Teen sexter convicted for child porn

Someone texting A teenager has been convicted of distributing child pornography after "sexting" images of another teenager

Related Stories

A teenager in Canada has been found guilty of possessing and disseminating child pornography after sending text messages containing naked images of her boyfriend's ex-girlfriend.

The teenager - who was aged 16 at the time of the offence - had been shown the photos by her boyfriend, then sent them to a friend.

The court heard her aim had been to humiliate and intimidate her victim.

The lawyer representing the teenager says she will challenge the verdict.

The victim was of a similar age to the accused, which meant the images were deemed to be child pornography. The teenager was also charged with "uttering threats".


The judge in the case in Victoria, British Columbia, told CTV News that the messages were "mean, rude and antagonistic".

"The images in question come within the definition of child pornography."

British Columbia Coat of Arms The case, which is the first of its kind, was heard in a court in Victoria, British Columbia in Canada

The trial focused on three images and a handful of text messages that were shared between the accused, her friend, the boyfriend and the victim.

"Always be careful of what you allow of pictures to be taken, what you send to whom," crown prosecutor Chandra Fisher said.

"[Teenagers] need to be careful what they send, what they send to each other and where it might end up."

Ms Fisher said that the case was an unusual one and could be precedent-setting.

Christopher Mackie, the lawyer representing the teenager, said he would challenge the verdict on constitutional grounds.

He told the court that it was unconstitutional to charge youths who "sext" with child-pornography offences because it was legal for adults to text "erotic images".

"These child pornography laws were intended to protect children, not to persecute them", he told news organisation CBC. He said it was a "heavy hammer" to be using.

The case will be back in court on 28 January to set a date for the hearing of constitutional arguments.

More on This Story

Related Stories

More Technology stories



  • Firth of Forth bridgeWhat came Firth?

    How the Forth was crossed before the famous bridge

  • Petrol pumpPumping up

    Why are petrol prices rising again?

  • Image of George from Tube CrushTube crush

    How London's male commuters set Chinese hearts racing

  • Elderly manSuicide decline

    The number of old people killing themselves has fallen. Why?

  • TricycleTreasure trove

    The lost property shop stuffed with diamonds, bikes... and a leg

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.