MoD cost reviews looks to find fresh cuts

British soldiers The Army is facing the loss of 7,000 posts by 2015 under the earlier plans

Related Stories

The Ministry of Defence is seeking to find more savings from the armed forces in the next financial year.

A three-month study, reporting in July, will consider which personnel and equipment programmes could be cut.

Last October's strategic defence and security review set out plans to scrap HMS Ark Royal and the Harrier fleet and cut 42,000 forces and civilian jobs.

The MoD said it was assessing whether spending assumptions made in the past were still affordable.

Last year's review outlined the future shape and size of Britain's armed forces with defence spending set to fall by 8% over four years.

The RAF and navy will lose 5,000 jobs each, the Army 7,000 and the MoD 25,000 civilian staff. Among the other cuts announced was the scrapping of the new Nimrod surveillance plane.

The MoD says the strategic defence and security review is not being reopened, but after completing the planning round for its budget for the financial year ending in March 2012, its work for next year has already started.

Strategic defence review

  • Harrier jump jet retired
  • Nimrod spy plane cancelled
  • 5,000 RAF personnel axed over five years
  • 5,000 Navy personnel cut
  • 7,000 army personnel cut
  • 25,000 civilian MoD staff axed
  • Trident replaced but £750m savings from fewer warheads
  • Two aircraft carriers saved, but one will not enter service

The MoD says the new study is part of work being done to ensure it matches its planning assumptions with its spending settlement, and closes the gap between the two.

A spokesman said: "We have made it clear that while the strategic defence and security review had made substantial inroads into the £38bn funding deficit, there is still more to be done."

BBC defence correspondent Caroline Wyatt said potential targets for spending cuts could include HMS Illustrious, the UK's last surviving aircraft carrier, which is due back from a refit next year, as well as plans for a new fleet of armoured vehicles.

Jim Murphy MP, Labour's shadow defence secretary, said the development amounted to a "startling admission from government that the defence review was not fit for purpose".

"Last year ministers claimed to have a long-term plan for defence, but just 28 weeks later there is an unseemly scramble to plug the serious financial holes in their plans," he said.

"At a time when the chief of defence staff has called on the government to 'up the ante' in Libya and the heads of the Army and the RAF have said their services are 'running hot', the country will be shocked that the MoD are preparing to make deeper defence cuts."

News of the MoD study comes as Defence Secretary Liam Fox prepares to address Parliament later on amendments to the Armed Forces Bill that will see principles of the military covenant - the nation's duty of care to personnel - written into law for the first time.

It is understood that measures to improve soldiers' welfare in areas such as health, housing and education for forces' children will also be revealed.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 82.

    Stop getting involved in un-winable wars that are none of your business. The complete waste of human life should be the question not how can we save more money. We know the cost of lives of our armed forces, what we don't know is how much money it is costing to waste their lives. Every time we get involved in another dirty little war I feel less and less secure both here and especially abroad.

  • rate this

    Comment number 72.

    We either become a country of Neutrality and set down our arms altogether or support and supply the armed forces fully in whatever conflicts we decide to stick them and our noses into.
    Choose which side of the fence, but don't make them sit on it duck like

  • rate this

    Comment number 34.

    About time the faceless civilians at the MOD who are the root cause of most things wrong in the military bear the brunt of any further cuts. In the NHS they are trying to put control back in the hands of health care professionals they should do the same with the MOD and then maybe the warfighter would get equipment fit for purpose.

  • rate this

    Comment number 16.

    As a forces wife, the various threats hanging over the CEA are truly terrifying. My children have no choice about how often they move schools - we move when Daddy moves. My 5 year old has already been to 3 different educational establishments and is due to move to his 4th. It's removal or mooted changes (that include the MOD bulk buying school places) would force many people out of the forces.

  • rate this

    Comment number 11.

    My Grandson has just joined the army, as it has been a life time thought of him. To now come into an unstable time when there are cut's, how will this effect him when he decides to leave, or god forbid, he goes to Afgan, and is injured, will this be cut back as well....worrying time for a Grandfather.......Politicians sit in their ivory boxes and don't listen to the public, prove me wrong???


Comments 5 of 7


More UK stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.