Planned switch from GCSEs to Baccalaureate in England 'abandoned'

 

Michael Gove: "My idea... was just one reform too many at this time"

Related Stories

Plans to scrap GCSEs in key subjects in England and replace them with English Baccalaureate Certificates are being abandoned by the government.

The reversal was announced by the education secretary in the Commons, alongside curriculum changes.

Michael Gove said plans for the new exams had been "a bridge too far".

He had wanted to bring in what he said were more rigorous exams in some core subjects from 2015, but faced criticism from MPs and teachers.

Labour's shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg told MPs the announcement was a "humiliating climb-down" and exam policy a "total shambles".

The change means plans for the new qualification, announced in September, are being shelved, while GCSEs are retained, despite having been previously condemned by the education secretary.

The reversal has refocused the spotlight on the future form of GCSEs .

Grade inflation

It comes after a damning report by the Commons education committee which said the changes would mean "too much, too fast" and could threaten exam quality.

The new English Baccalaureate Certificate was billed by the government as having a tougher syllabus, with exams at the end of the course in a return to an O-level style traditional qualification.

Mr Gove told MPs: "Last September we outlined plans for changes to GCSE qualifications designed to address the grade inflation, dumbing down and loss of rigour in those examinations.

"We have consulted on those proposals and there is now a consensus that the system needs to change.

"But one of the proposals I put forward was a bridge too far."

Specifically, he said that proposal had been to let just one exam board set a GCSE for each English Baccalaureate Certificate. The idea behind this was to stop what he had called a "race to the bottom" where he said exam boards might compete to offer easier qualifications.

However, he also re-stated his belief in changes already being made to GCSEs, where there has been a switch to exams being taken at the end of two years rather than in stages, fewer re-sits and a reduced role for coursework.

Start Quote

'A humiliating U-turn' by Michael Gove is how Labour describes what they're calling the #EBacctrack. 'A tweak' says the education secretary's former deputy, fellow Tory Nick Gibb. ”

End Quote

And he said a tougher GCSE in some key subjects would come in from autumn 2015.

Liberal Democrats had opposed the introduction of the English Baccalaureate Certificate, believing they would bring in a two-tier system, which would damage teenagers who were not academic enough to pass the new exams.

A senior Whitehall source told the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson a range of factors conspired to bring an end to the plans, including opposition from the regulator and concerns that introducing a single exam board for each subject could be challenged in the courts under European Union rules.

Lib Dem sources indicated they regarded this as a coalition decision not a policy victory for their party, our correspondent added.

In the Commons, Labour's Stephen Twigg said: "It's simple really, before he announces a bright idea wouldn't it be sensible to check it first with the deputy prime minister".

'Red light'

The proposals for the new qualifications were met by intense criticism from teaching unions when they were first floated last June and then set out in detail in September.

The original plan had been for the first candidates to start courses in 2015 and take the new-look exams two years later, initially in three core subject areas - English, maths and sciences - with an extension later to history, geography and languages.

Exam reform

Current GCSE EBC New GCSE

Style

Modular courses with coursework plus exams. Exams taken throughout the course as modules are completed. However, from Sep 2012, coursework and modules were reduced or reformed

"Harder syllabus", very little coursework, all exams at the end

New national curriculum, reduced coursework but GCSE brand retained. Most exams taken after two years rather than at the end of modules. Less structured, more essay-style questions

Exam board

Multiple exam boards

One exam board per subject, awarded as franchises

Retain multiple boards

Timeframe

Two year course period; exams can be taken at the end of each module

Exams taken at the end of two year period, with first exams in 2017

Exams taken at the end of two year period, with first exams in 2017

Subjects

Core subjects (English, sciences, maths) compulsory. Students can choose a range of language, technology, humanities and arts subjects

Focus on core subjects: initially English, science, maths, followed by languages, history and geography

New GCSEs in English, maths, sciences, history and geography.

Accountability

Schools judged by pupils achieving five A*-C passes including English and maths

Not defined

Percentage of pupils in a school reaching an attainment threshold in English and maths. Average point score based on a range of eight GCSEs

There was a plan to have one exam board for each subject.

Doubts had been raised about the feasibility of awarding the franchises for subjects within the timetable set for the new qualifications, which were to be taught from autumn 2015.

Exam regulator Ofqual had written to Mr Gove suggesting this should not go ahead at the same time as the other changes planned for GCSEs and A-levels.

Last week a report from the Commons Education Select Committee issued a "red light" warning to the government, urging it to slow down and rethink its proposed changes to GCSEs and the exam system.

The cross-party report warned the proposed changes were being rushed and risked damaging the exam system.

MPs' criticisms had been echoed by teachers and head teachers' unions.

In the Commons, Mr Gove also announced changes to the performance measures used in school league tables.

There will be a new eight-subject measure of GCSEs, including English and maths, three subjects out of sciences, languages, history and geography and three other subjects, such as art, music or RE.

This will in effect be a wider version of the English Baccalaureate measure, which some have criticised as being too narrow, although that measure will remain.

Russell Hobby, leader of the National Association of Head Teachers, said the government had "slammed on the brakes just before the cliff face".

He said it would have been impossible to implement what had been planned.

The announcements on abandoning the new qualifications come alongside the publication of changes to the curriculum for primary and secondary schools.

The English Baccalaureate Certificate (EBC) was a key part of Michael Gove's plans to shake up England's exams system and "restore rigour" to it.

It hit the buffers for political, practical and commercial reasons and in the face of strong opposition, not least from exams regulator Ofqual and MPs on the education select committee.

The idea of an exam which was not for everyone was very unpopular with the Liberal Democrats and with teaching unions, who all warned of a move to a "two-tier" system or a return to the divisions of O-levels and CSEs.

Pupils were due to begin studying for EBCs in some key subjects in 2015. They won't now, but other changes remain, such as the move towards exams at the end of two years rather than being taken in chunks and towards fewer resits.

Read Angela Harrison's analysis

Mr Gove has already set out principles arguing there should be a clear set of core information pupils should learn in areas such as maths, science, history and literature.

Programmes of study in almost all subjects except for primary English, maths and science have been slimmed down.

'Entirely wrong'

Earlier, Labour's shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "This is a humiliating climb-down for Michael Gove but more important than that it is really good news for education.

"The proposal risked turning the clock back to the kind of exam system that we had when I was at school that wrote a lot of young people off at 14 but it also crowded out a lot of very important parts of the curriculum."

The general secretary of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), Christine Blower, said she was delighted Mr Gove had made a U-turn.

"We have amassed a very big coalition of our own around the fact that introducing the Ebacc was entirely the wrong thing to do, certainly in the kind of timescale that Mr Gove had in mind, so we think this is a very good move and we're very pleased."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 182.

    It seems to me that the Government have listened and despite their desire to improve the system have accepted that the path they wished to pursue was not generally approved. Personally this seems to be a sign of good government, being able to listen and respond. Much better they do this than plough on against the tide. A new proposal can be thought through and implemented in due course.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 181.

    @151KateB
    You didn't need to say you were a teacher. I gathered that from the lack of apostrophes and commas in your post.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 180.

    can we please remove politics from things like education and health, and in fact any subject where professional experience is useful...sick and tired of inexperienced amateurs messing things up.
    And when will the Conservatives adopt "you spin me eight round" as their anthem, them beign the party of u-turns... ?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 179.

    Again people, it is GCSEs not GCSE's. You can't comment on education standards if you get this wrong.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 178.

    Bean's reactionary demand for rigour betrays Tory ideological SlateThink; throw more Education at them and they'll be smarter (because they're all the same really) ... It's surely time to abandon this biologically bizarre approach and accept that wee Johnny will never be able to conjugate Latin verbs or solve simultaneous equations - worse, forcing him to is akin to torture ...

    Can Bean now ...

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 177.

    Whilst I am pleased that these changes have been shelved, Gove has trashed the reputation of GCSEs so badly I fear for my childrens future (they are 16 and 15 just at GCSE stage) what value will employers put on their results?
    Now lets consult with professionals, lets study Countries with more successful education systems and lets move forward in a progressive, measured way.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 176.

    A bit like a naugthy child, throws a tantrum when he doesn't like the lesson or the class. Then a professional teacher calms him down, talks to him, gets him interested in the lesson and he realise's he was just being a naughty child!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 175.

    Gove is attempting to force his sheep and goats position on A levels. If you have children starting A levels from 2015 then you should be worried. The 1950s are on the way...

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 174.

    I'm convinced this confusion is deliberate. It's only the teachers and kids in state education that suffer from this uncertainty whilst the kids from those that can afford Private education are taught properly.

    Plus ca change... And it's the moneyed classes that win in the end.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 173.

    Oh come on .... makes you minds up! Another complete waste of time!!!!!

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 172.

    Glad the English Baccalaureate is dropped. It really devalued the International Baccalaureate, which is a qualification even above A-levels.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 171.

    M. Gove
    Education: Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford (1985 – 1988), Robert Gordon's College, University of Oxford

    say no more...

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 170.

    153 yawn

    What utter rubbish .what has happened is .
    draft proposal. Consultation . Amended proposal consultaion . Final proposal.
    If the policy had been introduced then your point would hold water . It has not . Get over it .

    164 Annie
    " how much has this cost" . No more than any other policy amendment . And a hell of a lot less than getting it wrong . Again pie in the sky comments.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 169.

    Who would choose to work in education. A constantly criticised political football booted around a pitch built on quick sand and where the goal posts are forever being shifted to ensure no one ever achieves any goals to be roundly applauded.
    It must be the most demoralising industry in which to work....ever!

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 168.

    Nah, lets just keep messing up kids education by continuously changing the system up so every year the kids get messed around and cannot focus.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 167.

    In his hurry to make his mark to advance his political ambitions, Mr Grove has come a cropper: serve him right! It seems that every Sec. of State for Ed, who's never around long anyway, likes to put his soft hands into the water, stir it about until lots of mud rises & then get moved on. Be warned, this man is driven by ambition - lacks any sensible vision - apart from advancing his career.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 166.

    It's hardly surprising that putting somebody with zero experience of the education system in charge of the Department of Education will have fairly incoherent result.

    Mr Gove is a well connected party ideologue, parachuted into the one of the safest Tory seats in the country -Surrey Heath.

    Its difficult to see how this model of Government can be effective.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 165.

    As usual the Tories come up with a ridiculous idea and end up making a U Turn. Perhaps we should be calling Cameron's party the 'U Turn' party.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 164.

    How much has this cost the country?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 163.

    Sensible call.

    This country needs no more "Big Initiatives" until it can ensure that its old people do not starve to death.

    I would be happy if David Cameron called a complete stop to all political business to give government the resource to sort this out.

 

Page 33 of 42

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

  • VigoroAnyone for Vigoro?

    The bizarre Edwardian attempt to merge tennis and cricket


  • ScissorsTwo more years

    How the UK's life expectancy changes without Scotland


  • Payton McKinnonLeft behind

    Why do so many children die in hot cars?


  • Dr Mahinder Watsa Dr Sex

    The wisecracking 90-year-old whose agony column is a cult hit


  • White Rhino, KenyaSky rangers

    How drones may be used to fight wildlife poaching in Africa


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.