Coalition 'losing way' on green policies - campaigners

 
Industrial chimneys The letter urges the government to accept emission reduction recommendations

Related Stories

The heads of 15 green campaign groups have written to the prime minister warning the government is in danger of losing its way on environmental policy.

The letter says the coalition should promote a green economy with "urgency and resolve" if it is to follow its vow to be the "greenest government ever".

The groups include Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the RSPB.

Downing Street says it stands by its record of protecting the environment and delivering a low carbon economy.

A year ago, David Cameron said the environment would be a top priority.

In their letter the campaign groups describe the pledge as a "great ambition" and cite the cancellation of the third runway at Heathrow, the decision to set up a green investment bank and a commitment to a Natural Environment White Paper as examples of a "promising start".

They say the coalition "started with a strong sense of purpose on the environment but is now in danger of losing its way".

Start Quote

We urge you to set out the case that a green economy is central to the future prosperity of the UK”

End Quote Campaign groups

They point to the proposed changes in the planning system which they claim will not provide enough protection for wildlife and the countryside.

The letter also suggests a zero carbon homes policy has been weakened and point to delays in giving borrowing powers to the new green investment bank.

It says foreign policy should take account of natural resource security.

The letter adds: "Most critically we urge you to set out the case that a green economy is central to the future prosperity of the UK and not a cost to be endlessly debated and watered down...

"We believe there is still scope for your government to be the greenest ever, but it will require both urgency and resolve."

The letter is also signed by the heads of Green Alliance, Christian Aid, WWF, the Campaign to Protect Rural England, the Campaign for Better Transport, Oxfam, the Institute for European Environmental Policy, the Wildlife Trusts, Butterfly Conservation, Plantlife, the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and the Woodland Trust.

60% cuts

It goes on to urge the prime minister to accept the key recommendations of advisory body the Committee on Climate Change on cutting emissions "to create clarity for investors and citizens about the UK's direction".

The CCC's Fourth Carbon Budget report suggests signing up to a 50% cut in emissions on 1990 levels by 2025 and 60% cuts by 2030.

Andy Atkins, executive director of Friends of the Earth, told the BBC's Today programme that if the government failed to accept the committee's key recommendations, it would make it "very difficult" for it "to achieve many of the other things that it says it wants to do".

He added: "We think that out of integrity they've really got to do it if they want to be seen as the greenest government ever."

Mr Atkins said he was concerned that the government was moving away from accepting the committee's recommendations because of economic considerations, which he called "stone age economics".

"Let's be clear, the climate change committee has not just made these recommendations on the basis of the science, they have looked at the economics as well," he added.

Cabinet split

The campaigners' plea comes after reports of a split in the cabinet over whether to accept the recommendations amid concerns that meeting the goal could impact on economic growth.

Labour has seized on the apparent disagreement, saying it left Mr Cameron's environmental commitment "in shreds".

Last week, a review funded by Friends of the Earth suggested there had been little or no progress in 55 government policies on the environment.

In response a government spokesman highlighted initiatives such as the "green deal" to cut home emissions, its work on global deals to protect wildlife and forests and reforms of the electricity market to promote low carbon generation.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 69.

    No Government can ever do enough in this area; the problem really is that serious. Government must set a lead in its own behaviour, and show t it has a coherent and balanced policy. Bits here and there aren't good enough, and that's all we seem to have at present. We need a clear set of laws, incentives for individuals and industry to follow them, and severe penalties for both if they don't

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 63.

    I think it is everyone responsible to do their bit for our environment, separate the waste accordingly. Suggest household to keep old newspapers, cans, bottles and sell it to the recycling company. In Austria, household recycling is compulsory. Come on people, lets put aside the politics. This is OUR environment, YOU & ME ought to have the responsible to keep our environment alive.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 56.

    When your plan with the revival of the UK economy rests with the private business sector, then any aspirations you have for the environment will soon vanish. Private business is motivated by money. Money has few morals. It takes strong moral principles to put the environment first. It will take strong legislation to complel farmers and business to do the right thing. They are motivated by money.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 53.

    I am astonished that the government has allowed the green economy to become a victim of the deficit and their small state dogma. If I ever saw a massive opportunity to invest tax-payer money for the future this is one.
    We have the opportunity to become a world leader in developing and manufacturing green goods, systems and equipment. The government has squandered it.

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 52.

    Again the greens want us to fund the cost of their ideas.
    We are a small country and if we did all that they suggested it would make little difference to the supposed global warming.
    They need to turn their attention to the countries that are churning out huge amounts of waste and do not give a thought to the peoples of their own countries let alone anyboby else.

 
 

More UK stories

RSS

Features

  • NS Savannah, 1962Nuclear dream

    The ship that totally failed to change the world


  • Espresso cup7 days quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Glasgow 2014 quaichs and medalsQuaich guide

    What do the Scottish gifts given to Games medallists symbolise?


  • Malaysian plane wreckage in UkraineFlight risk

    How odd is it for three planes to crash in eight days?


  • israel flagDos and don'ts

    Can you criticise Israel without being anti-Semitic?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.