Politicians 'can do little on migration fears'

 
UK border control Study is the most common reason for immigration into the UK, but most people think it is for asylum

Related Stories

Immigration policy may be stuck between a "rock and a hard place" in dealing with public concerns, says an Oxford University report.

The study of 1,000 found people were most concerned about immigrant groups politicians could do little to cut.

The research by the university's Migration Observatory found broad overall support for cutting immigration to the UK, although less in Scotland.

The Home Office said its policies were in line with what the public wanted.

The Migration Observatory said it wanted answers to two questions that do not feature in standard opinion polls on immigration.

It asked respondents whom they referred to as immigrants and whether they wanted cuts to specific categories, such as asylum seekers, workers or students.

The report found approximately 70% of people want a cut in immigrants, broadly supporting previous surveys. A fifth said they thought immigration should stay at current levels.

Start Quote

They want the cuts to come from specific groups of immigrants, and these are often groups over whom the government has limited direct control”

End Quote Scott Blinder, report author

Six out of 10 people thought the most likely reason someone came to the UK was for asylum, followed by just over half saying migrants mainly arrived to work.

This contrasted sharply with official statistics that show students make up the largest group of immigrants, followed by workers. Approximately 4% of all migrants in 2009 were asylum seekers.

This difference between actual and perceived trends could be seen when people described who they wanted to see cut.

Students came last on the list, but 56% of people wanted fewer asylum seekers.

The group that people were most concerned about was low-skilled workers.

The UK has a standing ban on unskilled workers from outside the EU, introduced by the previous Labour government, but cannot restrict the movement of EU citizens.

'Blunt questions'

Scott Blinder, lead author of the report, said the team had tried to get behind blunt questions on immigration and establish whether public concerns mirrored government priorities.

% SUPPORTING A CUT, BY CATEGORY OF MIGRANT:

  • All types of students: 32%
  • High-skilled workers: 32%
  • Immediate family: 41%
  • Extended family: 58%
  • Asylum applicants: 56%
  • Low-skilled workers: 64%

He said that while the public wanted less immigration, a majority were concerned about the groups that it was most difficult for the government to reduce.

The coalition government has a target to cut net immigration to tens of thousands by the end of the Parliament.

It has introduced curbs on skilled workers from beyond Europe and students and it is also planning restrictions relating to family migration.

In response to the study, immigration minister Damian Green said: "We have made sweeping changes to get a grip on immigration in this country, closing down routes that were subject to abuse and taking action against those with no right to be here.

"This is clearly in line with what the public want us to be doing. There is much more to be done and we will stick to our course."

However, Dr Blinder said: "What this report shows very clearly is that the government is stuck between a rock and a hard-place.

"A clear majority of people in Britain would like immigration reduced, but they want the cuts to come from specific groups of immigrants, and these are often groups over whom the government has limited direct control, and sometimes groups that are comparatively small in number."

Ipsos Mori surveyed 1,002 people between 2 and 8 September for the Oxford study. Approximately 11% of those sampled were born abroad, 5% of them being British citizens.

Follow Dominic Casciani on Twitter.

Long-term net migration to the UK
 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 160.

    I think we're right to limit immigration in some sectors: eg unskilled workers from inside the EU. This is becoming a problem we can't easily fix, especially in some urban areas. (Cheers unelected European judges changing our laws without consent!) But some groups are beneficial ie intl. students, their astronomical fees alone ensure that and often they have to pay tax through working for support.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 126.

    Rather than moaning and whingeing about foreigners, we should encourage our youngsters to learn language to be able to deal with foreign business partners, we should build up a work force that can deal with the implications of globalisation, that understand the business language and culture of the new big spenders. We should forget about our false sense of entitlement, face reality and adjust,

  • rate this
    +34

    Comment number 53.

    The problem is the size of the population in the UK which is estimated to reach 70 million by 2026. This puts hugh pressure on housing, schools, hospitals, transport systems and natural resources including food and water. According to Government statistics, a new home for immigrants needs to be built every six minutes.We need the government to take tough measures to stabilize the population now.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 44.

    The UK is excellent at attracting foreign students and subsequently charging substantial fees for their education. It is one of the real success stories for the UK. (And it is a massive revenue earner.
    Over the years we tried to recruit the best students for our projects; however we were always ‘Lost out’ to the Americans and Canadians who would offer instant green cards (or equivalent).

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 29.

    Like it or not this country has always been a cultural melting pot which goes back to the times of the Angles and the Saxons and beyond.
    There are good and bad aspects to this but overall it is probably better overall that we are such a diverse mix of peoples.
    It is a fact of life that without migrant workers in the NHS it would have collapsed years ago.
    Be careful what you wish for.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.