Wounded soldiers' 'jobs at risk'

Defence Secretary Philip Hammond at an Armistice Day ceremony with UK troops in Afghanistan The leak made the news on the day that millions of people honoured war dead for Armistice Day

Related Stories

Soldiers wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq could be made redundant as part of tens of thousands of armed forces job cuts, a leaked army memo suggests.

Wounded personnel were not part of 1,000 army redundancies earlier this year but could feature in coming cuts.

The memo seen by the Daily Telegraph suggests there could be 16,500 army cuts - up from 12,000 earlier reported.

The Army says no wounded personnel will be made to leave until their recovery means it "is the right decision".

The Telegraph reports that the memo suggests as many as 2,500 wounded soldiers could be made redundant in the next round of military cuts, as the military makes tens of thousands of job cuts by April 2015.

The document is thought to have been authored by a junior officer.

'Embarrassing timing'

The Telegraph reports that it has "been seen by soldiers serving on the front line in Afghanistan, who are outraged that they could be made redundant if they are wounded".

The BBC's defence correspondent Jonathan Beale described the timing of the leak as "deeply embarrassing" for the Ministry of Defence, "just as the nation remembers the sacrifices of those who have and are still fighting on the front line".

Following the leak, a Ministry of Defence statement said: "The Army is still considering the criteria including size and shape for Tranche 2 and any subsequent redundancy and nothing has yet been agreed."

Start Quote

After all the changes to defence in the past year this would be the cruellest cut of all”

End Quote Jim Murphy Shadow defence secretary

Some 7,000 troops will be laid off as part of the first tranche of redundancies, which has already begun.

Earlier reports had suggested that the second tranche would add 5,000 to that number, but the new memo seems to challenge that figure.

However housing minister Grant Shapps dismissed the document.

He told Sky News: "We have announced to the House of Commons what will happen. There is no change to that.

"I know it's always easy to pick up on some memo that somebody junior has written and come to conclusions.

"There is no chance of these people being kicked out. That is quite misleading."

Commodore Clive Walker, joint force support commander in Afghanistan, agreed.

"These sort of things can circulate from junior officers," he said.

"It's not endorsed I don't think by the army at this stage, because I think they are just scoping all of the options that are open."

But the shadow defence secretary Jim Murphy MP said that the government's "strategic shrinkage" of the Armed Forces was "being done by stealth".

He said: "No-one should be sacked because they are seriously injured while defending our country.

M Company, 42 Commando Royal Marines, carrying out Operation Volcano in Northern Helmand Province, Afghanistan The memo suggests as many as 2,500 soldiers wounded on the front line could be made redundant

"This weekend is about remembrance not argument.

"The government should be doing everything in its power to support people in to new roles in the forces, in the MoD or to a new career outside of defence.

"After all the changes to defence in the past year this would be the cruellest cut of all," he said.

Former Royal Navy officer Lewis Page said other cuts should be made before injured soldiers were targeted: "The Royal Navy has enormous numbers of senior officers bluntly sitting around not doing anything that possibly justifies their rank and pay.

"And that's the case top to bottom, side to side in the MoD.

"There are lots and lots of people, fully able-bodied people, often uniformed servicemen of quite senior ranks, who you could get rid of first before you would dream of telling an injured soldier he had to move on."

But the head of Army manning, Brig Richard Nugee said wounded soldiers would not be singled out for redundancy: "There is absolutely no plan to change our treatment of service personnel who are wounded, injured or sick.

"We have been clear throughout the redundancy and have made clear in the House of Commons that 'every case of wounded, injured or sick will be assessed individually.

"No-one will leave the armed forces through redundancy or otherwise until they have reached a point in their recovery where leaving the Armed Forces is the right decision, however long it takes'."

'Call of duty'

The revelations come as the government pledges to improve access to housing for ex-services personnel.

They should be prioritised on social housing waiting lists and government first-time buyer schemes, and there should be increased funding to adapt homes for wounded personnel and to stop so many ending up sleeping rough, said Grant Shapps.

"Our brave men and women in uniform aren't looking for sympathy and handouts, but all too often their selfless sacrifice for this country can become a major blockade on the road to a home of their own," he said.

Former British Army officer and Conservative MP Patrick Mercer said people needed to be realistic about how the Army budget was spent.

"The armed forces are not a charity.

"There comes a point when a soldier... say had been too badly injured particularly do their combat job, there aren't other jobs that can be found inside the armed forces, the time comes when they must go.

"But the provisions for them leaving the armed forces must be very, very carefully handled."


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 195.

    Not so silly as it sounds, providing that they are remunerated ( compensated ) sufficiently for them to live to the same standard as they had before their injury for the remainder of their working lives. Having a one armed soldier on the front line doesnt quite register well.

  • rate this

    Comment number 188.

    All those people who are saying "maybe this will stop people joining up & we will no longer have wars" need to wake up. No serviceman or woman joins thinking they will never get injured. It's drummed into them at basic training that they can be killed. If someone cannot do the job anymore they should leave and make way for others but the key is to make sure they are supported in civilian life.

  • rate this

    Comment number 102.

    As a former soldier with 12 years in the Army, i am not sure what the fuss is all about, these injured soldiers will not be made redundant but rather medically discharged. As has been the way for decades, this is not showing disrespect to these soldiers but is based on the understanding that they would be a burden on their comrades in theater. I am sure the armchair warriors will still complain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 86.

    I'm dumbfounded by the many comments here that all wounded soldiers should be kept. If you are unfit for duty it is right you are discharged. You will get a pension plus other benefits. I was discharged from the Navy after an injury and never expected to be retained as I was unfit for duty. Get real guys.

  • rate this

    Comment number 34.

    Soldiers who fight for their country and end up injured should not be made redundant. Surely there is some role for them to play, even if it is sitting behind a desk somewhere. They should also be given priority for housing and benefits.


Comments 5 of 6


More UK stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.