~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~12~RS~)
Unite union to discuss fuel tanker deal
Panic buying led to fuel shortages
The Unite union will meet next week to discuss a proposed deal aimed at ending the fuel tanker drivers' dispute.
The deal was tabled on Friday following six days of talks between the union and officials from six distribution firms.
The threat of a strike over safety, pay and working conditions resulted in panic buying at petrol stations.
About 60 union representatives from across the country will discuss the deal and have until Friday to accept the proposals or announce a strike.
Both sides have agreed that the details of the deal will remain confidential.
Outside the headquarters of the conciliation service Acas, the assistant general secretary of Unite, Diana Holland, said the talks had been "intense and complex".
She said: "We have done as much as we can and we have a document we now can discuss. But we will keep the process confidential until the people who matter make the decision."
'Resolve dispute'BBC transport correspondent Richard Westcott described it as "big step forward" but added that the big sticking point appeared to be pay.
He said it was unlikely the talks among union delegates would begin on Monday, because no venue had yet been chosen to host the discussions.
Diana Holland, Unite: ''We have worked together constructively''
They will either accept, reject or demand changes to the deal, and have until Friday to do so.
Unite represents 2,062 tanker drivers, covering 90% of supplies to forecourts, and is calling for minimum standards of pay, hours, holiday and redundancy.
Alan Davison, representing the tanker companies, said: "We are now in a position where we have a final set of proposals and hopefully we can resolve this dispute."
Peter Harwood, of Acas, said he was pleased with the result following two weeks of talks.
He said: "Acas has been shuttling between the parties and the process has been a long and challenging one. But we are pleased to announce that a set of proposals have been reached."
Under rules governing strikes, the union has to give seven days' notice of any industrial action.
Earlier on Friday, the union had been given an extension to its deadline for declaring strikes so that talks could continue.
Under employment law, the union should have made a decision by late afternoon on whether to call its members out on strike after they voted last month for industrial action.
The Department for Energy and Climate Change said it welcomed the possible deal.
A spokesman said: "We hope that this will lead to the threat of strike action being lifted. The government continues to believe that any strike action is wrong and unnecessary."
There were chaotic scenes at garages across the UK earlier this month as people queued for petrol after the government advised motorists to top up their tanks.
The government faced criticism that its advice had caused panic buying.
Army drivers have been trained to deliver fuel to petrol stations in case of a possible strike.
'Invisible' poor children let down 
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Jumpstarting Motor City
Renegade reporter
Patchy record
Baby on board
On the move in Mumbai
Comment number 122.
milvusvestal14th April 2012 - 11:32
Whatever the result of these negotiations, there is one thing we can all be certain of - and that's that fuel prices will continue to spiral in the longer term unless motorists re-think their behaviour. I accept that many motorists need their cars to commute to work, but driving sensibly & reducing non-essential travel will cut down fuel demand and maybe peg pump prices for a little longer.
Link to this (Comment number 122)
Comment number 71.
2squirrels14th April 2012 - 10:18
I hope the safety issue has been cleared up and that the drivers have the sense to vote for no strike action. A strike of this nature would bring chaos to this country and very bad feeling if the army were brought in that is not their job. It is time all these matters had to be discussed for say 6 months before strikes were allowed and if not settled in that time the 2 parties Gov/un be blamed.
Link to this (Comment number 71)
Comment number 58.
GT197314th April 2012 - 9:54
The Unite union say this strike is about safety. The industry has a good safety record and the Health and safety executive seem to be satisfied with the standards in the industry. I expect the Government to continue with its contingency planning, it is the Governments job to keep this country moving and not to allow the Unions to further destroy our economy.
Link to this (Comment number 58)
Comment number 36.
chewho14th April 2012 - 9:23
Quite likely this was always going to be resolved without a strike, threats of which are a routine part of negotiations but do not usually become news. All the chaos came through a huge over-reaction from the govt: - making a big deal of training the army to drive tankers and then panicking people with the bad advice. A blatant attempt to demonise the union for political reasons which backfired.
Link to this (Comment number 36)
Comment number 31.
cat14th April 2012 - 9:16
Being a redundant tanker driver myself, it is easy for everyone to say it is about pay but there are no pay negotiations being held here! Drivers have annual or bi annual agreements and these are not being discussed at these talks.
Talk of the previous strike... What strike? I think they will find that was fuel protesters that caused the country to grind to a halt nothing to do with tanker drivers
Link to this (Comment number 31)
Comments 5 of 7