Jimmy Savile: BBC regrets dropped Newsnight investigation


The director general said the Newsnight investigation should have continued

A Newsnight investigation into sexual abuse claims against Jimmy Savile should not have been dropped, the BBC's director general has told MPs.

But George Entwistle told the Commons culture committee he did not believe management pressure had led to a report on the former presenter being shelved.

Culture Secretary Maria Miller said "very real concerns" about public trust in the BBC have been raised.

Nine claims of sexual harassment involving BBC staff are being probed.

But Mr Entwistle said there was not enough evidence to say whether sexual abuse or harassment at the corporation was "endemic".

Mrs Miller has written to the chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, to stress that the corporation's investigations into itself should be conducted "thoroughly".

In his response, Lord Patten said Mrs Miller knows "how seriously the trust takes the allegations", and added the inquiries would be "comprehensive and independent".

"Some of these cases have been passed to the police where appropriate, and we are reviewing others within our normal HR processes and procedures," it said in a statement.

In a two-hour appearance before the committee, Mr Entwistle said a "broader cultural problem" at the BBC in the past had allowed the abuse by Savile, who regularly appeared on British TV in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

A number of key issues were raised during the director general's grilling.

  • He said he had been told about the Newsnight probe while he was head of BBC Vision, but added he did not press for more details as he did not want to show "undue interest" in a news issue
  • He insisted Newsnight editor Peter Rippon had decided to drop the Savile investigation "on his own account" and there was "no external pressure"
  • Conservative MP Philip Davies told Mr Entwistle he needed to "get a grip" on his organisation, after he failed to tell them how many allegations of sexual harassment had been made against BBC employees past and present
'Gravely serious matter'

Mr Entwistle told MPs: "There is no question that what Jimmy Savile did and the way the BBC behaved in the years - the culture and practices of the BBC seems to allow Jimmy Savile to do what he did - will raise questions of trust for us and reputation for us.

"This is a gravely serious matter and one cannot look back at it with anything other than horror, frankly, that... his activities went on as long as they did undetected."

Police have launched a criminal investigation into Savile, who died last year aged 84.

They have described him as a predatory sex offender and believe he may have abused many people - including young girls - over a 40-year period.

On Monday, the BBC's Panorama programme reported on the abuse allegations against Savile as well as the decision by Newsnight last December to drop its investigations into the claims.

"I came away from Panorama firmly of the view that that investigation, even if in the judgement of the editor it wasn't ready for transmission at the point he was looking at it, should have been allowed to continue," Mr Entwistle said.

Asked whether there had been pressure from management on Newsnight to drop its Savile investigation, he said there was no evidence of this and denied any BBC cover-up of the allegations.

He said Peter Rippon had become convinced that examining whether police had failed properly to investigate Savile was crucial to airing the Newsnight report.

Director of news Helen Boaden warned Mr Entwistle about the Newsnight investigation into Savile.

BBC home editor Mark Easton said Mr Entwistle portrayed an "almost baffling" system at the BBC.

"He talks about the situation where the head of television felt unable to talk to the head of news about an investigation which might have a direct impact on his Christmas schedules.

"I think people will find it very odd that you have what he called the 'referring up' structure - you don't have a refer across - so you have to go a long way up to come back down again.

"And that can make the BBC - I think people in the corporation would agree - sometimes a bit flat-footed. Outside people might say it makes them look a bit daft."

After Mr Entwistle made his appearance, Channel 4 News said it had obtained an email written by Liz MacKean - the Newsnight reporter responsible for the investigation - claiming Mr Rippon tried to "kill" her story with "impossible editorial demands".

Ms MacKean wrote to a friend to say her editor had told her Savile's alleged victims "were teenagers, not too young... they weren't the worst kind of sexual offences."

A BBC spokesman said "it would not be appropriate to comment" on Ms MacKean's email until a review by former head of Sky News, Nick Pollard, had concluded.

In his blog earlier this month defending his decision to pull the probe, Mr Rippon said he was "guided by editorial considerations only", adding some of the team "disagreed strongly with [his] judgement" while others "agreed equally strongly".

But on Monday the BBC issued a correction to some specific elements of the blog, calling it "inaccurate or incomplete in some respects", and the director general told MPs this was a matter of "regret and embarrassment".

Mr Entwistle said he had asked Mr Rippon to step aside because of inaccuracies in the blog.

But he said that he believed, "to the best of the evidence we have been able to assemble", the explanation now being offered for the dropping of the Newsnight report was accurate.

An independent inquiry led by former Sky head of news Nick Pollard will examine whether there were any failings in the BBC's management of the Newsnight investigation.

Christmas schedule

Mr Entwistle was asked about a brief conversation with BBC director of news Helen Boaden last December about the possibility of Newsnight running their report about Savile, while Mr Entwistle, as then BBC director of Vision, was planning Christmas tribute pieces to the presenter.

Jimmy Savile Savile died in October 2011 aged 84 having previously denied allegations he was a paedophile

"The key message I took away was that it wasn't yet clear to Helen whether it was going to stand up or not," he said.

"I wouldn't have had any qualms about making any changes we needed to make to the Christmas schedule."

Asked whether he now regretted running the tribute programmes for Savile, Mr Entwistle told MPs: "In the light of what's happening, of course I do."

He added that the Panorama programme pointed to the BBC's health as a media organisation, rather than being a "symptom of chaos", because it showed the organisation's capacity to investigate itself.

He said no other news organisation in the world would do this.

Later Mr Entwistle emailed BBC staff to pledge the corporation was "determined to be open and transparent, however painful it may feel at times"

He added: "It is only by opening ourselves up that we can restore and maintain the trust of our audiences."

On Monday, former Court of Appeal judge Dame Janet Smith will begin a review into the culture and practices of the BBC during Savile's time at the corporation and will also examine if the BBC's child protection and whistleblowing policies are fit for purpose.

Savile graphic

Jimmy Savile was a man with a high profile public persona, built on decades of broadcasting and charitable work.

He was seen as a flamboyant eccentric but is now accused of years of sexual abuse.

Culture secretary Mrs Miller wrote to Lord Patten: "We have talked about the paramount importance of full public trust in the BBC's inquiries and agreed that it is essential that licence fee payers can be assured that they are being conducted thoroughly and with the full co-operation of the BBC."

Lord Patten replied: "You have recognised both the credibility and the scope of those who are leading the inquiries and the wide scope of their terms of reference."

But he issued a warning that the government should not wade into the row: "I know that you will not want to give any impression that you are questioning the independence of the BBC," he said.

The Panorama programme, Jimmy Savile - What the BBC Knew, is available on the BBC iPlayer.


More on This Story

Jimmy Savile scandal

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 686.

    541.againstlicensefee - "Stop the license fee now! The BBC is an institution with a guaranteed income and is unaccountable to no-one......"

    If it is "unaccoutable to no-one" it is therefore accountable to everyone.....

  • rate this

    Comment number 685.

    504 Peter:

    As 'head of vision' his Entwistle's duties included program commissioning:

    "The Television Commissioning process provides a strategic and robust decision making and reporting framework that supports the development and commissioning of content"

    In terms of content - the point is that the Newsnight program had ramifications for other programs due to be screened - and nothing was done.

  • rate this

    Comment number 684.

    Where's Patten in all this? What the hell is he being paid for if not to deal with top level matters at the BBC?

  • rate this

    Comment number 683.

    'Incompetence' is always a 'good cover'
    But why do us licence payers have to pay for it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 682.

    Disagree DG Entwistle honourably refused to scapegoat a subordinate (Rippon-Newsnight Editor).
    Rippon not toast just yet, but Entwistle moved him and toaster in close proximity of one another.
    Regards his own failings, surprise surprise, Entwistle thinks there none.
    Saville was big time "BBC Establishment" and they closed ranks.
    Will Rippon be offered a big pay-off to keep his mouth shut ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 681.

    "how it was that Savile still had access to children post Soham....."

    Because the system to close the loopholes in the CRB system was scrapped under the Coalition's "Red Tape Challenge" after coming to power, in one of their first acts......
    I think Savile's 'activities' pre-date the coalition and any cuts, nice try though.

  • rate this

    Comment number 680.

    Can we not see that cancelled Newsnight report now?

  • rate this

    Comment number 679.

    I'm pro-BBC and I support the current license model and, although these days there's hardly anything I can actually watch, I do listed to R3 and R4 (despite current attempts to dumb it down). I haven't given up on the BBC and I hope that these current machinations might lead to a rethink of the ratings chasing infantilisation culture and get the corporation back to its true values.

  • rate this

    Comment number 678.

    Maybe Jimmy Saville is guilty of some of the things he is accused of, maybe not. Seems strange though that there could really have been so many hundreds of victims and absolutely no one said anything at the time.

    Perhaps it is best to let investigations take their course before rushing director generals and others in front of the firing squad.

  • rate this

    Comment number 677.

    This man did horrible things to young people. For them, to see his image constantly shown on TV and Papers must be violating and horrible. I ask that from now on all editors use just his name. If you were a victim, seeing his face again and again, must almost seem like he has won, as he so loved to court publiicty. Just stop using his image. He doesn't deserve it and it causes hurt to his victims.

  • rate this

    Comment number 676.

    We cannot honestly impose todays laws on yesterdays society!
    If we do how far do we go back?
    This will open a pandora's box and the only winners will be the lawyers who have too much control over our lives as it is!
    Personally i would rather take this on the chin and not give these wolves more meat to feed on!

  • Comment number 675.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 674.

    I'm starting to ask myself "Is this the end of the BBC"?

  • rate this

    Comment number 673.

    It reminds me a lot of "Cromwells body" all of this. Why wait until after his death for all of this to come out? Unless the point of waiting is civil damages and trial by media, neither of which require proof beyond reasonable doubt.
    I understand about closure for the victims, but this is shaping up to be a massive class action damages suit fuelled by BBC rivals for political purposes.

  • rate this

    Comment number 672.

    @526. MRR

    Hopefully the victims will get some compensation - if not from Savile's estate, why not from the BBC?


    Where do you think the BBC gets it's money from?

    Any compensation will come out the pockets of the poor old licence fee payer.

  • rate this

    Comment number 671.

    It is obvious that Newsnight was shelved to save the Beeb's Xmas schedule which was stuffed with Savile eulogies. The big question now is why wasn't it shown in the New Year? Was the Savile 'brand' and its still functioning supporters that strong? Questions are being dodged even now, is the BBC's culture of whistleblower crucifiction that potent? This stuff goes all the way back to the early 70s!

  • Comment number 670.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 669.

    If Savile were around today I doubt he would admit to any wrong doing as he appeared to think what he was doing was OK. As far as I can see he seems to have thought that girls were fair game regardless of their age and he played on the fact that years ago girls were reluctant to report an adult for fear of not being believed. I'm surprised none of his family seemed to know what he was really like.

  • rate this

    Comment number 668.

    A ten second conversation is worrying from the DG.
    I'd expect a lot more responsibility from him

    Shoogly peg, I'm afraid.

  • rate this

    Comment number 667.

    The reason is that unlike you our country needs the BBC because of all the brillant tv/radio documentaries/eductaion/drama/sport........ it brings us in a near unbiased format compared to anywhere in the world. How you can equate this matter to judge the whole product is amazing - go live inthe US or China and live with the rubbish and biase then you might realise how lucky you are.


Page 37 of 71


More UK stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.