Our children need time not stuff

 

Do British parents spend too much on material goods for their children?

Why are British children so unhappy? Four years after Unicef sparked national soul-searching with analysis showing child well-being in the UK at the bottom of a league of developed nations, the organisation has attempted to explain our problem.

The answer, it seems, is that we put too little store on family time and too much on material goods. Unicef paints a picture of a country that has got its priorities wrong - trading quality time with our children for "cupboards full of expensive toys that aren't used".

"Parents in the UK want to be good parents, but aren't sure how," the research suggests. "They feel they don't have the time, and sometimes the knowledge, and often try to compensate for this by buying their children gadgets and clothes."

The research compares Britain with Sweden and Spain. While the UK languishes in 21st, and last, place in the child well-being table, they come second and fifth respectively.

One reason they perform so much better, according to Unicef, is that in both countries "family time is protected" and children "all have greater access to activities".

"In Sweden their social policy allows family time and their culture massively reinforces it. In Spain fathers do work long hours, but the extended family is still very important and women stay at home to look after their children."

The report argues that the pressure of the working environment and rampant materialism combine to damage the well-being of our children. They want our attention but we give them our money.

"All children interviewed said that material goods did not make them happy, but materialism in the UK seems to be just as much of a problem for parents as children," the research concludes. "Parents in the UK often feel compelled to purchase consumer goods which are often neither wanted or treasured."

It is a profoundly depressing analysis of British life, not least because it rings true.

Time poor

The importance of parents devoting energy and love to the rearing of their children is accepted by political leaders from across the spectrum, but maximising income and encouraging consumption are regarded as vital components for economic growth.

In the UK, the demands of the latter often undermine the former.

Parents work all hours to increase family income but then are too exhausted or too busy to give their children the attention they need and deserve.

Of course the Swedes and the Spanish are materialistic too, but the researchers found parents in these countries more able to defy the consumer society.

"Parents in the UK… don't know how to challenge the materialist culture they see around them. This is in stark contrast to the families the researchers spent time with in Sweden and Spain."

Rank Material well-being*

Source: Unicef *Material well-being is calculated using three criteria: household incomes, access to basic educational resources, and housing living space.

1

Switzerland

2

Iceland

3

Netherlands

4

Denmark

5

France

6

Finland

7

Austria

8

Norway

9

Sweden

10

Germany

11

Czech Republic

12

Luxembourg

13

Ireland

14

Spain

15

Belgium

16

Portugal

17

Canada

18

Greece

19

United Kingdom

20

Italy

21

Poland

22

Hungary

23

US

24

Slovakia

One reason for Britain's poor performance, it is suggested, is that material inequality is much higher here than in other rich countries. The chart above - from another Unicef report card published last November - shows the UK with a far wider gap in material well-being than the OECD average.

The consequence is that poorer families feel they have to struggle even harder to get their children the stuff that is equated to status: the latest computer games, branded trainers and corporate logos.

"Parents and children feel massive external pressure from a materialistic culture, which they know won't bring happiness, but are conforming to none-the-less," the research finds. "Lack of family time and materialism is particularly felt among poorer families in the UK compared to the other countries."

Another problem is that British teenagers do not have enough to do - particularly within the educational arena.

"In the UK, children's time in active creative pursuits diminishes in secondary schools compared to children in Spain and Sweden. This is particularly true among older, deprived children in the UK."

Unicef's remedy is for Britain to look at its priorities. They want politicians to consider specific measures to support families:

  • reform of advertising laws
  • a living wage so that families earn enough to spend more time with each other
  • protection of children's facilities so they have the opportunity to be active

Before the last election, David Cameron gave a speech in which he said that "what matters most to a child's life chances is not the wealth of their upbringing but the warmth of their parenting."

Today's Unicef research would seem to concur. If Britain is serious about doing the best for its children, it needs to give them more time not more stuff.

 
Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

What is extreme?

Theresa May's proposal may be eye-catching, but it faces significant challenges.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 467.

    I think this is very true. The two children I babysit love to talk to me and we always have a great time when I'm round. But at the same time I don't have to keep the house in order so I have lots of time to pay attention to them. I think it's obvious what children want from their parents, but who has the time?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 466.

    I'm from Missouri, and it doesn't surprise me that the US is ranked second to last. It's considered perfectly acceptable here to force employees to work weekends and holidays, and it's rare to still find a family that eats together - with the result that most of my friends grew up unconnected to their parents. People here seem to love working for the sake of it, and time with family is neglected.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 465.

    The only thing that I disagree with in your article is that children need TIME, not stuff. What is TIME? Not even a physicist can tell you that for sure.
    Children need LOVE, unconditional LOVE that gently falls on them like the rays of the sun, even on the most cloudy day. When you LOVE your children, you feel what else they need to comfort their fears, dry their tears...celebrate their being.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 464.

    No wonder though that Switzerland comes out on top: they have a fully electrified railway that's owned by the state or the local Cantons and the people are sovereign in their own country.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 463.

    I can't believe this rubbish: everybody is banging on about unhappiness, lack of quality family time etc, but the analysis is based on "child well-being", clearly defined as "being calculated using three criteria: household incomes, access to basic educational resources, and housing living space." Nothing to do with happiness at all.

 

Comments 5 of 467

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.