Cameron rejects claim of 'university places for rich'

 

On extra places for rich students, Mr Cameron said: "That is not going to happen. That is not our policy."

Prime Minister David Cameron has rejected suggestions the government is considering allowing wealthy students to pay for extra university places.

"There is no question of people being able to buy their way into university," Mr Cameron told the BBC.

Universities Minister David Willetts said extra places could be funded by businesses or charities and not wealthy individuals.

But Labour's John Denham accused the government of a "humiliating u-turn".

Mr Willetts had to face questions in the House of Commons over proposals to create extra university places in England which would not depend upon public funding.

'Rich individuals'

In angry exchanges, the minister told MPs that he was considering plans to make it easier for employers and charities to fund additional places - but "rich individuals should not be able to buy their way into universities".

Shadow Business Secretary John Denham attacked the government for a "humiliating climbdown" - and said there were many questions unanswered how any extra places would be allocated.

"I think it is clear that the government still intends to create a two tier system - one method of entry for the most able, another for those with access to private funds from one source or another," said Mr Denham.

There were also questions from MPs about what types of organisations could sponsor their own extra places - would it include independent schools with charitable status or trusts set up for their children by wealthy families.

ANALYSIS

David Willetts is widely know at Westminster as "two brains".

Unfortunately many of his colleagues believe he showed "no brains" - or at least a distinct lack of media savvy - when interviewed about increasing university places.

Where a more down to earth politician would simply have killed off the notion that better off parents could buy their children places at our more prestigious univerisites - Mr Willetts allowed the idea to gain legs.

The results - a screeching, crunching denial some four hours later, just as the idea was threatening to turn into a major political storm, further fuelling tensions within the coaltion.

It underlines just how sensitive relations within the coalition have become in the wake of last week's crunching defeats for the Lib Dems in the local elections.

Mr Cameron had earlier moved to quash the idea that there should be a different system of places for wealthy students - saying that Mr Willetts had not intended that.

"That is not going to happen. That is not our policy... The government's policy is absolutely clear that university access is about the ability to learn and not the ability to pay," said Mr Cameron.

At present, universities can create extra places and set their own fees for overseas students - and there were suggestions that a forthcoming White Paper would allow such flexibility to be extended to wealthy UK students.

This would mean that universities would be able to create more places for self-funded students, outside of the quota of publicly-funded places.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Willetts had said: "People are coming to us with innovative ideas about how you could liberalise the system - so that it would be possible for extra people to get to university."

Any such proposals would have to comply with the government's support for social mobility, he said.

But with such strong political sensitivity around tuition fees and social mobility, the government was forced to clarify that such changes would not mean any priority university entrance for the privileged.

"There is no question of wealthy students being able to buy a place at university. Access to a university must be based on ability to learn not ability to pay," said a statement from Mr Willetts.

There had already been an angry reaction from students and lecturers at the prospect of extra places being created for students rich enough to fund themselves through a degree course.

Aaron Porter, president of the National Union of Students, said such a scheme would "create a two-tier system that allows the richest, less able applicants a second bite at the university cherry and denies low and middle-income students the same opportunity".

"It simply cannot be the case that daddy's money can buy you a place at this university. Off-quota places are a badly disguised attempt to completely remove the cap on fees," said Rahul Mansigani, president of Cambridge University students' union.

'Turning back the clock'

"Far from increasing social mobility, it is hard to see how this is anything other than the government entrenching privilege for the wealthy in response to its failing university fees policy," said the UCU lecturers' union leader, Sally Hunt.

"We risk turning the clock back to a time when breeding rather than brains were required to get on in life."

Universities Minister David Willetts: "It would be important to do it in a way that improved social mobility."

"This manifestly unfair and elitist policy smacks of total desperation from a government whose universities policy is in freefall," said David Barclay, president of Oxford University Student Union.

Sir Peter Lampl, chairman of the Sutton Trust education charity, said: "This proposal is likely to deal a serious blow to social mobility, allowing the better-off to buy advantage in the university system, just as they do in the school system."

But there was also support for the idea of allowing universities greater freedom over creating extra places.

Andy Westwood, chief executive of the Guild HE group of universities, said that it could give universities more flexibility over the number of places they could offer for poorer students.

"Providing off-quota places can be socially progressive," said Mr Westwood.

"With the right incentives, this could lead to more innovative and flexible choices such as part-time, intensive and modular courses, with 'pay as you go' options," he said.

The proposals are being considered as part of a government White Paper on higher education set to be published next month.

At present, the government sets a quota for publicly-funded university places each year - and the idea of "off quota" places is that universities could create additional places for those students who did not have to borrow loans to pay tuition fees.

There are already companies such as KPMG which have plans to sponsor students through university - creating such "off quota" places.

 

More on This Story

From other news sites

* May require registration or subscription

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 480.

    When I went to university - under John Major's government - fees were paid for by the state and there were still the vestiges of grants.

    Unser Labour, grants went and huge student debt ensured. The reason? Too many going to university, more than the state could possibly afford, and far more than industry needs.

    Fewer university places would mean that pupils might start working for them!

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 404.

    I'm in year 12 right now, and to be honest I am not looking forward to university, financially anyway. The tuition fees can be paid of later, but in terms of accommodation and general living costs, there are tough times ahead for students, and with universities tightening their entries and repayments increasing, for many of my classmates, further education is out of the question.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 311.

    As a current student these additional places don't seem horrendous. As long as the students who are paying for their place are at the same academic level. Perhaps the cost of gaining an off-quota place should be put at triple the new level for everyone else.

  • rate this
    -44

    Comment number 188.

    Get over it! Good education costs, and if publically funded means there will always be a limit on places. Additional privately funded places are a bonus for everyone (richer university = more scholarships for the poor, Harvard is a good example). People in the UK pay very little for higher education - I had to pay off my (american) wife's $120k student loan for five years of study, mine was £4k!

  • rate this
    +22

    Comment number 185.

    This makes me sick to my stomach...as a current university student who isn't supported by her parents while studying, I am totally outraged ay the governments new idea.

    All students should have the right to go to university whether rich or poor, money should not come into it! Basically those from a richer background will now be able to buy themselves a place at a better university, what a joke!

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.