Gas fracking: Ministers approve shale gas extraction


Cuadrilla CEO Francis Egan: "The country is running out of gas, our choice would be to develop our own shale gas resources"

Related Stories

The government has given the go-ahead for a firm to resume the controversial technique known as fracking to exploit gas in Lancashire.

The company, Cuadrilla, was stopped from fracking after two tremors near Blackpool.

Conditions have been imposed to minimise the risk of seismic activity.

In fracking, a mixture of water, sand and some chemicals is pumped into a well under high pressure to force the gas from the rock.

Energy Secretary Ed Davey said shale gas was a promising new potential energy resource for the UK. It might contribute significantly to energy security and substitute for imports which are increasing as North Sea gas is decreasing.

But he warned against over-excitement: "We are still in the very early stages of shale gas exploration in the UK and it is likely to develop slowly.

"It is essential that its development should not come at the expense of local communities or the environment. Fracking must be safe and the public must be confident that it is safe."

He said the government had uncovered management weaknesses in Cuadrilla following the minor earthquakes. These had been put right, he said.

He said impacts on water and local air pollution were already covered by the UK's existing "stringent" rules on oil and gas.

'Better solution'

Mr Davey said the advent of shale gas would not weaken the UK's legally binding targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions. He announced a study from the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) chief scientist David McKay on the impact of shale gas on climate change.

But he asked: "Is it not better that we produce gas in this country than gas shipped half way across the world?" He said his view was that, overall, greenhouse gases from shale gas in the UK might only be slightly greater than importing gas exploited in the conventional way.

In the US, exploitation of shale gas boom has sent energy prices tumbling, and the Prime Minister has expressed hopes that the UK can enjoy a similar boom.

But government advisers warn today that shale gas may be unlikely to bring down energy prices much in Britain.

In fact, the Committee on Climate Change warns that relying heavily on gas for future electricity supplies would leave households vulnerable to higher bills in the long run as the price of gas on the international market is volatile.

The UK won't benefit from substantially lower prices unless the rest of Europe decides to back shale gas too, as Europe has a gas grid that allows gas to be traded to the highest bidder.

The CCC has examined the potential impact on bills of different energy systems and predicts that subsidies to renewables and nuclear would put about £100 on household bills by 2020, but that by 2050 a gas-based electricity system might cost people as much as £600 extra.


Today's fracking decision has created political excitement as the Prime Minister the Chancellor and some business leaders have spoken enthusiastically about shale gas.

Environmentalists are more cautious following incidents in the US in which fracking has been associated with pollution of water through the chemicals involved in the process, as well as leakage of methane - a powerful greenhouse gas as well as a local air pollutant.


Nobody has ever attempted hydraulic fracturing near Westminster. But it has caused several tremors during the past year. To the surprise of many, the Conservative energy minister Charles Hendry was sacked in the autumn reshuffle. He said it would be unwise to "bet the farm" on shale gas. In his stead came John Hayes, who promptly told the Conservative Party conference that shale gas represented a "huge opportunity".

The Prime Minister and the Chancellor have matched the rhetoric. David Cameron has said he wants the UK to join the "gas revolution taking place across the world". George Osborne announced a consultation on tax breaks for the industry last week -- well before today's moratorium was lifted.

But their keenness to see fracking in the UK has come up against a hard rock, in the shape of the Liberal Democrat Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey. He has agreed to the lifting of the moratorium, but only with the addition of controls on seismic risks. "I don't think anyone would describe me as a frackhead," he told MPs this morning.

They say fracking will generate much more opposition in the UK than it has in the US as it involves turning green fields into industrial sites.

They also worry that an abundance of domestic gas will tempt politicians to abandon targets for cutting greenhouse gases, which are rising inexorably globally to the alarm of scientists.

A poll suggested that people would prefer to have wind turbines on the horizon than gas rigs.

Steve Radley, Director of Policy at EEF, the manufacturers' organisation, said the UK should do whatever possible to keep energy costs down: "This is a major threat that needs to be addressed now as we cannot continue to load industry with costs which are in excess of our competitors.," he said.

Caroline Flint MP, Labour's Shadow Energy Secretary, said: "Labour has always said that fracking should only go ahead if it is shown to be safe and environmentally sound. If the Government believes that this is the case then we will look carefully at their proposals.

fracking graphic

"But the idea that this form of gas extraction can have the same impact here in the UK as it has had on gas prices in the United States is considered wishful thinking by most experts."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 487.

    This is by no means a sustainable industry; shale gas is a fossil fuel like any other. But what it does give us is time; time to plan for a more sustainable future. Right now our sustainable energy industry is small and inefficient, but the discovery of new fossil fuels will, if the government is competent enough to do so, give us time to build up our sustainable energy capacity.

  • rate this

    Comment number 184.

    Of all the commodities humans need to survive, water is the most important. To poison it beyond human consumption for a commodity (energy) that we have plenty of alternatives for is idiotic.

    Yet again greed wins over common sense.

  • rate this

    Comment number 89.

    At last. Signs of sense on long term energy policy. Long overdue, and the glimmerings of an escape from the renewable energy surcharges that blight our stratospheric fuel bills.

    Or alternatively we can remain dependent on insecure foreign supplies, and keep sending our young soldiers to die in vain attempts to protect our energy sources from unstable, hostile regimes.

    Let's get fracking.

  • rate this

    Comment number 88.

    Good news. This could revolutionise UK industry, fix our balance of payments, lower our gas bills and bring employment to deprived areas.
    The technology is still developing but we'll never know till we try will we?
    Back it and lets see. Best approach really.

  • rate this

    Comment number 25.

    At what point do we finally recognise the fact the fossil fuels are not viable long-term? Do we have to wait until the last few drops of oil are extracted from some inhospitable corner of the globe?

    As our elected representatives are in the pockets of the energy industry, it would appear so.


Comments 5 of 6


More Science & Environment stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.