Welfare reform and the prosperity gap

Bus stop with poster about benefit changes

Will the welfare reforms widen or narrow the gap between rich and poor communities in the UK? According to new research published by Sheffield Hallam University on Thursday, cuts to benefit payments will "widen the gaps in prosperity".

The Department of Work and Pensions, however, argues the changes will benefit poorer regions because they "help people back into work - which will benefit the economy more than simply abandoning them to claim benefits year after year."

Here, laid bare, is a fundamental question for the future well-being of the UK. If Iain Duncan-Smith is able to squeeze billions from the welfare bill by getting people into jobs, then he will have achieved what politicians of all hues have failed to do in decades. Deprived post-industrial towns and cities will bloom again.

But the concern is that the welfare reforms will actually take far more money out of fragile poor economies than rich ones, making old industrial areas even less attractive to investors and entrepreneurs. There won't be the jobs for claimants to get into.

The Sheffield Hallam research assesses the geographical consequence of welfare reforms by comparing claimant caseloads in local authorities and factoring in the DWP's own impact assessments. It calculates that, by 2015, a whopping £19bn will be taken out of working-age benefits each year - but the effects are far from even.

Ranking the overall impact in terms of the effect upon the average working-age adult in each place, the town hardest hit is Blackpool, where the annual loss per adult is calculated at £914. One really has to hope new jobs do come because this is a place with pockets of truly shocking deprivation. Over a quarter of the town receives working-age benefits.

PDF download Sheffield Hallam research[5.35 MB]

One of the authorities affected least by the welfare reforms is Hart in Hampshire - a community which enjoys precisely zero wards designated as deprived. Here the average working-age adult will lose £241, according to the Sheffield Hallam study, just over a quarter of the impact felt in Blackpool.

10 local authorities most affected by welfare reforms

Loss for each working-age adult a year

  • Blackpool, north-west England: £914
  • Westminster, London: £821
  • Knowsley, north-west England: £797
  • Merthyr Tydfil, Wales: £722
  • Middlesbrough, north-east England: £717
  • Hartlepool, north-east England: £712
  • Torbay, south-west England: £704
  • Liverpool, north-west England: £702
  • Blaenau Gwent, Wales: £698
  • Neath Port Talbot, Wales: £696

Source: Sheffield Hallam University

10 local authorities least affected by welfare reforms

Loss for each working-age adult a year

  • Chiltern, south-east England: £266
  • South Bucks, south-east England: £264
  • Guildford, south-east England: £263
  • South Northamptonshire, East Midlands: 261
  • South Oxfordshire, south-east England: £258
  • Rutland, East Midlands: £258
  • Wokingham, south-east England: £251
  • Cambridge, east England: £247
  • Hart, south-east England: £241
  • City of London £177

Source: Sheffield Hallam University

In London, the contrast is stark. In the City of London, the loss per head is said to be just £177, while in neighbouring Westminster it is £821 - mostly down to the loss of housing benefit. The cap on housing benefit will cost the average Westminster adult £387 a year, while the under-occupancy charge - or bedroom tax - sees a further loss of £64.

Since the data looks at the effect on ALL working-age adults regardless of whether they receive benefits, the financial impact on individual claimants is even greater.

Changes to incapacity benefit hit hardest in south Wales and the west of Scotland.

Local authorities most affected by incapacity benefit reform

Loss for each working-age adult a year

  • Merthyr Tydfil, Wales: £264
  • Blaenau Gwent, Wales: £256
  • Neath Port Talbot, Wales: £256
  • Knowsley, north-west England: £242
  • Rhondda, Cynon, Taff, Wales: £234
  • Glasgow City, Scotland: £226
  • Caerphilly, Wales: £224
  • Inverclyde, Scotland: £219
  • Blackpool, north-west England: £217
  • Barrow-in-Furness, north-west England: £212

Source: Sheffield Hallam University

It is, of course, no surprise that changes to welfare affect those places where more people are claiming benefits. But according to one of the authors of the Sheffield Hallam research, Steve Fothergill, there are worrying economic and social consequences.

"A key effect of the welfare reforms will be to widen the gaps in prosperity between the best and the worst local economies across Britain. Our figures also show that the coalition government is presiding over national welfare reforms that will impact principally on individuals and communities outside its own political heartlands."

The counter argument is that it is precisely those communities which have become most reliant on benefits that can profit most from reforms designed to ensure people are always better off in work than on welfare.

The Department of Work and Pensions said this: "Around nine out of 10 working households will be better off by on average almost £300 a year as a result of changes to the tax and welfare system this month. Raising the personal allowance to £10,000 will have lifted 2.7m people out of income tax since 2010.

"These changes are essential to keep the benefits bill sustainable, so that we can continue to support people when they need it most across the UK."

The local and regional impact of welfare reform is of more than academic interest. If the government is right, deprived communities will experience a renaissance. If the researchers in Sheffield are right, the cuts to benefits will see the poorest communities in Britain suffer further decline.

Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

Savile: 'How could this be allowed to happen?'

Today's investigation into Jimmy Savile reveals how his criminal behaviour "was facilitated by ministers or civil servants".

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 300.

    299. purple

    lying? I may have overstated that I'm not bitter about my losses.

    Overcharging is a profiteering technique primarily of utility and service companies - not all companies. This is due to the product (such as water) having no intrinsic growth potential and therefore, hiking the price is the only way to ensure growth year-on-year. That's why I don't invest in those companies.

  • rate this

    Comment number 299.

    297. empty1969 ~ erm, you are lying.

    The money used to build businesses is borrowed from banks.
    You probably hold shares.
    Sell when your iq reaches 28.

    If you are making money, it comes from other people by over charging. The technique is value added. Simple question ~ what is profit? It is capital. Please refer to Pareto, the source and cause of WWll. Hunters and the herd.

  • rate this

    Comment number 298.

    Interesting to note the US just discovered its imported rice full of lead. Lead at toxic levels.

    Quite possibly the trade from which 293. news_monitor makes his living in the margins. Explain it akl to Sam and no wonder you are cherperio.

    Toodle pip.


  • rate this

    Comment number 297.


    Knocking shareholders? Companies use the capital raised from shares to build their businesses. I risked my money for shares in UK Coal and HMV (amongst others) and have made losses in the £1000's. I'm not bitter about this, it's the risk of share dealing. What annoys me is when people complain when shareholders like me make money from the risks we've taken.

  • rate this

    Comment number 296.

    290.Outside the Marginals
    "I am suggesting the employment deserts are a permanent drain"

    If you write people off, they will meet your expectations!


    Then go out and do something about it!! Have faith in yourself, and in your forgetful/muddled/tired friends.

    Gloom and dependency are your biggest enemies - not a lack of welfare benefits.


Comments 5 of 300



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.