Do voters really want to choose their police commissioner?

 
Man with crowbar breaking into a house

With less than 50 days to go until elections for the new police and crime commissioners (PCCs) in England and Wales, there is growing anxiety that one of the government's flagship criminal justice reforms resembles a slow-motion car crash.

The introduction of directly-elected commissioners was hailed by its Conservative architects as a vital step in "giving people democratic control over policing priorities".

But there are questions as to whether our democracy is really going to deliver on this promise.

The Electoral Reform Society (ERS), along with 20 PCC candidates, has now written to the Home Secretary Theresa May warning of an impending disaster.

"These elections are in serious danger of descending into a farce," said Katie Ghose, chief executive of the ERS. "If the home secretary is serious about people having a say she needs to listen to the warnings coming from all sides and take action now."

The questions voters may ask

Q: Shouldn't we just have more bobbies on the beat?

A: Just having more people or responding more quickly to calls from the public does not necessarily reduce crime or reassure people. Patrolling on foot can reduce crime where it is targeted in crime hotspots.

And more Q&As below

The signatories warn that turn-out in the elections, due to be held on 15 November, may well be the lowest in modern political history. Last month the ERS projected that only 18.5% of voters would participate.

Among the ERS demands is for the government to pledge "never to hold a major election in the winter again".

The Home Office hopes public excitement about the opportunity voters are being offered to hold the police accountable may build in the coming weeks. But in a speech earlier this month, the new Policing Minister Damian Green hinted at government concern about voter apathy.

"I know that I have a job to engage the public with the policy of PCCs over the next eight weeks in order to persuade people to get out and vote," he said. "I personally, together with other ministers, will be going around the country to talk to as many people about the benefits police and crime commissioners can bring and why they should go out and vote."

At the moment, though, it seems doubtful this exercise will be held up as a model of how to empower local communities.

The PCC areas are huge. Some commissioners will represent the interests of millions of people - an electorate far greater than any MP. If turn-out really is as low as predicted, what does it mean for democratic legitimacy? In a tight vote, some candidates may claim a mandate based on support from less than one in 10 of the local population.

Start Quote

Never hold a major election in the winter again”

End Quote Electoral Reform Society

I don't think it is the paucity of leaflets and national marketing that explains lack of public interest in PCC elections. Nor can the likely low turn-out just be blamed on autumnal chill and drizzle.

There is a more fundamental question - does the public really want the responsibility of selecting the best person to set police priorities in their area?

Among the fervent few who organise fringe events at party conferences, the democratic deficit represented by "unaccountable police authorities" may inspire tub-thumping rhetoric. But I have to say it has not been a subject much discussed at my bus stop.

People are worried about crime, of course. But in a developed democracy like ours, one gets the sense that voters expect others to worry about the minutiae of public service delivery. They realise, perhaps, that policing is a complex business and it is questionable whether the electorate believes it is well placed to judge who has the best ideas on resource allocation for, say, domestic violence against rural crime.

Breaking a car window to steal a laptop More police won't necessarily help

I may be wrong. When the arguments over police priorities start to be played out in the letters pages of local newspapers, on the doorsteps and in the pubs, perhaps we will get the thoughtful and realistic debate government ministers clearly hope to inspire.

But there is a concern that, actually, public discussion will be dominated by familiar simplistic refrains - the answer to crime is "bobbies on the beat" or "zero-tolerance" or simply "more police". (See my previous blog on whether bobbies on the beat really cut crime.)

Speaking to PCC candidates, Damian Green recently made the point that "manifestos need to be credible, evidence-led and show innovative thinking". And on Thursday Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) did its bit to try and prevent the elections turning into an arms-race of impractical promises.

It raises the questions it suspects voters are likely to ask and then provides the best evidence on what works to cut crime.

Q: Shouldn't we just have more bobbies on the beat?

A: Just having more people or responding more quickly to calls from the public does not necessarily reduce crime or reassure people. Patrolling on foot can reduce crime where it is targeted in crime hotspots.

Q: What about zero tolerance - isn't that how they reduced crime in New York?

A: The New York police chief at the time has said that zero tolerance does not describe what happened, and that community policing and an organisational focus on crime reduction and quality of life issues were key.

Q: Shouldn't we just employ more police to cut crime?

A: A recent review of the literature commissioned by HMIC concluded that there was not enough evidence to say that higher numbers of police officers was the direct cause of lower levels of crime, although extra officers have the potential to cut some forms of recorded crime.

Q: Doesn't fear of being caught stop the criminals?

A: Recent survey research from the UK showed that the risk of being caught and punished was linked to lower levels of reported traffic offending (like speeding) but not other minor crime. For prolific offenders, the fear of being caught can reduce crime when combined with support interventions.

This idea is to help inform a more nuanced and sophisticated debate about police and crime. The HMIC sums up its conclusion saying that "focusing action on crime and anti-social behaviour hotspots, repeat victims, and prolific or high volume offenders is, therefore, an effective way to allocate resources for crime reduction".

It also makes the point that police officers charging around trying to look tough may well prove counter-productive. "By treating people equally, making decisions fairly, explaining them and being respectful, the police can encourage people to cooperate with them and not break the law."

I wonder, though, whether voters will brave the wind and the wet on 15 November to register their support for candidates who say they don't support more "bobbies on the beat", that zero tolerance is a myth, that resources should be skewed towards the poorer high-crime areas and that they want their officers to be nicer to people.

 
Mark Easton, Home editor Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 27.

    The title of Police Commissioner should be a meritocratic position granted to officer with the greatest experience and best track record.

    Not to the officer that can convince a voting populace that he'll keep the largest number of unrealistic promises to which he is no way accountable during his time in power.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 26.

    The government have no interst in democracy - indeed they represent some 30 odd % of the eligible vote under a discredited system.

    From what little I've heard, the candidates are going to be largely party political or with close ties: hmn.

    I cannot see the real purpose behind this (jobs for the boys?distraction?) but I'm sure there is an agenda here, there always is.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 25.

    Er, why should the role be politicised (in the hands of one person) at all?
    Was there something wrong with the Countywide structures? [A: No.]

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 24.

    Yet another level of welsh nationalism is just what the police DOESN'T need.

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 23.

    NO THE POLICE ARE NO GOOD AND THIS IS JUST ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF RUBBISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 22.

    I will be spoiling my ballot in November, and I hope others join me. I think it is utterly wrong to politicise the police in this manner. The day to day running of the police should not be done by a political party official. I also worry that this new structure will used by parties to dispense themselves of blame when their crime policies are failing.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 21.

    A politicised police force is a recipe for procrastination, indirection and corruption. Add to that list pet-projects, special-pleading and public relation campaigns rather than crime reduction campaigns. This policy is possibly the worst idea I have seen in a very long time.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 20.

    Utter rubbish indeed. Elected Mayors too. Funny how the Coalition is for this in the interests of democracy, but is also hell-bent on making the Commons less representative by messing around with boundaries and drastically reducing the number of representatives. This contradiction just says to me that there's a rat smelling somewhere.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 19.

    This will just politicise the Police in the worst possible way. We need more real accountability after the awful scandals on phone hacking, corruption and Hillsborough. The IPCC is nowhere near independent and tough enough when the Police misbehave. If the Police wish to continue to be held in high regard by the general public they need to change.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 18.

    Two hours to get 17 comments says it all really.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 17.

    Utter rubbish. Nobody wants this.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 16.

    What a fantastic idea this is and a great step forward for democracy. I predict there will be a massive interest and a huge turn out at the voting booths come November. This issue will spark great debate on the doorstep and personally I can't wait for candidates and literature to make their way to my door. Wish I could say more, but I have to go, the men in white coats are coming to take me away.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 15.

    This is a ridiculous idea. I wouldn't know who to vote for, and shouldn't have any say on it.
    Where do we draw the line on deciding who gets these jobs democratically? What if the public votes in a total idiot just cos they have an expensive and effective advertising campaign, but are no good at their job?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 14.

    forget police commissioners. new elections now!

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 13.

    #4 David Hoggard
    The Chief Constable of N Yorks did get £250k compenstaion when he was dismiissed for gross mis-conduct (helping a family member in recruitment). But this was not what the Police Authority wanted. They were bound by national agreements, which are being reconsidered already. A PCC would have had to make the same payment or face losing in court. Annoying though.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    It seems just another human shield for the Government. Just someone else to blame and fire if, or rather when something goes wrong. And will just end up as somewhere to for aging MP's who can't get into the House of Lords to wait out until their retirement or a consultant position at some multinational bank. I thought they wanted to save money?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 11.

    Why not have directly elected Government ministers rather than a pool of people chosen through the accident of a first-past-the-post electroal system ?

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 10.

    > Speaking to PCC candidates, Damian Green recently made the point
    > that "manifestos need to be credible, evidence-led and show innovative
    > thinking".

    Perhaps politicians should set an example and lead the way on this.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 9.

    In my opinion they will concentrate on city centre areas and the out laying areas will suffer as a consequence. As it is Police Stations are closing in these areas leaving Joe Public out on a limb, getting very poor service. It will get worse!

  • rate this
    +17

    Comment number 8.

    The politicisation of the police has to be one of the Bullingdon Mob's most ridicuolous ideas.

    Clearly Cameron and co have spent far too long reading the Daily Fail.

 

Page 6 of 7

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.