Jimmy Savile: BBC regrets dropped Newsnight investigation

 

The director general said the Newsnight investigation should have continued

A Newsnight investigation into sexual abuse claims against Jimmy Savile should not have been dropped, the BBC's director general has told MPs.

But George Entwistle told the Commons culture committee he did not believe management pressure had led to a report on the former presenter being shelved.

Culture Secretary Maria Miller said "very real concerns" about public trust in the BBC have been raised.

Nine claims of sexual harassment involving BBC staff are being probed.

But Mr Entwistle said there was not enough evidence to say whether sexual abuse or harassment at the corporation was "endemic".

Mrs Miller has written to the chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, to stress that the corporation's investigations into itself should be conducted "thoroughly".

In his response, Lord Patten said Mrs Miller knows "how seriously the trust takes the allegations", and added the inquiries would be "comprehensive and independent".

"Some of these cases have been passed to the police where appropriate, and we are reviewing others within our normal HR processes and procedures," it said in a statement.

In a two-hour appearance before the committee, Mr Entwistle said a "broader cultural problem" at the BBC in the past had allowed the abuse by Savile, who regularly appeared on British TV in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

A number of key issues were raised during the director general's grilling.

  • He said he had been told about the Newsnight probe while he was head of BBC Vision, but added he did not press for more details as he did not want to show "undue interest" in a news issue
  • He insisted Newsnight editor Peter Rippon had decided to drop the Savile investigation "on his own account" and there was "no external pressure"
  • Conservative MP Philip Davies told Mr Entwistle he needed to "get a grip" on his organisation, after he failed to tell them how many allegations of sexual harassment had been made against BBC employees past and present
'Gravely serious matter'

Mr Entwistle told MPs: "There is no question that what Jimmy Savile did and the way the BBC behaved in the years - the culture and practices of the BBC seems to allow Jimmy Savile to do what he did - will raise questions of trust for us and reputation for us.

"This is a gravely serious matter and one cannot look back at it with anything other than horror, frankly, that... his activities went on as long as they did undetected."

Police have launched a criminal investigation into Savile, who died last year aged 84.

They have described him as a predatory sex offender and believe he may have abused many people - including young girls - over a 40-year period.

On Monday, the BBC's Panorama programme reported on the abuse allegations against Savile as well as the decision by Newsnight last December to drop its investigations into the claims.

"I came away from Panorama firmly of the view that that investigation, even if in the judgement of the editor it wasn't ready for transmission at the point he was looking at it, should have been allowed to continue," Mr Entwistle said.

Asked whether there had been pressure from management on Newsnight to drop its Savile investigation, he said there was no evidence of this and denied any BBC cover-up of the allegations.

He said Peter Rippon had become convinced that examining whether police had failed properly to investigate Savile was crucial to airing the Newsnight report.

Director of news Helen Boaden warned Mr Entwistle about the Newsnight investigation into Savile.

BBC home editor Mark Easton said Mr Entwistle portrayed an "almost baffling" system at the BBC.

"He talks about the situation where the head of television felt unable to talk to the head of news about an investigation which might have a direct impact on his Christmas schedules.

"I think people will find it very odd that you have what he called the 'referring up' structure - you don't have a refer across - so you have to go a long way up to come back down again.

"And that can make the BBC - I think people in the corporation would agree - sometimes a bit flat-footed. Outside people might say it makes them look a bit daft."

After Mr Entwistle made his appearance, Channel 4 News said it had obtained an email written by Liz MacKean - the Newsnight reporter responsible for the investigation - claiming Mr Rippon tried to "kill" her story with "impossible editorial demands".

Ms MacKean wrote to a friend to say her editor had told her Savile's alleged victims "were teenagers, not too young... they weren't the worst kind of sexual offences."

A BBC spokesman said "it would not be appropriate to comment" on Ms MacKean's email until a review by former head of Sky News, Nick Pollard, had concluded.

In his blog earlier this month defending his decision to pull the probe, Mr Rippon said he was "guided by editorial considerations only", adding some of the team "disagreed strongly with [his] judgement" while others "agreed equally strongly".

But on Monday the BBC issued a correction to some specific elements of the blog, calling it "inaccurate or incomplete in some respects", and the director general told MPs this was a matter of "regret and embarrassment".

Mr Entwistle said he had asked Mr Rippon to step aside because of inaccuracies in the blog.

But he said that he believed, "to the best of the evidence we have been able to assemble", the explanation now being offered for the dropping of the Newsnight report was accurate.

An independent inquiry led by former Sky head of news Nick Pollard will examine whether there were any failings in the BBC's management of the Newsnight investigation.

Christmas schedule

Mr Entwistle was asked about a brief conversation with BBC director of news Helen Boaden last December about the possibility of Newsnight running their report about Savile, while Mr Entwistle, as then BBC director of Vision, was planning Christmas tribute pieces to the presenter.

Jimmy Savile Savile died in October 2011 aged 84 having previously denied allegations he was a paedophile

"The key message I took away was that it wasn't yet clear to Helen whether it was going to stand up or not," he said.

"I wouldn't have had any qualms about making any changes we needed to make to the Christmas schedule."

Asked whether he now regretted running the tribute programmes for Savile, Mr Entwistle told MPs: "In the light of what's happening, of course I do."

He added that the Panorama programme pointed to the BBC's health as a media organisation, rather than being a "symptom of chaos", because it showed the organisation's capacity to investigate itself.

He said no other news organisation in the world would do this.

Later Mr Entwistle emailed BBC staff to pledge the corporation was "determined to be open and transparent, however painful it may feel at times"

He added: "It is only by opening ourselves up that we can restore and maintain the trust of our audiences."

On Monday, former Court of Appeal judge Dame Janet Smith will begin a review into the culture and practices of the BBC during Savile's time at the corporation and will also examine if the BBC's child protection and whistleblowing policies are fit for purpose.

Savile graphic

Jimmy Savile was a man with a high profile public persona, built on decades of broadcasting and charitable work.

He was seen as a flamboyant eccentric but is now accused of years of sexual abuse.

Culture secretary Mrs Miller wrote to Lord Patten: "We have talked about the paramount importance of full public trust in the BBC's inquiries and agreed that it is essential that licence fee payers can be assured that they are being conducted thoroughly and with the full co-operation of the BBC."

Lord Patten replied: "You have recognised both the credibility and the scope of those who are leading the inquiries and the wide scope of their terms of reference."

But he issued a warning that the government should not wade into the row: "I know that you will not want to give any impression that you are questioning the independence of the BBC," he said.

The Panorama programme, Jimmy Savile - What the BBC Knew, is available on the BBC iPlayer.

 

More on This Story

Jimmy Savile scandal

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1246.

    1226 But who do you see as Arbuckle?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 1245.

    Money Observer...

    I`ve been watching Order and Disorder on Beeb 4...very aposite...a programme on the concept of information...

    Jolly good s`well...a programme only the Beeb would make..

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 1244.

    It's not only the BBC who have to answer why Savile got away with things for so long, the printed media had the stories but backed off too. Savile was a bully and he chose his victims well. He knew they would not testify against him in court if anyone in the BBC or other media tried to expose him.

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 1243.

    I have 2 daughters & feel sick this man was not exposed before, the BBC is too policaly correct & worried about what "people" think of this organization; what they will now think is "How many other cover ups' have there been?" The answer is we'll never know!

  • rate this
    -8

    Comment number 1242.

    Don't agree this is nothing to do with the license fee. The TV tax is under written by law, unlike every other tax there are no concessions for elderly or disabled. An end the the license fee is a cut to the tax payer of 1/2 billion paid to the BBC by the DWP for "concessions". So you all pay, like it or not, even if you are on benefits, its a bit less to fund the BBC. This means accountability.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1241.

    1229 Name Number 6
    Good to see that you are not that "right on" or prejudiced against News International that it doesn't stop you still buying The Sun every day. Lol!

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1240.

    Are we seriously meant to believe that the BBC were the only news agency aware of the story? All these other agencies just get to throw wood into the fire and claim they are whiter than white!

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 1239.

    1230. Brownandsmelly

    Like phone hacking this has got looooooong legs and will run
    Hacking a phone of anybody, alive or dead, is light years from paedophilia.
    +++
    For God's sake Rupe, give it a rest

    1234. MoneyObserver
    We can add that they ditched the Open University which broadcast high quality educational material
    +++
    Open university much more accessible now on line, still produced by BBC.

  • rate this
    -8

    Comment number 1238.

    That, an organisation such as the BBC, has allowed, throughout its’ history people such as the current ghost , to hi-jack and to take away the gloss, shined by many innocents, is a shame and insult…BBC don’t plead innocence – Ross & Brand weren’t impressive - £ 6,000,000 (salary) time to get rid of the TV Licence.

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 1237.

    Only reason Cameron is keeping this going is to distract us from the DODGY Torries it will not work we will remember at the election

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 1236.

    "Name Number 6
    Is it just coincidence that since this story broke all the page 3 girls have been in their mid 20's as opposed to the usual mix of 16 and 17 year olds?"

    Have they been? I haven't a clue. It's been years since I looked. I have to accept your clearly expert opinion. How long have you been listing the ages of Page 3 girls?

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1235.

    1230. Brownandsmelly
    Hacking a phone of anybody, alive or dead, is light years from paedophilia.
    ////////
    Yes, but the difference is that a whole corporation including top executives were behind the hacking, it was almost a policy, whereas Savile was an individual, who wouldn't have behaved differently had he worked for any other employer.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 1234.

    Re Name No.6
    re pointlessness of BBC which duplicates pap on other channels and has dumbed down its Education output.
    We can add that they ditched the Open University which broadcast high quality educational material - completely at odds with what the BBC has become and how it views its role.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 1233.

    1216 Shakespeare..

    This isn`t a resheduled programme...It`s not the Rev. V. Awdry and his eponymous Fat Controller...

    It`s a blog that no-one attaches much importance too...it`s frequented by Jeremy Kyle wannabee`s with the odd sane bod thrown in fer balance..

    Neither is it `Othello and the eponymous Lago ( master of manipulation )

    Get some fresh air..

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 1232.

    1221.sieuarlu "BBC is supposed to present the culture, the nature, the face of Britain to the rest of the world. What will people say when they see something like this happened?"

    They'll probably say "We have evil men too" - some of them will think about times (perhaps still ongoing) when women & children were not heard, or their pain discounted. I'm happy we care enough to cover this in the UK.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 1231.

    1216.shakespeare17

    Are you sure that its not just that you find it hard to believe that some people are mature enough to take a balanced view rather than adopt a mob like baying for blood mentality?

    Or that they are compassionate enough to think that those who might have been victims deserve better than the agenda chasing henchmen or bandwagon climbing trolls.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 1230.

    1217 Lee44
    Like phone hacking this story has got looooooong legs and will run for some time and - like NI - the BBC will be permanently, possibly terminally, damaged by it. Hacking a phone of anybody, alive or dead, is light years from paedophilia. You may not want it to be but 99% of people know it is! And the 1% who don't? Oh dear me.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1229.

    Is it just coincidence that since this story broke all the page 3 girls have been in their mid 20's as opposed to the usual mix of 16 and 17 year olds?

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 1228.

    The DG was ill prepared, unable to answer a lot of questions and unfamiliar with his staff. And totally and clearly out of his depth when faced with a few junior MPs? They even laughed at him? He is responsible for the organization and doesn't know the scripts of news documentaries? This person commands a wage in excess of £1/2 million pa? He was a joke?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 1227.

    1211.
    riff77
    17 Minutes ago

    @1202.RMG3

    I take it you and your wife thoroughly investigated the "rumours" and weirdness you were aware of back then, and then took your evidence to the relevant authorities?

    No? Why not?


    1) I wasn't there, I didn't say I was.
    2) My wife was a trainee, who would have believed her?

    There were similar 'rumours' about Gary Glitter.

 

Page 9 of 71

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.