Nick Clegg warns European veto 'bad for Britain'

 

Nick Clegg says he is 'bitterly disappointed' by Mr Cameron's veto

Related Stories

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg says David Cameron's veto of EU treaty changes was "bad for Britain" and could leave it "isolated and marginalised".

But he blamed French and German "intransigence" and pressure from Eurosceptic Conservatives for putting the PM in "a very difficult position".

Initially Mr Clegg said the coalition was united over the use of the veto.

But he told the BBC he had "made it clear" to Mr Cameron it was "untenable" for him to welcome the move.

Sources close to Mr Clegg have told the BBC he "couldn't believe it" when he was told the summit in Brussels had "spectacularly unravelled".

The prime minister blocked changes to the EU's Lisbon Treaty at an EU summit, arguing that the proposed changes were not in the UK's interest.

It now looks likely that all 26 other members of the European Union will agree to a new "accord" setting out tougher budget rules aimed at preventing a repeat of the current eurozone crisis.

'Bitterly disappointed'

As leader of the Liberal Democrats, Mr Clegg is far more pro-European than his Conservative coalition colleagues.

Start Quote

The deputy prime minister claimed the outcome would have been different if he had been prime minister at the talks as he would not have to worry about Eurosceptic backbenchers”

End Quote

He told the BBC's Andrew Marr programme: "I'm bitterly disappointed by the outcome of last week's summit, precisely because I think now there is a danger that the UK will be isolated and marginalised within the European Union.

"I don't think that's good for jobs, in the City or elsewhere, I don't think it's good for growth or for families up and down the country."

He said he would now be doing "everything I can to ensure this setback does not become a permanent divide".

The deputy PM said he had learned of the veto in a phone call from the prime minister at 0400 GMT, shortly before Mr Cameron gave a press conference announcing it publicly.

Asked what his reaction had been, the Lib Dem leader said: "I said this was bad for Britain.

"I made it clear that it was untenable for me to welcome it."

'Unacceptable' demands

The new accord will hold eurozone members to strict budgetary rules including:

  • a cap of 0.5% of GDP on countries' annual structural deficits
  • "automatic consequences" for countries whose public deficit exceeds 3% of GDP
  • a requirement to submit their national budgets to the European Commission, which will have the power to request that they be revised

Mr Cameron has said he was seeking certain "safeguards" from Europe on protection of the single market and the UK's financial services industry.

Start Quote

Businesses are now desperate to hear a positive statement from Mr Cameron about how the UK's position in the single market can somehow be buttressed”

End Quote

But French President Nicolas Sarkozy called those demands "unacceptable".

Mr Clegg said unwillingness to negotiate from France and Germany, combined with "outright antagonism to all things European" from parts of the Conservative Party, had left Mr Cameron in a difficult position.

"He couldn't come back to London empty-handed because self evidently, if he'd done so, he wouldn't have been able to get whatever had been agreed through the House of Commons so all we would have had would have been a delayed crisis."

On Friday, a spokesman for Mr Clegg said he had been "consulted throughout" the 10 hours of unsuccessful negotiations in Brussels - a claim backed up by Foreign Secretary William Hague.

He told the BBC the Lib Dem leader was fully "signed up" to the decision to veto the proposed treaty.

'Better way forward'

Mr Cameron will make a statement in the House of Commons on his decision on Monday - and the Labour leader called on him to use it to "explain why he did something that was so bad for Britain and bad for British jobs".

"He did this because the Eurosceptic wing of the Conservative Party has effectively taken over and that isn't good for the national interest," Ed Miliband said.

"What I say to Liberal Democrats and others is that we will work with anybody who thinks this position cannot stand. We must find a better way forward for Britain."

Start Quote

Every time the bond markets twitch I can see the finger being pointed at those awful Anglo Saxons in the City of London”

End Quote Nigel Farage UK Independence Party

Mr Hague insisted Britain was "not marginalised", and told Sky News that while "everybody knows" that the Tories and Lib Dems had different views on Europe, the negotiating position taken by Mr Cameron "was agreed in advance" with Mr Clegg's party.

But Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott said his party's Business Secretary Vince Cable had "given a very serious warning last Monday in the cabinet against elevating these financial regulation points into a make or break deal".

Asked about Labour's allegation that Mr Cameron did not genuinely want to reach a deal in Brussels, Lord Oakeshott told the BBC's Politics Show he believed "a walk-out quite suited him".

Mr Cameron and his Chancellor George Osborne have insisted the veto was in part to protect the City of London from excessive intervention by Europe, but Labour and the UK Independence Party have both warned that actually no additional safeguards for it were achieved.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage said the City was "under very serious threat" of "retribution", adding: "Every time the bond markets twitch I can see the finger being pointed at those awful Anglo Saxons in the City of London."

The BBC's business correspondent Joe Lynam said it was not yet clear whether the City would be better or worse off in the long term.

But he said there was a risk that British banks could be affected by deals done by the remaining 26 EU member states which cannot be blocked as unanimity is no longer required except in the case of taxation.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +36

    Comment number 2096.

    I live in Finland. Last week one national newspaper ran a competition for people to design new Finnish Mark notes.
    It seems to me that the 2 powers of the EU say jump and everybody else has to ask how high.
    I don't think most of the Euro countries want to stay in the Euro but no one has the willpower to leave it and put what France, Germany and the banks say about this to the test.

  • rate this
    +46

    Comment number 1980.

    I fail to see how it will be bad for us. Switzerland is not a member of the EU and is doing fine and so is Norway. They can trade and they are not in a bad position. We should hold a referendum and be done with it and have trade agreements. I think that we should not be in it and then go against it, we should either be in or out and seen as how we resist them so much I think the answer is obvious.

  • rate this
    +140

    Comment number 1630.

    I can't believe this is still being discussed.

    Sarkozy needed the tax take from the City to try and save the euro. There was no guarantee that it would work; the only guarantee is that Britain loses £40bn per annum, for ever

    Cameron's job is Prime Minister of Britain. He is employed to look after Britain. There is a separate democratic (yeah right) process for the EU

    He was right to say no

  • rate this
    +103

    Comment number 1621.

    I am still at a lost to understand what catastrophic economic consequences the UK will have leaving the EU.
    At the moment we have approx £30bn trade deficit with the EU a year (half of that with Geramny) and a net cost of membership of approx £28bn a year (all government quoted figures.
    Based on this, the EU needs us far more than we need them, and would appear to have just cut its own throat.

  • rate this
    +39

    Comment number 1615.

    I've been reading the German media, and surprisingly it's one of the few Eurozone countries where there is some support for Britain's stand. But some have pointed out that much of Britain's disdain from a European treaty is owing to its nationalism throwing back to the War years (they cite DC's comparison with Churchillian Bull-dog). I wonder if there's some truth to it.

 

Comments 5 of 13

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

  • Alana Saarinen at pianoMum, Dad and Mum

    The girl with three biological parents


  • Polish and British flags alongside British roadsideWar debt

    Does the UK still feel a sense of obligation towards Poles?


  • Islamic State fighters parade in Raqqa, Syria (30 June 2014)Who backs IS?

    Where Islamic State finds support to become a formidable force


  • Bride and groom-to-be photographed underwaterWetted bliss

    Chinese couples told to smile, but please hold your breath


  • A ship is dismantled for scrap in the port city of Chittagong, BangladeshDangerous work

    Bangladesh's ship breakers face economic challenge


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.