Were the riots caused by bad manners?

 
Burning building Would better police manners have prevented the riots?

As Parliament, police and press have attempted to explain the cause of England's August riots in a series of reports over the last week, one surprising word has bubbled up to the surface.

No, it is not "criminality" or "underclass" or "greed". It is "courtesy" - or a lack of it from the police.

Today's Guardian /LSE Reading the Riots research reflects on how a "discourteous manner" from officers conducting stop and search in many of the districts where rioting occurred was a "significant factor in sparking the disturbances".

Last week's interim report from the government's Riots, Communities and Victims Panel found the same thing. "Many people told the Panel that police stop and search was consistently carried out without courtesy," their report to Ministers said. "The Panel calls on the police to work with communities and across forces to improve the way in which stop and search is undertaken."

And Scotland Yard's own reflections on the disturbance in the capital last week cited "a level of tension" among sections of the community that prompted the Met to note that stop and search must only be used "in an intelligent, professional, objective and courteous way."

In the immediate aftermath of the rioting and looting, it wasn't greater courtesy that people were calling for, but the introduction of water cannon, rubber bullets and exemplary punishment.

Prime Minister David Cameron called on the courts to be uncompromising in sentencing: "What happened on our streets was absolutely appalling behaviour and to send a very clear message that it's wrong and won't be tolerated is what the criminal justice system should be doing."

However, as the dust has settled, it appears that senior figures within government now accept that the causes of the August disturbances are complex and multi-faceted. Mr Cameron spoke in September of how some young people caught up in the riots had suffered from "a shortage of not just respect and boundaries but also love."

There is a growing body of evidence that, if you want people to obey the law, then the police must treat communities with courtesy, friendliness and fairness. The National Policing Improvement Agency published a fascinating report, Fair Cop, a few months ago which identified "treating people with respect" as a fundamental part of reducing crime.

"Trust enhances police legitimacy which, in turn, encourages people to help the police and not break the law. In other words, by making fair decisions and treating people fairly, the police should have an impact on crime in the longer term. The implications of motivating greater social responsibility are significant."

The findings went further, however, suggesting that respect was actually more important than catching criminals in getting people to obey the law. (I wrote about this phenomenon a couple of weeks ago.)

"Fair and respectful treatment predicted whether the public viewed the police as legitimate (rather than police effectiveness at responding to, and dealing with, crime)," the report said. It added that - with the exception of traffic offences - "the perceived risk of being caught and punished showed no statistical association" with offending behaviour.

This flow chart explains what they are on about:

Procedural justice model

It may be that the key lesson of the riots is about the importance of the principle of policing by consent. As the government's riots panel put it: "We have been told by a number of officers that they feel there has been a breakdown in one of the founding police principles: 'the police are the public and the public are the police'."

"In some communities, the police are no longer seen as members of the public who work full-time on duties which are also the responsibility of every citizen. Many people believe the police have significant work to do to rebuild trust and genuine cooperation."

Newsnight will broadcast an in-depth report - on the causes of the riots and how those who took part feel about the events - at 22:30 GMT on BBC Two on Monday 5 December.

 
Mark Easton, Home editor Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

More on This Story

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +31

    Comment number 1.

    It amuses me that this appears only a couple of weeks after a judge decided that swearing at the police was acceptable behaviour ...

    "Swearing at police is not a crime because officers hear foul language “too frequently” to be offended, a judge has ruled. ":

    http://tinyurl.com/6uq32wt

    One law for one and another law for the other?

  • rate this
    -60

    Comment number 2.

    It was clear at the time that the Police caused the riot by their actions in relation to the shooting of Mark Duggan. This was just the catalyst which triggered the deep rooted resentment of the police into criminal activity.
    It was also their poor response which helped to spread the violence.
    Why has it taken so long to realise this?

  • rate this
    +56

    Comment number 3.

    I laugh when I read anything that tries to make the riots sound anything more than the utter opportunist thuggery and looting that it was. The riots happened because an underclass of scum saw that the police were not able to do effectively anything and so they jumped at the chance to either cause damage or line their own pockets. That’s it. Plain and simple. There is nothing more to understand.

  • rate this
    +40

    Comment number 4.

    Oh how pityfull.
    Blame the police for everything yet who would these people call if they were burgled or had a criminal activity done to them?
    POLICE.
    Who, when the public are running away from an incident is running to it? POLICE.
    Once again people are looking for the easy option for putting the blame on, I notice it is never themselves that are at fault, always somebody else.
    Get a life.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 5.

    Policing by consent is rather tricky when a large number of the population feel that the police have become a law unto themselves - from trivia e.g stopping photographers, to less so - charges of assault or worse that never see the inside of a court. To regain our trust the police must show - in a believable and transparent fashion - that they work by the same laws that they enforce

 

Comments 5 of 306

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • Alana Saarinen at pianoMum, Dad and Mum

    The girl with three biological parents


  • Polish and British flags alongside British roadsideWar debt

    Does the UK still feel a sense of obligation towards Poles?


  • Islamic State fighters parade in Raqqa, Syria (30 June 2014)Who backs IS?

    Where Islamic State finds support to become a formidable force


  • Bride and groom-to-be photographed underwaterWetted bliss

    Chinese couples told to smile, but please hold your breath


  • A ship is dismantled for scrap in the port city of Chittagong, BangladeshDangerous work

    Bangladesh's ship breakers face economic challenge


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.