Hillsborough: Result of lazy 1980s prejudices

 

The families of the victims want fresh inquests and criminal charges

If Wednesday was about truth, today is about justice. The report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel opens up a new path down which the campaigners are set to march.

There is now a very real possibility of prosecutions of police officers or others found to have been involved in the systematic amendment of key statements to the original Taylor inquiry in 1989. A case could be made that this was an attempt to pervert the course of justice, trying to airbrush out the evidence of potentially criminal negligence.

It seems likely that the attorney general will apply for the original inquest into the tragedy to be quashed and a new one opened. Were that fresh hearing to come to a different conclusion to the accidental death verdict recorded at the time, that might also open the way to criminal prosecutions.

There have been suggestions that Sheffield Wednesday FC and the city's council might face allegations of corporate manslaughter, were it to be demonstrated that they were criminally negligent in failing to protect the fans that fateful Saturday.

The former Labour Home Secretary Jack Straw said on Thursday it was "a matter of great regret" that he did not do more during his time in office to investigate the claims of the Hillsborough campaigners, while arguing that it was the Conservative Thatcher government which had created a "culture of impunity" within the police.

Interestingly, a letter from Mr Straw among the 450,000 pages scrutinised by the independent panel suggests he was not immune to that culture. He wrote to the then Attorney General John Morris in early 1998, just as Lord Justice Stuart-Smith's report was due to recommend no new inquiry into Hillsborough. Below is an excerpt.

1998 letter from Jack Straw to John Morris

PDF download 1998 letter from Jack Straw to John Morris[53.7KB]

Referring to the amendment of statements by South Yorkshire Police, Mr Straw said: "There are bound to be questions, however, about whether anything in this process might amount to misconduct of a criminal or disciplinary nature. Lord Justice Stuart-Smith considers it would not. It would in theory be possible to instigate a further police investigation to confirm this conclusively, but I think the outcome would be a foregone conclusion, and I do not consider that such an investigation should be instigated."

The disaster and its despicable aftermath were the consequences of lazy 1980s prejudice: that football was the preserve of yobs and drunks (this was an era when managing football crowds saw public order put before public safety) and that Liverpool was the city of rebels and chancers, with a reputation for harbouring a grievance.

It was useful for the authorities that there was a grain of truth in these simplistic portraits, caricatures that could be exploited by those engaged in official calumny.

Mark Easton on the devastating verdict on the police and emergency services

Even 10 years on when New Labour was looking to challenge what they saw as the crusty old establishment, the home secretary dismissed Liverpool's desperate pleas for a judicial inquiry.

Today those frames of reference have completely altered. Football, for all its faults, has won its reputation as "the beautiful game" and Liverpool can proudly boast it is a city of European culture.

The Hillsborough disaster and the fight for justice is now a tale that will be woven into the folk history of our islands. But it is a narrative that will be adapted to fit two competing liturgies.

More on the Hillsborough papers

Names and ages of the victims on a memorial

For some, it represents a rare and famous victory in the epic struggle of the down-trodden working class against a corrupt and contemptuous elite. In parts of Liverpool and beyond, the dead of Hillsborough will be held up as martyrs to the cause of British socialism.

For others, the story is about the spirit of the individual against an arrogant state machine, the citizen who takes on the system. Through this prism, the 23-year long march for justice for the 96 will be held up as a victory for British liberal values.

There is always a tension between citizens with a grievance and an establishment safeguarding its authority. The question is, perhaps, whether official promises of openness, honesty and accountability from our public institutions are more credible today than they were back in 1989.

The families of Jean Charles de Menezes, Ian Tomlinson and Mark Duggan will have their own views. The hope must be that in 2012 our systems are better at ensuring that truth will out and the path to justice will be short.

Arrows show direction of crowd into stadium 1430-1440: Several thousand Liverpool supporters are gathered outside the ground at the Leppings Lane end. Decrepit turnstiles mean admission to the ground is slow.
Shows crowd surging through gate into pens 3 and 4 1450: Pens 3 and 4 on the stand's lower terrace are full. Their official combined capacity was 2,200, though it is later discovered this should have been reduced to 1,600 as crush barriers did not meet official standards.
Crowd surges through newly-opened exit gate 1452: Police order Gate C - a large exit gate - to be opened to alleviate the crush outside the ground. Around 2,000 supporters enter the ground and make for a tunnel leading directly to pens 3 and 4.
Crowd continues to fill pens 3 and 4 1459: The influx of fans caused severe crushing in pens 3 and 4. Fans being climbing over fences to escape. It is later estimated that more than 3,000 supporters were admitted to the central pens, almost double the "safe" capacity.
Fans trying to get out of pens 3 and 4 1500: Match kicks off. Five minutes later, a crush barrier inside pen 3 give way, causing people to fall over. Supporters climb perimeter fences or are dragged to safety by fans in the stand's upper tiers.
As before, crowd trying to get out of 3 and 4 1506: Match stopped by referee. Some 730 people are injured, 96 fatally. In the chaotic aftermath, supporters desperately try to resuscitate the injured.
 
Mark Easton, Home editor Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

When we look, we find

Sexual abuse of children was, until relatively recently in Britain, rarely discussed in public. Now, hardly a day goes by without some new horror hitting the headlines.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 129.

    110

    Easton is just a New Labour spun mouth-piece.
    Police officers in attendance on the day will be used as scapegoats when the situation was out of control and game should have been cancelled.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 128.

    @ 126. You really need to explain yourself. What do you think LFC fans did that day that was unlawful? You clearly have a massive problem and I suspect you are very young, or have some learning difficulties?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 127.

    @116 Thanks for the link Kuta. I do take the point which is why I have long said that the occupiers of the ground (SWFC?) have been lucky to avoid far greater criticism. @ 117 - I haven't read yesterday's 395 page report and nor have you. I will though, as I have read the Taylor reports. I think you will find that the crowd dynamics at the gate are a legitimate subject of enquiry.

  • Comment number 126.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 125.

    @Sspx - there were many previous problems at the Leppings land end. Just ask Spurs fans who were there in 1981 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtzHVe2mEN0

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 124.

    What a coward Jack Straw is to blame Margaret Thatcher - he should look to his own shameful failure to expose the truth.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 123.

    @118: read the report for an proper answer to your question! There was no unlawful behaviour from Liverpool fans. A gate was opened that shouldn't have been and there was a tragic crush as thousands moved into space to escape the crush outside. The lack of organisation and sensible policing, and the decisions made that day by the police were major factors in the disaster.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 122.

    SSPX is doing Manchester United fans' image no good at all with his obvious hatred, prejudice and bile. Pity,because they're 99.9% much better than him.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 121.

    @118 - Forest had the Kop end with fewer supporters, better access, more turnstiles. LFC had Leppings Lane. It's all there in the report. Just read it.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 120.

    Time for accountability and Justice for 96 my heart goes out to their families and god bless you for your undying devotion to justice for your loved ones YNWA

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 119.

    The 1980s were days of the absence of corporate responsibility, abetted by the state and clouded in secrecy. In 1989 alone there was a disastrous King's Cross fire (31 killed)-- cause, smoking allowed underground, flammable substances left under escalators AND the Herald of Free Enterprise capsize (193 killed), bow doors left open, owners not bothered to fit CCTV. In the 2010s it's the hospitals.

  • Comment number 118.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 117.

    95. InterestedProfessional

    "Would I like to join you?" In the real world that part meant (sorry but the shortage of letters =less explanation)

    READ THE REPORT & I repeat

    Why arent these brilliant observations of yours even mentioned or being hid behind by the guilty? after all these people will be fighting for their careers & possibly jail.

    If they dont think it holds water ..why do you? Nite

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 116.

    @InterestedProfessional - Orderly queues were almost impossible.The turnstiles were simply incapable of allowing that many ticketholders into the ground without a crowd building up. Previous semis there had 100s of fans were still entering the ground 15 minutes or more after kick off, and in one case the k.o. was delayed. Please have a read of hfdinfo.com if you get chance. It might help explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 115.

    109

    And the truth of your agenda reveals itself.

    The report and official documents totally dismiss what you say.

    Read it, enlighten yourself, engage brain.

    Then, and only then...comment

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 114.

    @SSPX: have you even read the report or any summaries? Are you choosing to ignore what reasonable, sensible people are accepting as fact? What about the Liverpool fans 12 months earlier in the semi-final? You've conveniently forgotten them but nothing happened then. You're just trying to find an outlet for your hatred of Liverpool fans, while not caring about who you annoy, anger or even hurt.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 113.

    @109. - it's all there in the report, you just need to read it. But you won't,....or can't. Not sure which.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 112.

    BUT the fans that lost their life's that tragic day were let down by a ground not fit for animals, incompetent procedures and now proven corrupt police force not their own supporters behaving exactly the same as any other team in the land in 89 trying to get into and enjoy a semi-final. cont...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 111.

    @107 IntProf
    Sorry, but that's rubbish.
    I'll debate it all day with you, but I won't sit here and regurgitate 450000 pages of evidence or the contents of the report. I'm afraid you'll have to do that yourself. I've a good friend who's brain-damaged and another who has been having weekly conselling for 23 years and we've been blamed for it for all these years.
    READ IT!

    jft96

    YNWA

  • Comment number 110.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

 

Page 8 of 14

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.