Sir John Major dresses in tartan for devolution argument

 
John Major talks to Alex Salmond at Wimbledon Sir John calls for a system which some call 'devo max'

In a brief pause from the hacking furore I've just been reading a significant speech being delivered by the man who once declared that he was fighting the "Battle of Britain" and warned that there were just "72 hours to save the Union".

In a rare intervention into politics, former Prime Minister Sir John Major calls for the Scottish Parliament to be given powers to control everything except foreign affairs, defence and the economy.

Sir John warned against the dangers of devolution before the 1997 election. Today he calls for what some call "devo max".

If you are wondering why the former Tory leader's dressing in tartan, he explains that in return the English (and, of course, the Conservative Party) would see the end of the hated Barnett formula which gives Scotland more money to spend and a cut in the number of Scottish (usually Labour) MPs.

This may not seem like a live issue today, but it will be in the run-up to the next election. Scotland's re-elected First Minister Alex Salmond has always believed that the Tories were most likely to give him at least some of what he wanted.

This is how Sir John puts it:

"The present quasi-federalist settlement with Scotland is unsustainable. Each year of devolution has moved Scotland further from England. Scottish ambition is fraying English tolerance. This is a tie that will snap - unless the issue is resolved.

"The union between England and Scotland cannot be maintained by constant aggravation in Scotland and appeasement in London. I believe it is time to confront the argument head on.

'Shrinking military power'

"Why not devolve all responsibilities except foreign policy, defence and management of the economy? Why not let Scotland have wider tax-raising powers to pay for their policies and, in return, abolish the present block grant settlement, reduce Scottish representation in the Commons, and cut the legislative burden at Westminster?

"My own view on Scottish independence is very straightforward: it would be folly - bad for Scotland and bad for England - but, if Scots insist on it, England cannot - and should not - deny them."

Sir John's speech to the Ditchley Foundation also calls for appointed MPs - that's right, MPs not Lords - to bring expertise into Parliament, predicts that developments in Europe are likely to drive Britain further away from the EU and warns that the country's political classes are too obsessed by short-term politics and too complacent about the signs that the country is in long-term decline.

"In terms of GDP, the UK is the sixth most wealthy country in the world. But our national balance sheet carries many liabilities. Our physical infrastructure is old. Our health service is creaking. Whilst the best of our education - especially higher education - is world-class, some of it is unforgivably awful," he says.

"We are up to our ears in debt. The Exchequer is empty. The gold is gone. The post-dated cheques are accumulating interest. We are over-taxed. We have an under-class: poorly educated, poorly housed and unmotivated.

"We are no longer an Empire, nor will be ever again. We are a shrinking military power. By choice, and with majority public approval, we are semi-detached members of the EU. And even America - for so long our closest ally who generally sees the world as we do - is turning her face to the East, as self-interest determines she must."

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

UKIP - power struggle, not soap opera

All the bizarre news stories that have emerged from UKIP in recent days reflect a power struggle within a party that aspires to hold the balance of power after the next election.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 271.

    Canada and Australia are workable federations because their federal systems were instituted as they were being forged as nations.The island of Britain comprises three nations with wildly disparate poulation sizes,different economic and foreign policy needs and a long history of domination by the largest.Federation is unworkable.Devo max would only be for a while.Co-operative independence for all.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 270.

    Federation is a non-stater.You need federal capital territory for a start.England would dominate foreign and EU policy and that would be all too often to Scotland's detrimant.Our oil,fishing and renewables industries need direct Scottish representation at EU meetings.Scotland choosing Independence is the only solution.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 269.

    Well, in fairness, his comments are at least accurate.... the debate is certainly worth having.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 268.

    Hey Nick what happened to the discussion board on your your latest story about Mr Hunt? it was there a moment ago but not now!!
    come on let us COMMENT on it (discussion is not possible on 400chars in this format)..

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 267.

    Major promotes the kill or cure approach to the question of Scottish independence. He proposes giving the SNP enough rope with which to hang itself long before Scotland is in a position to handle independence financially (with or without oil revenues).
    I suspect he expects support to rapidly collapse when all the freebies which are unsustainable independently start disappearing.

 

Comments 5 of 271

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.