One million UK properties on 'superfast broadband' after investment

Broadband The UK's broadband speeds are faster than in some European neighbours but lag behind those of other nations

Related Stories

The UK's culture secretary has said that more than a million properties now have access to "superfast broadband speeds" as a result of a government-backed rollout of the tech.

Sajid Javid added that the effort was "firmly on track" to offer high-speed internet to 95% of UK homes and businesses by 2017.

He said that fast speeds were "totally transforming the way we live and work".

But many have questioned the quality of access and speeds advertised.

'Not good enough'

Superfast broadband is defined by the European Union as speeds of 24Mbps or above. The UK government's ambition is to provide 95% of the UK with those speeds or higher by 2017, with the rest having a minimum speed of 2Mbps.

Start Quote

There are far too many homes and businesses in both rural and urban areas that won't see any benefit for some years to come”

End Quote Independent Network Co-operative Association

By contrast, Finland plans to have a baseline speed that is more than four times faster - 100Mbps - by next year, while South Korea wants to see citizens equipped with 1Gbps connections by 2017.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has said that the UK's broadband target is simply not ambitious enough when compared with other nations and wants the government to commit to delivering a minimum of 10Mbps for all homes and businesses by 2018-19.

John Allan, FSB's national chairman, told the BBC that "there is still a long way to go".

"Small businesses are increasingly reliant on digital services, but too many are without decent and affordable broadband that meets their needs. This restricts their ability to grow, innovate and compete in global markets.

"Leaving 5% of the UK without adequate broadband in 2017 is simply not good enough. "

But the UK government says the current UK coverage of superfast broadband is the highest of the five biggest European economies.

Rural access

The government has also set aside millions to improve broadband access in rural areas.

BT engineer at a street cabinet BT has a monopoly on rural broadband rollout

But BDUK, the group set up to spend the £530m of government money for the rural internet initiative, has come in for criticism for delays in distributing funds to councils and for awarding every contract to BT.

"Getting fibre to rural areas is hard, and often complex, work, but we are making great progress," said Gavin Patterson, the chief executive of BT, adding that it was laying undersea cables to the Outer Hebrides, for example.

"Some of the early projects are close to completion, and further funds will be released if we come in under-budget or take-up exceeds expectations," he said.

A Commons Public Accounts Committee report criticised the government for wasting taxpayers' money by giving all of its broadband funds to BT.

The FSB has said that coverage in rural areas is "either very poor or non-existent".

Alternative providers are already in place. B4RN (Broadband for the Rural North), for example, offers broadband speeds of up to 1Gbps to about 350 homes currently. But since BT signed contracts with councils around the UK, the plug has been pulled on several community-based schemes.

Malcolm Corbett, head of the Independent Network Co-operative Association, which represents some of the smaller broadband suppliers, told the BBC: "It is great that the rollout programme is making good progress. However, there are far too many homes and businesses in both rural and urban areas that won't see any benefit for some years to come.

"Fortunately there is a growing sector of independent providers that are stepping up to fill the void," he added, citing projects like CityFibre, which is developing a portfolio to bring ultra-high-speed broadband to York, Peterborough, Coventry, Bournemouth, and more.

Andrew Ferguson, the editor of, told the BBC that the focus was now on those 5% of people in the "most remote and hardest parts" of the UK not covered by the current plans for superfast broadband.

He said that £10m had been invested in a series of pilot projects currently under way in eight locations across the nation to work out how best to get broadband to them.

"The findings will be used to inform future funding bids to ensure everyone benefits from the transformation of the digital landscape currently under way," he added.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 175.

    Britain has a genuine, realistic chance to lead the world here. Fibre to the home is the solution which could be comfortably achieved for a fraction of what we're about to spend on shaving 30 minutes off a train journey.

    We're a small densely-populated island, yes there are challenges, but this can be done.

    All it needs is a politician to understand how important this is to the country.

  • rate this

    Comment number 124.

    I live and attempt to run a business within half a mile of silicon roundabout (old st in London) but cannot get superfast broadband. I along with a number of other small businesses are on Exchange Only lines. We are not offered anything above standard. I am advised by the Minister, Open Reach and my London Assembly member that there is nothing planned or anything anyone is prepared to do. LOL!

  • rate this

    Comment number 77.

    I work for telecoms countries worldwide. The uk has 99.6% population coverage but that is much less when it comes to geography. South Korea, Singapore etc have good high speed because people live in apartment blocks so it is much cheaper to cable up, but have poor international links so many websites are still slow. Uk broadband prices are ok, but line rental and basic cable tv very high

  • rate this

    Comment number 52.

    Nothing is free - providing better broadband to cities is far cheaper than in remote locations that is why you can't get Virgin broadband outside cities.

    Either the full cost is covered by those choosing to live remotely or you ask everyone else to share the cost via taxes. Not many people seem willing to pay more to cover these extra costs.

  • rate this

    Comment number 41.

    i am on super fast and could not live without it now , but its a bit costly speed needs to go up all over the country but prices need to come down so all can afford it not just the privalidged


Comments 5 of 8


More Technology stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.