Nick Clegg calls for royal commission on drugs reform
Mr Clegg said the government needed to be "open-minded", as Mark Easton reports
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg is calling for a royal commission on drugs, just five days after the prime minister and the home secretary rejected the idea.
On Monday an all-party committee of MPs recommended there should be a fundamental review of Britain's drugs laws, but David Cameron said that was unnecessary.
Now Mr Clegg has said the worst thing people can do is close their mind to drug reforms.
Mr Clegg told the BBC he wanted to break what he called the "conspiracy of silence", where politicians while in government refuse to consider alternatives to the so-called war on drugs because it is "all too controversial".
US examplesBy calling for a royal commission to be set up, the deputy prime minister is at complete odds with David Cameron who emphatically rejected the idea.
A royal commission is a public inquiry, established by the head of state, into a defined subject and overseen by a commissioner who has quasi-judicial powers.
"I don't see this as a thing between myself and the prime minister," Mr Clegg said. "It's what do we as a country believe is the right thing to do."
“Start Quote
End Quote Nick Clegg Deputy Prime MinisterMy view is that we've been waging the war on drugs for almost 40 years, and I don't think by any stretch of the imagination it has worked”
Asked if he was at risk of being soft on drugs, Mr Clegg said: "There's nothing hard about turning your back against the evidence."
He said he wanted the government to look at the system in Portugal where all drugs have been depenalised and also at the experience in the US states of Washington and Colorado where marijuana was recently legalised.
"If you are anti-drugs, you should be pro-reform. That is my view," he said.
At their party conference last year, the Liberal Democrats voted to establish a panel to consider decriminalising the use of all drugs. Reform of drug laws is an issue that has long been pursued by some in the party.
However, Mr Clegg has now set himself at odds with his Conservative coalition partners. He told the prime minister of his intention to support a royal commission, in defiance of Mr Cameron's publicly stated position, at a meeting in Downing Street.
"Both the prime minister and I are relaxed about the idea that this isn't an identikit government," Mr Clegg said.
'Fact-finding'"The home secretary and indeed the prime minister are perfectly entitled to say that they want the government's present approach to be given a chance to work and don't want the distraction of a royal commission.
"My view is that we've been waging the war on drugs for almost 40 years, and I don't think by any stretch of the imagination it has worked."
The Home Office and Downing Street both say there is no need to review Britain's drug laws, pointing out that drug use is falling while numbers in treatment are rising.
However, Mr Clegg has said the drugs minister at the Home Office, Liberal Democrat Jeremy Browne, will be sent on a fact-finding mission to look at the experience in countries experimenting with decriminalisation and legalisation.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~17~RS~)




Obama defends 'just' drones war
'Field of diamonds'
The dogulator
Slave pride
Le Shopping?
Winning business
Talking Movies
Comment number 962.
Bigger Soc14th December 2012 - 10:05
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 962)
Comment number 961.
ResCyn15th December 2012 - 12:25
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/user-guide-drugs-misuse-dec
Quite apart from the fact nobody I know who uses recreational drugs (I don't know anybody who uses hard drugs and that's the usual situation) was asked, I don't know they have the audacity to state drug use is down based on a door-to-door survey riddled with holes
Link to this (Comment number 961)
Comment number 960.
alexicon15th December 2012 - 11:38
The war on drgus has failed.
The real question here is:
Should we be allowed to do things that are not good for us?
if yes, then we should be ble to buy licensed drugs and the risk is ours. Also we must accept responsibility and accountablilty for what happens.
If no, then just how far does that go - how much should our choices be controlled.
Link to this (Comment number 960)
Comment number 959.
Norman Brooke15th December 2012 - 10:15
6. This government and the last one are experts themselves at appointing people who do not have any specialist or historical interest or expertise in the topic under review. This applied especially to Welfare when Blair appointed Frued, an ex-journalist and banker with NO knowledge of the subject to review it. Cameron now is putting draconian policies into place to suit ideology NOT reform.
Link to this (Comment number 959)
Comment number 958.
Lyall15th December 2012 - 9:41
Each drug should be looked at individually before legalization is considered but look at it this way people go on a night out drinking and end up fighting, then other people hang out with friends and smoke cannabis, they are calm and relaxed, no violence, but then people on heroin would rob their own familes to fund their next fix so people should look at the effects of each drug on people first
Link to this (Comment number 958)
Comments 5 of 962