A defining moment for Britain

Person waving Union Jack How do you pin down national identity?

Only rarely do countries get the opportunity to describe themselves to a watching world. Today's Olympic opening ceremony is a defining moment for this country - literally.

But trying to pin down national identity is always a difficult and dangerous occupation - even more so if your chosen medium involves marshalling 1,000 people, nine geese and 70 sheep on a sports field.

The man who has taken on that challenge, film-director Danny Boyle, accepts that in looking to please everybody he is "bound to fail". His aim is to put on a show in which the vast majority of Britons can say they found "something of themselves".

He understands the risk that in portraying itself, Britain might be seen as backward looking, wallowing in its past, nostalgic for the "good old days". Boyle admits he has been alert to the beguiling nature of what he calls "muffin moments".

Equally, a portrait of Britain that hopes to discover national character in London buses, Marmite soldiers and faded celebrities risks being glib and shallow.

There is a balance to be struck between the "pomp and punk" faces of Britain, as Boyle has put it. The United Kingdom is a land of contradiction and paradox and tonight's show will only be true to this country's complex personality if it celebrates both.

Fireworks over Olympics stadium after dress rehearsal for opening ceremony Fireworks were seen over the Olympic stadium after a dress rehearsal

We love the disciplined order of ceremonial and pageantry. But we resent any authority that tries to herd us into line.

We are profoundly proud of our art and invention - the land of Shakespeare and Newton, Darwin and Dickens. But we also revel in the quirky, the absurd and downright daft - the land of Monty Python and Mr Blobby, the Sex Pistols and Little Britain.

Boyle has said the show needs to be "idiosyncratic". He is right - that is a defining characteristic of my country. Austerity may have done us a favour - it would have been quite wrong for London to have attempted to match the extravagance and grand uniformity of Beijing's ceremony four years ago.

Not for us regimented orthodoxy on a vast scale. We celebrate individuality and incongruity. It is that quality which underpins this country's tolerance and sense of fair play. Britain likes to see itself as the little guy standing up to the bully.

Olympics coverage online

Olympics images

Tonight's show needs to reflect our history: the journey from rural economy through industrialisation and urbanisation to regeneration and a reconnection with our bucolic past is a central thread within the tapestry of the nation.

Tonight's show needs to reflect our creativity: our writing, our song, our invention are all key to this country's personality and development.

But, for me, the ceremony must also be witty and whimsical. It needs to include plenty of jokes at our own expense - some of which the rest of the world may never understand. It should not be too obvious.

In defining Britain to the rest of the world and ourselves, tonight must see a show that is sometimes anarchic, often contradictory and occasionally baffling.

Because that is the kind of people we are.

Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

We need Miss Marple

Is it so crazy to suggest that someone looks to see if their neighbour's stolen vase is offered for sale at the local car boot?

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 51.


    The point I am making is that at a certain point in time the discussions have to end: someone has to make a decision.

    I didn't particularly care about some of it but in the end the boss is the boss. Artie types tend to be rather unsophisticated Lefties but they can do spectacle rather well. We saw a spectacle: that's all.

    I would have started with Oliver Cromwell but The Queen was coming.

  • rate this

    Comment number 50.


    CND, Chakrabati, revisionist multicultural pre-industrial british agriculture.

    What I call politics is how (some) people see the country?

    Of course - I acknowledge that.

    But many others don't see it that way.

    Therefore my point - rather than making a spectacle we could all have got behind, it only served to emphasise division.

  • rate this

    Comment number 49.


    What you choose to call the politics is how a lot of people see the country. We could all draw up a list of items to disagree over but we weren't running the show and at a point you have to go forward with something.

    To a degree I am glad there was a focus on the NHS. The whole world appreciates our system of medical treatment free on demand.

  • rate this

    Comment number 48.


    Mrs.S, a dyed in the wool monarchist, also remarked about Her Majesty looking at her nails. I retaliated that HM is The Queen, so she can do what she likes: that is the point, isn't it? To me HM looked tired: she is 86 and it was very late in the day. I am not a monarchist but I like The Queen. We need to treasure her more.

  • rate this

    Comment number 47.

    Entry of the athletes/drummers: good.

    Thing with the petals/flame: excellent.

    Shame about the politics - a lot of it just rubbed our noses in the division which afflicts C21 disunited kingdom.


Comments 5 of 51



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.