London 2012: 13,500 troops to provide Olympic security


Scale of Olympic military protection revealed

Related Stories

Up to 13,500 military personnel will help to provide security at the London 2012 Olympic Games, the Ministry of Defence has announced.

Security would be police-led but the military would make a "significant contribution", the MoD said.

Some 5,000 troops will support the police, up to 7,500 will provide venue security and 1,000 will provide logistical support.

Last week, ministers revised the Games security budget from £282m to £553m.

In addition to the 13,500 figure, there will be a 1,000-strong unarmed contingency force ready for deployment in the event of an "Olympics-related civil emergency".

Venue protection

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it now estimated 23,700 security staff would be required at Olympic and Paralympic venues next summer, more than double the original estimate of 10,000.

In a written ministerial statement, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said that the MoD would be increasing the specialist support work during the Games that it routinely provides for the civilian authorities - such as bomb disposal, building search teams and specialist sniffer dogs.

London 2012 - Begin your journey here

London view

In addition to the 5,000 personnel allocated to that role, some 3,500 would provide venue security.

This figure would rise to 7,500 on peak days during the Olympic Games, he said.

The MoD said the servicemen and women would be on hand across the UK to protect 150 venues and training sites.

And as part of the military's Olympic security role, the Royal Navy's HMS Ocean and HMS Bulwark will also be based at Greenwich, in London, and Weymouth Bay, in Dorset, respectively.

Specialist skills

Mr Hammond told the BBC that the Games were "the biggest security challenge this country has faced for decades".

But he added that military deployment during Olympic Games was routine since the 1996 Atlanta Olympics.

"This defence contribution is on a similar scale to that deployed at other recent Olympic Games and will contribute to ensuring a safe, secure and enjoyable 2012 Olympics," he said.

"Defence will continue to be able to support current and contingent operations during the Games and my priority will remain the troops we have deployed on operations, including in Afghanistan, before, during and after the Olympics."

Mr Hammond also said the military would split its role into two areas.

"First of all we will be providing the routine military aid to the civil power - helping and supporting the police, with things like special forces, bomb disposal capability, military search capability.

"And then we'll be supplying up to 7,500 men and women to support the guarding of the venues themselves.

"They'll be working with civilians in mixed teams, searching and checking people going into the stadiums, making sure - airline style - that nothing that shouldn't get in there gets in."

On Newsnight Mr Hammond stressed that the extra military staff would not carry weapons: "They will be unarmed and will be working alongside unarmed security guards and unarmed volunteers. The police and if necessary, military support to the police would be available if any threat arose," he explained.

The defence secretary also said the military would be using its full range of capabilities and equipment to "keep London safe during the Olympics".

He added: "Military hardware will be used, we'll be deploying helicopters, we'll be deploying Typhoon fighters to defend London's airspace, we'll be deploying ground-to-air missile systems."

Military 'pride'

Lord Dannatt, a former head of the British Army who used to advise the Conservative Party on defence matters, believes service personnel will be pleased to be involved with the Olympics.

"It's not like Afghanistan," he said. "That's been a rolling operation for a long time, 10,000 soldiers there for six months at a time.

"This is going to be a relatively short deployment and I think, as Philip Hammond said, the soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines who are involved actually will be... I think very proud to be part of this spectacular, once-in-a-generation operation to showcase London and showcase the UK."

Conservative MP Patrick Mercer, a former officer in the British army, said the move underlined the importance of having sufficient military capacity to fulfil unforeseen tasks.

He told the BBC: "We have a limited number of police officers. You can't necessarily employ close protection officers or other security officers in this role.

"But it makes me wonder why we continue to talk about reducing the armed forces, particularly in terms of manpower, when these sorts of tasks come up at relatively short notice."

Labour's shadow defence minister, Russell Brown, said: "There can be no compromise with security at the Olympic Games and we support the deployment of UK troops.

"The British people will want to know everything possible is being done to protect their safety.

"It is important we know where these troops will be drawn from and whether there will be any impact on ongoing international efforts."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 451.

    nothing new in this, they used the army in the early 70's to empty dustbins in Glasgow, and then they used us in 77 to cover the fireman's strike in Yorkshire and all over Britain, we enjoyed it, that was until we found out the strikers were getting more strike pay than we were getting as wages, £25 a week we were getting as a wage. I hope they will pay the army a bit extra.

  • rate this

    Comment number 441.

    I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, the armed forces are better trained than the usual security staff you get at events, but on the other hand, do we really want to project an image of armed soldiers at sporting events? I suppose steps could be taken to make them blend into the background, but that would reduce their effectiveness. And did the budget controller moonlight as a bank CEO?

  • rate this

    Comment number 427.

    Once more our government can delve into a seemingly bottomless pit of money, at the drop of a hat, to fund wildly exacerbated demands for security at a largely unwanted event that this country simply cannot, in reality, afford.
    It makes me tend to think that our parliamentarians have not quite been telling the whole story from the beginning about the state of our finances.

  • rate this

    Comment number 409.

    As a serving members of the armed forces I am disgusted by some of the anti-forces comments that have been posted. On the flip side I've been highly amused by some of the comments from those who 'know' the military's plans and capabilities. Seconds of internet research will show the 'battleship' HMS Ocean will not fire any missiles at anything.

  • rate this

    Comment number 78.

    OK....what are they going to do if the armed forces, cut to the bone now, are needed in a big way elsewhere? Calling up the TA always interferes with other things they do in their civilian life for a start.
    Did we need to spend so much on a sporting event? Greece did some may say!


Comments 5 of 8


More UK stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.