Striking while the iron is cool

 
Staff picket the entrance to Stirling Castle

Allow me to begin with what will be dismissed by many as a ludicrous proposition: there are some in the government who are privately disappointed that today's protests are not much bigger.

Yes, of course I know that the last thing ministers say they want is disruption and strikes that cause widespread inconvenience and make the job of deficit reduction even harder.

But if there is a surprise at the action today, it is that we haven't seen more of it. And as I shall explain, I think for some in Downing Street, that is a bit of a worry.

When the budget cuts were announced back in 2010 there was an acceptance that austerity, once it started to bite, would be greeted by widespread public anger. Government unpopularity at this point in the cycle was a given and the big question was how the British population would make their fury felt.

For a moment last summer, people wondered whether the English riots were the start of it. But it quickly became clear the looting and disorder had very little to do with cuts or welfare reform.

Then the focus shifted to the Occupy movement - was that going to be the rallying point for broad-based public anger? It would appear not.

The small-scale rallies and demos which pop up on the front page of local papers don't seem to be part of an identifiable protest movement. Today's national strikes over pensions and the police march over conditions of service seem to reflect the narrow self-interest of public workers rather than the vanguard of a more general outcry.

Those out on strike include...

Strikers at Stirling Castle
  • Job centre, border and tax office staff
  • Health visitors, pharmacists and paramedics
  • Lecturers and other staff in colleges and new universities

At first sight this might suggest to some that the government has "got away with it". Britain feels more resigned than furious at the impact of austerity. Although the coalition took a kicking in last week's local elections, if the nation really wanted to scream their opposition to cuts and reforms, why did two-thirds of the electorate in England not even bother to vote?

And this must worry David Cameron and some of his closest advisors. Why? Because we have a prime minister whose central mission is the idea of building an active citizenry.

He wants to see armies of armchair auditors checking on public spending and creating a fuss if they don't like what they see; he wants grassroots activism to shape planning and development; he wants real power to flow from the Whitehall elites to the ordinary Joes and Josephines in parishes and wards; he wants a Big Society where citizens get involved in their local communities.

Instead, some of his advisors privately despair at a population that appears to count the cost of democracy rather than understanding its value.

My guess is that they imagined the pain of the cuts would wake people up to their democratic rights. While disagreeing with those who oppose their policies, of course, I suspect they thought this period in our politics might also represent an opportunity to rouse a populace that has come to regard itself as consumer rather than citizen.

David Cameron may pat himself on the back for so successfully making the case that deep public sector cuts are a necessity. But there may also be part of him that is disappointed the argument was so easily won.

 

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 203.

    It is obvious that things get pushed thru whether you agree or protest or not. Anybody remember protests against the Iraq war. Not this administration but.. It is painfully obvious that there is no growth but the first thing which is trotted out by GO&DC is we are going to press ahead on the same old road. This government seem to forget that when in opposition they supported much that got us here.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 202.

    "He wants to see armies of armchair auditors checking on public spending and creating a fuss if they don't like what they see;"

    He's not the only one & when we do - we'll check that all at BBC paying their taxes properly - INCLUDING YOU!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 201.

    It's good to see that Cameron's attempted divide and conquer tactics aren't working.

    We are ALL affected by banker greed and incompetence, whether we work in the public or the private sector. The only people not affected are the fatcats, and their politician enablers.

    And for the record, I work in the private sector, and I am not a union member. Nevertheless, I anticipate down arrows :-)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 200.

    The apathy seen in the lack of support for the public sector mirrors the same in last week's election turnout because below the conscious surface where people don't normally explore, there is a deep vein of disillusionment with democracy, politics, the public sector, the economy and the global economy. We all feel powerless and at the mercy of reckless, greedy and self-serving authorities.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 199.

    196 Silly reason, many job losses will occur in local councils, how these are achieved and what priority on spending will be are all locally determined and will be decided by your local council.
    Cuts will occur for all , it is a shame local politicians spent more time moaning about things they do not control and not dealing with how they will deal with the things they will have to deal with.

 

Comments 5 of 203

 

Features

  • NS Savannah, 1962Nuclear dream

    The ship that totally failed to change the world


  • Espresso cup7 days quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Glasgow 2014 quaichs and medalsQuaich guide

    What do the Scottish gifts given to Games medallists symbolise?


  • Malaysian plane wreckage in UkraineFlight risk

    How odd is it for three planes to crash in eight days?


  • israel flagDos and don'ts

    Can you criticise Israel without being anti-Semitic?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.