Archbishop of Canterbury criticises coalition policies

 
Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams says the Big Society idea is viewed with "widespread suspicion"

Related Stories

The Archbishop of Canterbury has warned that the government is committing Britain to "radical, long-term policies for which no-one voted".

Writing in the New Statesman magazine, Dr Rowan Williams raised concerns about the coalition's health, education and welfare reforms.

He said there was "indignation" due to a lack of "proper public argument".

A Downing Street spokesman said: "This government was elected to tackle Britain's deep-rooted problems."

"Its clear policies on health, welfare and the economy are necessary to ensure we are on the right track," he added.

The article was written for the latest edition of the New Statesman, which Dr Williams guest edited. The magazine is on sale from Thursday and the article is also available on its website.

'Plain fear'

In the piece, Dr Williams said the Big Society idea was viewed with "widespread suspicion".

Start Quote

Dr Williams even questioned the coalition's use of its democratic mandate”

End Quote Robert Pigott BBC religious affairs correspondent

Talking specifically about the government's key health and education policies, he said they were being introduced at a "remarkable speed".

"At the very least, there is an understandable anxiety about what democracy means in such a context," he said.

In a wide-ranging attack, he accused the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition of creating "anxiety and anger" in the country by introducing reforms without sufficient debate.

Dr Williams was critical of Prime Minister David Cameron's flagship Big Society initiative, which aims to shrink the state and hand more control of services to volunteer groups, describing it as a "stale" slogan, viewed as an "opportunistic" cover for spending cuts.

The archbishop's article also said there was concern that the government would abandon its responsibility for tackling child poverty, illiteracy and poor access to the best schools.

Business Secretary Vince Cable, "We welcome debate with him, it's not a problem"

"Government badly needs to hear just how much plain fear there is around questions such as these at present," he said.

'Relaxed'

He also criticised the government's welfare reforms, complaining of a "quiet resurgence of the seductive language of 'deserving' and 'undeserving' poor" and the steady pressure to increase "what look like punitive responses to alleged abuses of the system".

Business Secretary Vince Cable said the government had a clear mandate for its work.

Analysis

The tone and strength of language used in Dr Williams' attack on the coalition has taken ministers by surprise.

Accusing the government of being committed to "radical, long-term policies for which no-one voted" is an overtly political statement and one Downing Street has quickly rebuffed.

But they can't ignore the broad sweep of criticism or questioning of their mandate to govern.

The timing of this attack is curious as he has criticised coalition policies before.

It may have something to do with the fact he was guest editing left-wing magazine The New Statesman and wanted to write a thought-provoking piece.

I've heard he wanted to interview the prime minister but Mr Cameron must have declined. Dr Williams also has form when it comes to entering the political arena.

Ministers say they are happy to debate policies with him but clearly feel he has overstepped the mark with the scope of his article.

"The two parties of the coalition got substantially more than half of the total vote at the last election and the public knew that we were going to have to embark on very difficult changes connected with sorting out the massive budget deficit problems, so I don't think that criticism has much weight," he said.

Defence Secretary Dr Liam Fox had the government had legitimacy because it had a majority in the House of Commons.

"We should be relaxed about this. We shouldn't be hot under the collar because one churchman or another has expressed his views," he told Sky News.

A Downing Street spokesman said the prime minister had supported the idea of a Big Society long before the financial crisis and the need for significant savings.

Pressed over the significance of Dr Williams' comments, the Downing Street spokesman said: "He's obviously an important figure in British society."

Labour said the archbishop's comments reflected the concerns of people across the UK.

Shadow education secretary Andy Burnham said: "This government has no mandate for cutting too far and too fast, subjecting the NHS to a reckless top-down reorganisation and launching an unprecedented attack on young people by scrapping EMA and trebling tuition fees."

The former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said there was a long-standing tradition of archbishops criticising government.

"Obviously people used to criticise our policies not just on Iraq and foreign policy but on domestic policy and reform as well. It's just part of the way things work," he said.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -35

    Comment number 296.

    With all the respect to Dr Williams & his position , as a voter , this was PRECISELY one of the reasons among others , why I voted this government in like so many millions. Why doesn't he argue & articulte his POLITICAL thought provoking ideas in The House of Lords ? I stongly suggest that Dr. Williams stick to clerical matters & am sure the Almighty will reward him handsomely !

  • rate this
    +52

    Comment number 256.

    I'm bemused by commenters who appear to think Dr Williams should somehow be above politics. Political critique is and always has been at the heart of ministry in most churches. The status of the Church of England as the Established church of the UK is irrelevant. I would consider Dr Williams a pretty poor archbishop if he *didn't* voice his concerns about political issues affecting this country!

  • rate this
    +32

    Comment number 107.

    Dr Williams is not "one churchman or another", but head of the Church of England and of Anglicans world-wide, and also very much in touch with the leaders of other major churches. He is particularly well placed to comment on the 'Big Society', as it is predominantly churches and their members who run or assist with the charities that bridge the gaps between state provision and actual need.

  • rate this
    +33

    Comment number 94.

    Dr Williams has as much right to air his views as any other member of society, especially as the leader of a group which has several million practising members in the UK alone. He hasn't gone down the party political route with his criticism, but is expressing views which many in this country will sympathise with greatly.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 86.

    No mandate? The Conservatives got 36% of the vote and the Lib Dems 23% so combined that's 59% of the vote, more then any government for over 20 years. The Tory vote alone is higher than the 35% Labour got in 2005 when they still got 160 more seats then the Tories. I think they have a very clear mandate to govern, and it's just the archbishop doesn't like it, his Labour-leaning is well know.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Actor Demian Bichir and Brad Pitt (top left), poster for Miss Bala and a still from Pan's LabyrinthMexican wave

    Why the country's film-makers think they are poised for success

Programmes

  • Sunset over San MiguelFast Track Watch

    Why San Miguel has become Mexico's most popular inland tourism destination

bbc.co.uk navigation

BBC © 2012 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.