Government urged to allow airport expansion

Runways at Heathrow Airport The letter says London must improve its links with emerging economies like China

Related Stories

Seventy business leaders, MPs and trade unionists have called on the government to support airport expansion, including at Heathrow.

In a letter to the Sunday Telegraph, they say: "With the economic recovery so fragile, we cannot afford to cut our country off from growth and jobs."

The government has ruled out a third runway at Heathrow, but says it is exploring all other options.

A review of airport capacity is due to report later this month.

The letter to the newspaper includes the signatures of Len McCluskey, the general secretary of the Unite trade union, and Simon Walker, the director general of the Institute of Directors.

It claims Heathrow airport is falling behind Paris and Frankfurt, which, it says, offer 1,000 more flights a year to the three largest cities in China.

Emerging markets

"There are 21 emerging market destinations with daily flights from other European hubs that are not served from Heathrow," the letter points out.

Start Quote

As the chancellor made clear in his autumn statement, we will explore all the options for maintaining the UK's aviation hub status with the exception of a third runway at Heathrow”

End Quote Department of Transport

The letter does not explicitly refer to a third runway at Heathrow, in west London, but suggests expansion is essential.

"There is a huge opportunity for the UK to lead in connectivity to growth markets, but we need a hub solution that has the capacity to compete if we are to seize it," the letter says.

"Growth won't wait - while there are more ambitious long-term projects for aviation that can be examined, in the near term Heathrow must continue to be part of the solution if the UK is not to miss out on vital trading opportunities.

"With economic recovery so fragile we cannot afford to cut our country off from growth and jobs."

In its coalition agreement, the government said it would cancel plans for a third runway at Heathrow and refuse permission for additional runways at Gatwick, in Sussex, and Stansted, in Essex.

The decision followed widespread opposition from councils, residents and green groups. The Conservatives and Lib Dems had both opposed the plan in opposition, preferring improved rail links instead.

Thames estuary

A spokeswoman at the Department of Transport told the BBC: "As the chancellor made clear in his autumn statement, we will explore all the options for maintaining the UK's aviation hub status with the exception of a third runway at Heathrow."

Transport Secretary Justine Greening is expected to announce a new airport capacity review later this month, including the possibility of a new airport on reclaimed land in the Thames estuary.

In January a group of more than 30 Conservative MPs called on the coalition to rethink the decision to rule out a third runway at Heathrow.

But in October Ms Greening said she would not reconsider a third runway at Heathrow, and Labour has also said it is "off the agenda".


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 141.

    Completion of a third runway at Heathrow as soon as possible is essential and a no-brainer. All the other alternatives such as an Estuary hub will take too long to develop, but may be a solution in the longer term. The problem is that the UK needs a competitive hub right now and a third runway at Heathrow is the only viable interim solution.

  • rate this

    Comment number 122.

    Why not expand at Farnborough Airport? It's close to Heathrow, has a direct link to 1) Mainline stations direct to Waterloo, Basingstoke, Gatwick and Reading! 2) M3/M25 transfer to Heathrow connections, and most importantly, wont need much investment as its already operating as a commercial airport. I think we have a winner! (and I was born and still live here in Farnborough!)

  • rate this

    Comment number 117.

    Air travel is expensive in environmental terms, therefore my view is that business people should utilise the excellent web conferencing facilities available today. Improvements to train travel should have a higher priority than aviation needs. Be innovative business brains that's what you're supposed to do not lobby for poorer air quality, cynics!

  • rate this

    Comment number 114.

    For me, the third runway at LHR is a no brainer. We need a larger airport, its makes sense to expand an airport which has already been invested in with the new T5 and soon to be new T2. Yes the village of Sipson may disappear and i do feel for the local residents, but its a small price to pay. The environmental impact and cost will be far greater in building a brand new airport.

  • rate this

    Comment number 66.

    I cannot see why we need another airport, but we do need a better infrastructure to our transport needs, London already has 4 airports, 2 are capable of increasing size, with less damage to society. By building another, will just increase housing in another area, and in 20 years we will be making the same suggestions as today. Hence we need longer term planning.


Comments 5 of 8


More UK stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.