4G - peace in our time?

Man and woman walk past mural using smartphones

It's a crucial meeting at which Britain's hi-tech future could be decided. Later on Tuesday, the new Culture Secretary Maria Miller presides over peace talks between the chief executives of the major mobile phone operators and Ofcom's boss Ed Richards.

The issue at stake - can the 4G auction be accelerated enough to convince O2 and Vodafone not to go to war with Ofcom over what they see as favouritism towards their rival Everything Everywhere?

Having seen a letter written by Mr Richards to the culture secretary outlining the shape of a deal, I'd be surprised if peace does not break out.

But first a quick reminder of how we got here. Back in August, Ofcom announced that it would allow Everything Everywhere - now EE - to use its existing 1,800Mhz spectrum to start its 4G service early. Its rivals, without enough of that spectrum to adopt a similar strategy, threatened legal action to challenge Ofcom's ruling and prevent EE from launching 4G.

Then, in one of his last acts as Culture Secretary, Jeremy Hunt negotiated a four-week ceasefire - EE would agree to hold off announcing a 4G launch date, its rivals would keep their lawyers on the leash. Now that ceasefire is over and Tuesday's meeting should decide what happens next.

What O2 and Vodafone wanted was reassurance that EE's window of exclusivity would be shortened by having the whole 4G auction accelerated. Ofcom's letter - which has been copied to all the operators - asserts that considerable progress has been made.

Start Quote

A new body has been created to ensure that 4G signals do not interfere with digital television”

End Quote

The January date of the auction itself can only be brought forward by a couple of weeks, but much more has been done, says Ofcom, about the process of clearing the spectrum for use by its new owners. With analogue television and air traffic control currently using some of the airwaves, it was expected to take until the end of 2013 for this job to be completed. Now, says Ofcom, the hope is that it can be completed in the late spring, so that new 4G services could start rolling out to many parts of the UK in May or June 2013.

The other issue for O2 and Vodafone has been that EE might try to delay the process. A new body Mitco, financed by all the operators, has been created to ensure that 4G signals do not interfere with digital television. The fear was that it would be in EE's interest to make sure this work did not proceed too rapidly. But on this point too, Ofcom has been eager to reassure the government that Mitco will do its job as rapidly as possible.

All in all, Ofcom believes that EE's period of being the only 4G game in town will shrink from as much as 18 months to as little as six months. O2 in particular will want to see the fine print before telling its masters at Telefonica that this deal is acceptable. But it seems likely that they will sign up rather than risk being seen as the company which delayed the arrival of a vital technology for the UK.

And if it does all work out, Ofcom will be entitled to feel just a little smug. By taking a risk with its EE ruling, it will have forced the whole mobile industry to focus on a faster transition to 4G.

Rory Cellan-Jones Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

Kickstarter - now just a store?

How Pebble's new smartwatch is taking Kickstarter by storm

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 24.

    Just watched BBC about 4G. testing 1 person on 4G was 10 times faster than the 3G service with millions on it ???
    anyone else noticed something wrong here??
    hope they keep running 3G will end up faster using that

  • rate this

    Comment number 23.

    20 Dan

    As I understand it, 4G in the 800MHz band should provide greater coverage per mast than 3G, so it's more cost-effective than adding new masts in the face of local opposition, to support a standard that is about to be superseded.

    More cynically, mobile providers are purely out to make money, so they won't put a mast where it won't cover its costs, unless obliged to do so by the state.

  • rate this

    Comment number 22.

    4G! Great but not a concern for me here in Cambridgeshire. Signal of O2, Vodafone and EE are sporadic, at best. Message to Ofcom. Please sort out a 'National Grid' of ALL carriers to provide an acceptable service to those of us who are outside the major conurbations. If O2 and Voda have the technical ability to do this and you've given the OK for this why not add EE and 3 for the benefit of all?

  • rate this

    Comment number 21.

    Recently came back from holiday in the Greek islands, I was initially worried about data costs on my phone, but once their found out that no matter where you stand (town, bar, beech, hotel, airport, mountain) you have access to minimum 5 entirely FREE wifi access points!!! No passwords, no logon pages, everyone happily shares their WiFi!!!

    Why do we need 4G? Oh yes that's right PROFIT!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 20.

    I completely agree with the comments here about poor existing coverage. Even in the town centres in my part of the world (East Dorset), I'm lucky if I can get a basic 2G data signal, let alone Edge or 3G.

    Why don't the network providers focus on providing a decent level of 3G coverage outside a handful of major cities, before they start falling over themselves to roll out 4G?


Comments 5 of 24



  • Kim Jong-ilKorean kidnap

    The film stars abducted by North Korea and forced to make movies

  • TabletFeeling flat

    Are tablets losing their appeal?

  • scarlett Johansson7 days quiz

    Did someone try to impersonate Scarlett on the red carpet?

  • Woman reading on subwayCover shots Watch

    The disappearing books of the New York city subway

  • llamasLlama drama

    Two unlikely fugitives go on the run in Arizona

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.