Pickles backs plan to merge Tory councils

Eric Pickles Mr Pickles said the merger plan could help protect hard-working families and the most vulnerable

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has said three Conservative councils who have agreed in principle to merge all their services are "leading the way".

He said others should follow London's Hammersmith and Fulham, Kensington and Chelsea, and Westminster.

The three councils admitted there would be "significant" staff reductions but said they could save up to £100m.

Unison, which represents 7,000 staff members, warned standards would fall as decision making became more removed.

Mr Pickles said: "These councils are leading the way in local government and voters will expect others to get on board and follow suit.

"This is exactly the sort of innovation that will help councils to protect hard-working families and the most vulnerable.

"By sharing back-office services, they'll be able to protect the front line - and even improve the choice and services that's on offer to local residents."

Under the proposal, each authority would retain its political identity with its own elected leaders and councillors.

'Absolute guarantee'

Efforts are already under way to merge the three children's services departments, which cover education, but now the authorities are considering whether to go further.

The plans will be formally announced later and if they are adopted could create a local authority bigger than Glasgow or Leeds.

Start Quote

Super-sizing the delivery of services like this means local councillors become insignificant”

End Quote Peter Allenson Unite

A series of working groups will be set up to look at ways of merging three main areas - environmental services, family services and corporate services.

The groups are due to report back by February next year and more detailed plans will then be put out to public consultation.

Hammersmith and Fulham leader Stephen Greenhalgh admitted there would be "significant reductions" in staff and the spending cuts meant jobs could not be safeguarded.

But he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he gave an "absolute guarantee" that merging and sharing services would not compromise the political sovereignty of the three councils.

"There's a lot of bureaucracy involved with delivering local services. You often find that of the £3 we spend, £1 is spent deciding what to do with the other two," he said.

'Homogeneous blob'

"This is about minimising that overhead, and we still have political sovereignty, still have the ability to choose how we spend the money locally."

Wheelie bins full of rubbish Services including refuse collection could be combined to cut costs

He added the councils were not trying to create a "homogeneous blob" but were just being more efficient about the choice of services received.

In a joint statement, the councils' leaders said the initiative would soon become the norm for local authorities looking to keep costs down while delivering quality services.

Colin Barrow (Westminster), Stephen Greenhalgh (Hammersmith and Fulham) and Sir Merrick Cockell (Kensington and Chelsea) said that potentially sharing every service was a way to "reduce duplication and drive out needless cost".

But Unison's regional secretary for Greater London, Linda Perks, said: "Any mergers are bound to lead to significant job losses.

The three councils
Council Pop. Budget* Staff

Hammersmith & Fulham

169,700

£764m

4,067

Kensington & Chelsea

169,900

£415m

2,522

Westminster

249,400

£818m

2,500

*Annual gross budget 2010/11

"This will add more London public sector employees to the dole queues and damage the capital's already fragile economy."

And the Unite union warned councils against rushing into "untested structures" despite the pressure from cuts.

Its national officer for local government, Peter Allenson, said: "Councils have to be close to the needs of their communities and the people who elect them and pay for them - and council workers need to know who is in charge.

"Super-sizing the delivery of services like this means local councillors become insignificant and have little influence on the services they provide.

"Voters will soon become disenfranchised and wonder what they are paying for."

There are other examples of pooled resources - South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse district councils share a chief executive for example - but not on this scale.

The Local Government Association said this was the first proposal with initial agreement to potentially share all services, not just back-office ones.

More on This Story

The Spending Review: Making It Clear

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More UK stories

RSS

Features

  • Two women in  JohanesburgYour pictures

    Readers' photos on the theme of South Africa


  • Worcestershire flagFlying the flag

    Preserving the identities of England's counties


  • Female model's bottom in leopard skin trousers as she walks up the catwalkBum deal

    Why budget buttock ops can be bad for your health


  • The OfficeIn pictures

    Fifty landmark shows from 50 years of BBC Two


  • French luxury Tea House, Mariage Freres display of tea pots Tea for tu

    France falls back in love with tea - but don't expect a British cuppa


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.