Is cycling getting more dangerous?

 
Shane Sutton (left) and Bradley Wiggins Shane Sutton (left) and Bradley Wiggins were both involved in collisions that left them injured

Related Stories

After cycling champion Bradley Wiggins and British cycling head coach Shane Sutton were caught up in collisions with cars within hours of each other, how sure can cyclists be that they are safe on Britain's roads? And what can they do to protect themselves?

Just hours apart, two high-profile cyclists experienced first hand the dangerous side of the sport they love.

Reports came in on Wednesday night that Bradley Wiggins, the Olympic gold medallist and Tour de France winner, had been involved in a crash near a petrol station near Wigan, Lancashire. He suffered bruising.

And on Thursday came the news that Shane Sutton, the GB cycling head coach, had bleeding on the brain after a bike crash in the Manchester suburb of Levenshulme. He is still in hospital.

BBC sports news correspondent Dan Roan says it is "astonishing" that the pair suffered the same fate in separate incidents within hours of each other.

And cycling fans agree - many have taken to Twitter in the past 24 hours to describe their shock that two cyclists at the top of their game could be left in hospital.

Although this was undoubtedly an unfortunate coincidence, the incidents suggest that even the most experienced cyclists are not immune to the dangers of Britain's roads.

But just how dangerous is cycling? And is it becoming less safe?

'Not pleasant'

John Meudell, South East representative for CTC, the national cycling charity, says: "Cycling has become more dangerous because of the number of vehicles on the road - it has become more intimidating because motorists give you less and less room.

"One thing it isn't these days is pleasant."

'Life-threatening injuries'

Nigel Barclay, 45, from Banstead, Surrey, suffered life-threatening injuries when he was knocked off his bike by a car in March this year.

"I sustained two broken legs, my pelvis was broken in two places, my arm was broken, my elbow was smashed and I had multiple skull fractures," he says.

Mr Barclay suffered brain damage and is now deaf in one ear and partially sighted in one eye.

"I spent 12 days on life support. They were saying to my wife that they didn't know if I would survive or not," he says.

The teenage driver's punishment was four points on his licence, and Mr Barclay says the magistrates "let us down horrendously".

He adds: "The message it puts out is that it's OK to knock a cyclist off."

Figures from the Department for Transport (DfT) show that last year 107 cyclists were killed on British roads. In 2010, that figure was 111. It is likely most were male, the DfT says.

But since 2004, the figures show a gradual decline in the number of fatalities, which would suggest that the roads are becoming a safer place for those on two wheels.

However, a look at the figures for deaths and injuries combined paints a slightly different picture.

Although that figure hovered at about 16,000 between 2004 and 2008, since then it has steadily risen. Last year it was 19,215 - 2,030 more than in 2010.

And, according to figures collated by the Times - which has run a high-profile cycle safety campaign since one of its reporters was hit by a lorry and left in a coma - 104 cyclists have been killed so far this year. It is a figure the DfT cannot confirm but the newspaper says that this year's death toll looks set to overtake last year's.

Mr Meudell, who lives in Dorking, Surrey, and has been cycling for 50 years, says he believes a lack of interest "at all levels of government" has caused the roads to become increasingly dangerous.

"It is complacency on the part of the highways establishment," he says.

"Despite all the statements that they are improving, they are doing the opposite. The only way we are going to have progress is to have an independent inspectorate of roads like they have in America."

'Sorry, I didn't see you'

Roger Geffen, campaigns and policies director at the same charity, is concerned about a different type of complacency - among drivers.

"We see this sort of attitude that when drivers hit cyclists or indeed pedestrians... that it's just somehow an accident, it's somehow carelessness," he says.

CYCLIST ROAD DEATHS BETWEEN 2004 AND 2011

  • 2011: 107
  • 2010: 111
  • 2009: 104
  • 2008: 115
  • 2007: 136
  • 2006: 146
  • 2005: 148
  • 2004: 134

Source: Department of Transport

"The legal system doesn't adequately respond. I know so many cases - whether it's eight-year-olds, 80-year-olds, champions, children, whatever - cyclists of all ages and backgrounds and all levels of skill, being hit by drivers who then sort of say, 'Sorry mate, I didn't see you'."

He says the courts treat it as such and drivers "get slapped wrists".

"We shouldn't be accepting that sort of attitude," he says.

However, cyclists can also be to blame, sometimes by breaking the law.

The Institute of Advanced Motorists found that 57% of cyclists had jumped a red light at least once, with 14% doing it regularly or sometimes, in an online poll of 1,600 people earlier this year.

It found the main reason given was because it was safer to get ahead of other traffic but more than half of those polled (54%) also felt cyclists needed to improve their behaviour.

Brian MacDowall, spokesman for the Association of British Drivers, says safety depends on respect and responsibility on the part of all road users.

"Putting blame on one type of road user will not help make the roads safer," says Mr MacDowall, himself an avid cycling fan.

Former British cyclist Michael Hutchinson, now a journalist at Cycling Weekly, highlights a different approach.

"There have been suggestions that perhaps the driving test could include not only more instruction on cyclists but perhaps even a cycling module where new drivers have to pass a cycling test before they're allowed to drive a car," he says.

Cycling safety

  • Make eye contact with drivers so you are sure they have seen you
  • Fit a bell or horn to your bicycle, and use it to alert other road users
  • Show motorists what you plan to do in plenty of time - always look and signal before you start, stop or turn
  • Don't cycle too close to the kerb - further into the road you will avoid drain covers and roadside debris, and on narrow roads it can prevent dangerous overtaking by drivers
  • Be aware there are blind spots all around large vehicles - it's often safer to hang back
  • Do not use headphones or a mobile phone while cycling
  • Always wear bright clothing in the day, and reflective gear at night. It is against the law not to use lights in the dark
  • Road safety charity Brake advises wearing a helmet

Sources: NHS Choices, Transport for London, Brake

According to CTC, the national cycling charity, which quotes figures from the 2001 census, 43% of the population own or have access to a bicycle, while about 750,000 use a bike to get to work. However, these figures are no doubt much higher now.

Kaya Burgess, who is leading the Times's Cities Fit for Cycling campaign, is in no doubt that much more needs to be done to keep cyclists safe.

"It's awful that it takes such high-profile accidents for cycling safety to be so high up the agenda, but what we are calling for is that the roads in Britain just need to be improved for cyclists," he says.

He says that until this happens we will only see more incidents.

Road Safety Minister Stephen Hammond says cycle safety is "very much at the heart of transport policy".

"The government is fully committed to encouraging cycling and improving safety and recently launched the first THINK! cyclist campaign," he says.

"We have also invested £30m to tackle dangerous junctions for cyclists and are giving more than £1bn to councils to design solutions appropriate to their local transport challenges, including improving their road infrastructure to encourage cycling.

"We have also made it simpler for councils to put in place 20mph limits and install mirrors to improve the visibility of cyclists at junctions. We will continue to work with our partners, including British Cycling, to do everything possible to encourage cycling and improve safety."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • Comment number 235.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 234.

    I notice a number of comments about car drivers using mobiles which is something that I deplore, its illegal, and many drivers are found guilty. But surely it should be just as illegal for cyclists, should'nt it? I seen many a cyclist using their mobiles, or with headphones on so that they can't hear whats going on around them. They're just as bad. Everyone needs to concentrate on the road.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 233.

    When I was a kid (back in the 70's) I used to cycle everywhere, local street roads and our local bypass which was the main A27 coastal road and busy even in those days.

    We rode our bikes without any fear. The reason I managed to survive without any accidents was that other road users gave you time and space.

    It can still be done, its down to other road users to give cyclists the same today.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 232.

    #20 widgeon
    "Cycling on a pavement is illegal, but is one of those laws that are never enforced."

    Speeding is illegal; driving with fog lights on when it is not foggy is illegal; using a 'phone when driving is illegal. But none of those laws are ever enforced.

    Now you and I both know that those claims of yours are quite false.
    You do the cycling fraternity no favours by stating such rubbish!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 231.

    one thing I've noticed is that people like to make up lots of extra rules for cyclists, dog owners on cycle tracks really love making up extra rules for cyclists to ensure they don't obey any themselves & SOME car drivers like making up extra cyclist rules for the road to absolve themselves from behaving with consideration on the road

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 230.

    @217.Aperson
    There's definitely two sides to this.
    yes of course there are bad cyclists, I saw one with no lights (+ dark clothes) tonight, madness
    but its worth remembering that cyclists are limited in their signalling ability, if they're turning or braking then they need both hands on the bars

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 229.

    The 2004 Local Transport Notes on Walking and Cycling document had an annex D Code of Conduct Notice for Cyclists which recommends "As a general rule, if you want to cycle quickly, say in excess of 18 mph/30 kph, then you should be riding on the road." i.e. if you're reasonably fit, don't use the cyclepath!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 228.

    Cyclists, motor bike and scooter riders, private motorists and commercial drivers will only adhere to good behaviour and courtesy if they feel they will be caught for not doing so.

    As we appear to have a non existent police force (the opinion where I live) we will continue to see an ever increasing risk of accidents, injury and death on our roads.

    No police presence will mean even more grief.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 227.

    Judging by the number of idiot drivers there are on the roads, it's quite obvious that the driving test needs to be made more vigorous.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 226.

    I gave up on my bike ages ago , it was terrifying to be in traffic cycle tracks are used as dog runs and toilets and its almost as dangerous as roads , but having said that when i lived in Bristol the Bristol to Bath cycle track along the disused railway line was brilliant very well used and well kept . its a pity really because cycling if great, but we are an old country and our roads are narrow

  • Comment number 225.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 224.

    Cycling on todays roads is EXTREMELY dangerous

    I only cycle when I must, and never by choice

  • Comment number 223.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 222.

    Cyclists are not purer than pure. Admittedly I work in a University town and students aren't known for their common sense, but even this evening in the rush hour at 6 pm in the dark in a 15 minute walk I was passed by three cyclists on main roads wearing dark clothing on dark coloured bikes with no lights. I feel a need to yell at them. Cyclists like this are complicit in their own accidents.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 221.

    What complete and utter rubbish some of you are posting here, like 90% of cyclists I drive a car. When I drive do I group myself with the teenage idiot who careers across the road? Of course not, no sooner than I group myself with the fools that cycle through the evening rush in Reading with no lights and regard for their own safety. We all need to take a bit of time and respect others.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 220.

    Unless I missed it,surely it's not just the increase in cars etc, but the matching increase in cycling whether for choice/health/or financial reasons and people being late due to traffic congestion or indeed being paid a very low hourly rate or no basic at all for courier,skip,deliveries etc,this can only add to less considerate driving!

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 219.

    207.
    Oh Lord Please
    Yeahbut ... speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles! If I do 35mph on my bike in a 30mph zone, I am breaking no laws - unlike the cars that overtake me! [RTRA 1984, Sec 81, "It shall not be lawful for a person to drive a motor vehicle on a restricted road at a speed exceeding 30 miles per hour". Rules about dangerous road use do apply, so I'm careful when I do it.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 218.

    one of the few cycle lanes near me always has cars parked on it tho the houses have driveways
    cycle paths (long narrow dog toilets) are unusable due to dog owners who refuse to obey most basic walking/dog control rules. they have huge maintainance costs & are also used as an excuse not to have more cycle lanes/facilities on the roads

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 217.

    There's definitely two sides to this. I ride a motorbike to work every day and while I empathise with the cyclists in my city and see near misses from aggressive cars fairly frequently, I also regularly have to come to an abrupt stop quite often when cyclists ignore red lights or veer across lanes without signalling. So essentially idiots are the problem, not the vehicle they are in charge of.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 216.

    @209 Sounds like you just need to take your car to a track if you display such arrogance & Arrogance in your post as you do your driving

 

Page 1 of 12

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.