Green belt development 'not path to economic growth'

 
Countryside The CPRE claims about 1,000 hectares of green space is earmarked for new housing and industrial areas

Related Stories

Building on green belt land "is not the path to lasting economic prosperity", countryside campaigners have warned the government.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England has claimed countryside around English towns and cities is threatened by bids to build about 81,000 homes.

Recent changes to the planning system have prompted concerns that protection for the green belt will be weakened.

A government spokesman said it was committed to protecting green spaces.

The CPRE has suggested that current proposals, which are either out for consultation, submitted for planning permission or have been approved, would cover an area of unspoilt countryside the size of Slough in Berkshire.

Start Quote

Ministers have consistently maintained that they value the green belt - now is the time to put these words into action”

End Quote Paul Milner Senior planning officer for the CPRE

These plans include the expansion of Birmingham Airport, proposals for three freight terminals, an open cast coal mine in Nottinghamshire and a hotel and golf course in Surrey.

'False promise'

The campaign group added that about 1,000 hectares (2,500 acres) of land was earmarked for business parks and housing developments.

CPRE senior planning officer Paul Miner said the government should look to regenerate urban areas rather than build on unspoilt green space.

"It [the green belt] helps regenerate our cities and stops them sprawling into rural areas. As a result no-one is ever too far from true, green English countryside.

"In times of economic slowdown, politicians can sometimes be tempted by the false promise of an easy construction boom. But destroying the countryside is not the path to lasting economic prosperity."

Mr Miner said that "sustainable economic improvement" was only possible by "the sort of urban regeneration that has already done much to rejuvenate many of our largest cities."

"Ministers have consistently maintained that they value the green belt and want to see it protected. Now is the time to put these words into action," he added.

In March 2012, the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) published a new planning framework which included a section ensuring green belt land is protected.

A draft version of the framework was amended to encourage greater development of brownfield sites, following pressure from the CPRE and other countryside campaign groups.

'Green lung'

Ministers said the policy, along with the Localism Act, gave communities a greater say on planning and scrapped "top-down targets".

However, the CPRE warned that the document puts pressure on local authorities to allow building in the green belt to meet housing and expansion targets.

A DCLG spokesman said: "The green belt is an important protection against urban sprawl, providing a 'green lung' around towns and cities.

"The coalition agreement commits the government to safeguarding green belt and other environmental designations, which they have been in the new National Planning Policy Framework.

"The Localism Act allows for the abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies which sought to bulldoze the green belt around 30 towns and cities across the country."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +21

    Comment number 232.

    My local area has over 2000 empty homes, not ones for sale, just empty and unused. There is enough derelict commercial property that will house the whole of the county homeless. It's about time this government got to grips with rebuilding the towns and not expanding outwards.

  • rate this
    +27

    Comment number 189.

    So many more things could be done before considering building on any green belt land. Especially since we'll need it for the new era of rising food prices to become more self-sufficient again.

    - deal with empty houses, by repossession if necessary
    - brownfield developments / building reuse
    - let the house price crash happen so people become more realistic about living expectations again

  • rate this
    -34

    Comment number 187.

    There is plenty of land. I say again: There is plenty of land. Stop claiming it needs to be protected for this (crops) that (aesthetics) or the other (greed) when it isn't at risk. Population, prices, and vested interests are the cause not an eroding countryside that simply isn't being eroded as there is so much of it unused.

  • rate this
    +26

    Comment number 182.

    A planning officer once told me "A developer is someone who wants to build a house in the countryside, a conservationist is someone who's already got one".
    However, we'll destroy our crop producing land at our peril. Surely new development should be close to jobs, transport, shops etc otherwise fuel usage and resource depletion will continue to grow.

  • rate this
    -30

    Comment number 108.

    The green belt keeps housing high priced. At this time when the nation is on its knees we need to relax planning and get house building back on the menu. This would stimulate the economy and get people back to work. First time buyers need housing they can afford without punitive income multiples to pay back. This is why France and Germany do well they have affordable housing for all.

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

  • RihannaCloud caution

    After celebrity leaks, what can you do to safeguard your photos?


  • Cesc FabregasFair price?

    Have some football clubs overpaid for their new players?


  • Woman and hairdryerBlow back

    Would banning high-power appliances actually save energy?


  • Rack of lambFavourite feast

    Is the UK unusually fond of lamb and potatoes?


  • Members of staff at James Stevenson Flags hold a Union Jack and Saltire flag UK minus Scotland

    Does the rest of the UK care if the Scots become independent?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.