty clearly states that torture-tainted evidence cannot be used in court against someone who is deported.

These are strong words - but the question now is whether these words can be made real. Judges here and at the European Court of Human Rights have laid down a very stringent test.

It is going to be for the government to show that test has been met.

However, Mrs May added that even once the agreement was fully ratified, Abu Qatada would still be able to launch a legal appeal. This could mean it may still be months before he is deported.

Mrs May told the Commons: "I believe these guarantees will provide the courts with the assurance that Qatada will not face evidence that might have been obtained by torture, in a retrial in Jordan."

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said she was willing to work with the government towards Abu Qatada's deportation, but accused Mrs May in the past of "overstating her legal strategy, which has not worked".

On the possibility of the UK temporarily withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights, Mrs May said it was her view that the UK needed to "fix that relationship".

BBC political correspondent Vicki Young said any suspension of the UK's membership of the ECHR is almost unprecedented and the Lib Dems are insisting they would block it.

She said: "We're told that the failure to deport Abu Qatada makes David Cameron's blood boil and he's ordered ministers to find a solution.

"The best case scenario for the government is that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case and rules that Qatada can be deported, but few think that likely."

Mr Clarke, a former home secretary, told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme: "If I was asked my advice on that by any of my colleagues I would say I don't think that's got the faintest thing to do with the case with Abu Qatada.

"It is not the policy of this government to withdraw either for any short period or any lengthy period from the European Convention on Human Rights."

'Denial of justice'

The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac), which adjudicates on national security-related deportations, ruled last year that Abu Qatada should not be removed from the UK because his retrial could be tainted by evidence obtained by torturing the cleric's former co-defendants.

Mrs May had argued she had obtained fresh assurances that would guarantee the fair treatment of the preacher on his return to Amman.

But the Court of Appeal upheld Siac's decision last month, saying the lower court had not misinterpreted nor misapplied the law.

Yvette Cooper: Theresa May has "overstated her legal strategy"

Government lawyers had stressed that Jordan had banned torture and the use in trial of statements extracted under duress.

But the Court of Appeal judges said Siac had been entitled to think there was a risk the "impugned statements" would be used in evidence during a retrial and there was "a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice".

The Supreme Court can reconsider Court of Appeal decisions if the justices are convinced there is a "point of law of general public importance".

On 17 April 2012, the home secretary told the Commons that, following fresh assurances from Jordan that he would get a fair trial, "we can soon put Qatada on a plane and get him out of our country for good".

Bids for freedom before the European Court of Human Rights and the High Court followed before Abu Qatada's successful appeal to Siac in November.

Abu Qatada was re-arrested and returned to Belmarsh prison in March, following an alleged breach of bail conditions, concerning the use of communications equipment at his home.

Who is Abu Qatada? Abu Qatada was born in Bethlehem in 1960 and spent his early life in Jordan. He fled to Pakistan in 1989 claiming political persecution and eventually arrived in the UK in 1993. Abu Qatada was part of a wave of Islamists who sought refuge in the UK during the 1980s and 90s, often exiled from the Arab regimes they were trying to overthrow.
Algerian Islamists pray, 1992 Abu Qatada emerged as a key voice in the Islamist movement in London, which advocated strict Islamic government in Muslim countries and armed struggle against despots and foreign invaders. His preachings and ideas won him influence among Islamist groups in Algeria and Egypt during the 1990s. He was tried and found guilty in his absence of terrorism offences in Jordan in 1999.
Ruins of the World Trade Center By 2001 fears were growing about Abu Qatada's hard-line views. He endorsed suicide attacks in a BBC interview and was questioned in connection with a German terror cell. Copies of his sermons were found in the Hamburg flat used by some of the 9/11 attackers and Spanish judge Balthazar Garzon described him as the "spiritual head of the mujahideen in Britain". In December 2001, Abu Qatada disappeared and became one of the UK's most wanted men.
Abu Qatada in 2005 In October 2002 Abu Qatada was arrested and detained without charge. He was released in 2005 and put under strict house arrest, but months later was arrested under immigration rules and moves began to deport him to Jordan to face retrial on the charges he had been convicted of six years earlier. In 2007 he lost his immigration case, but the Court of Appeal later ruled that deportation to a regime which uses torture - ie Jordan - would breach his human rights.
BBC The Court of Appeal ruling was overturned by the Law Lords in early 2009, and the then Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith (L), signed a deportation order. Abu Qatada then appealed to the European Court, which eventually ruled that he could not be deported while the risk of torture remained. In 2012 Home Secretary Theresa May (R) pressed ahead with deportation, but this was blocked amid a row over the appeal deadline.
Abu Qatada In November 2012 Abu Qatada was released from prison once more after a UK court backed his appeal on the grounds that witness evidence obtained by torture could be used against him at trial in Jordan. That was a disastrous blow to the Home Office because it meant the only way the deportation could happen would be if Jordan changed its system to ensure torture-tainted evidence could not be used.
Abu Qatada Abu Qatada was then returned to prison on 9 March 2013 after an alleged breach of his bail conditions - but this deportation was still blocked. Weeks later, Home Secretary Theresa May announced a new UK-Jordan treaty to improve co-operation in criminal investigations. That treaty included a guarantee of a fair trial free of torture-tainted evidence for anyone sent back to Jordan. Abu Qatada's lawyers announced he would now return to Jordan.
 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 277.

    The judiciary are drawn from a very narrow elite from priveliged backgrounds what we need is a judiciary of the people for the people. I would suggest breaking the monoply of the bar by allowing magistrates from ordinary backgrounds of a number of years standing to become judges by passing a exam. The judiciary would then look more like it's audience. However the elite protect their priveleges.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 276.

    MP Mark Reckless accused her of a "craven surrender" to the Court.
    So are we to take it that we can now decide wether or not to obey court orders, sentences etc. Only a simpleton would make such a crass comment. Should be stripped of his seat.As For May, Siac made the decision not the European court. It was made under UK law NOT EU law. Stop pandering to UKIP supporters and get on with your job.

  • rate this
    -13

    Comment number 275.

    @221. clive

    The ignorance of the British public never ceases to astonish me on these types of articles. It seems that all logic, common sense and humanity floods out of them and is replaced by sheer animalistic hatred. What a shame.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 274.

    This individual should be deported with any family, he has insighted hatred and caused hurt to many, where are our human rights to stay safe.

  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 273.

    Disgusting that he's still here. Get him out at the earliest opportunity, he isn't welcome in this country.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 272.

    The laws that this man invokes to remain here are universal in application. They are there to protect me and you, and yes, him! To deny these rights to anyone is to deny us all access to a fair and just juducial system. You cannot choose to disregard it just because you dont like him or disagree with him. It strikes me that the overpaid lawyers advising May are the ones we should be upset with.

  • Comment number 271.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 270.

    Some people do not deserve"human rights" ...there is never any smoke without fire and the Jordanian government do not need anyone like you trying to defend those whom they know have committed crimes against their state!

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 269.

    ...just stop his benefits, that'll focus his mind.
    Or, deport him to......an uninhabited island in The Falklands.
    Let him find his own way back to Jordan....

    Of course, if he finds his way back to the UK the Border Agency will get him, er, won't they?

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 268.

    If there is sufficient evidence against him, he could be tried here, irrespective of where his alleged crimes took place. If there is not a prima facie case, then we shouldn't be considering deporting him. There is something sinister about the government's desperation to deport him, and the media's portrayal of him as somewhat evil, despite no charges ever having been brought in the UK.

  • rate this
    +30

    Comment number 267.

    Get him out of Belmarsh, Take him and his family to the nearest private plane that goes to Jordon - Make sure he gets off at the other end.
    Worry about the consequences after
    Think France got fined about 25,000 Euros when they did the same.. Better than over 500k legal aid fees

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 266.

    249.
    zakida
    6 Minutes ago

    I am amazed that people think it is ok to pick and choose who gets Human Rights. Qatada may be an unpleasant person but he is a human being and therefore entitled to the same rights as everyone else. Go ahead and attack me all you want, it doesn't make me wrong.
    -
    It doesn't make you morally right either, remember the MP's expenses scandal, nothing illegal - but immoral?

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 265.

    The fundamental point is the supremacy of a democratically elected parliament over the judiciary, a basic facet if English history, which we lost when we joined the EU.
    This supremacy must be restored

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 264.

    Its times like this I miss Mrs. Thatcher.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 263.

    I want to know how much time/money the government has spent on it. I can sense more of a political statement rather than a practical solution. Is he going to become the holy grail of TM's achievement? Getting on the headline when AQ gets deported and then run for PM?
    C'mon, leave it, let him be, put a couple MI5 agents on him 24/7. Must be cheaper than paying for the lawyers. Sigh, my tax money..

  • rate this
    -84

    Comment number 262.

    reading through the comments on this subject I wonder if any of the people would like to be Qatada's position jailed for years without being tried and being threatened with expulsionto a country that has found him guilty without him being there and the evidence was gathered using torture. Jordan has long history of torture. No piece of paper can negate this that is why the courts keep backing him

  • Comment number 261.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 260.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +100

    Comment number 259.

    Jordan want him back - we want to get rid of him.The government should get on and do it - they would get the backing of 90% of the voting public.Let the judges wring their hands on this one- they are letting us down and putting everyone in danger - thats not justice!

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 258.

    Just put this scum on a plane home and be done with him!

 

Page 41 of 54

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.