UK cities divide up fast broadband cash
Londoners should benefit from promised "super-fast" download speeds
The government has announced how it will share the money promised to 10 UK cities to allow them to create superfast broadband networks.
London gets the largest share of the £114m pot with £25m, followed by Leeds and Bradford, which will divide £14.4m.
The money will be used to build city-wide networks, offering homes and businesses speeds of up to 100Mbps (megabits per second).
The government wants to make the UK the fastest place in Europe by 2015.
A further £50m is to be awarded to ten smaller cities.
HOW THE CASH IS SPLIT
- London - £25m
- Leeds and Bradford - £14.4m
- Belfast - £13.7m
- Manchester - £12m
- Bristol - £11.3m
- Cardiff - £11m
- Edinburgh - £10.7m
- Birmingham - £10m
- Newcastle - £6m
New culture secretary Maria Miller promised last week to cut the red tape associated with broadband rollouts.
She hopes that the city networks can be built soon.
"These 10 cities have produced ambitious and comprehensive plans, which will turn them into digital leaders, and give their local economies a real boost," she said.
The new investment will help put these cities at the centre of the digital stage, competing for jobs and investment with the best in the world," she added.
However, the Labour Party accused the minister of spin.
"This government is disguising its failure to roll out universal broadband by making yet another re-announcement about the superconnected cities programme," said the Shadow Minister for Media and Telecoms, Helen Goodman.
"It is also unlikely that the government will meet its target of rolling out super-fast broadband to 90% of premises by 2015."
Alongside the government money, each city is expected to invest some of its own funds in the broadband projects.
The 10 cities' plans are expected to bring superfast broadband access (offering speeds between 80 and 100 megabits per second) to around an extra 230,000 residential and 55,000 business premises as well as high speed wireless to even more.
All the networks are due to be completed by 2015.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~20~RS~)


Microsoft U-turn in Xbox games row
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Disaster on ice
Renegade reporter
Bad tip?
Ye gods
Talking Movies
Comment number 169.
Val20th September 2012 - 16:18
About time! My broadband provider says I should get 5 mbps, but typically my speed is more like 5-10 kpbs! I know this may not be completely their fault, but surely living only 10 miles out of central London I can expect better connectivity than this?!
Link to this (Comment number 169)
Comment number 153.
mc180520th September 2012 - 14:55
I run a business in an urban area and businesses that rely on fast connectivity can already access super fast broadband by choosing a leased line or cable connectivity. The investment would be much better in bringing better broadband speeds to rural and suburban areas.
Link to this (Comment number 153)
Comment number 125.
TimmyNorfolk20th September 2012 - 13:32
why are people surprised that the biggest city gets the most money. that makes sense! as for working from home - i work from home on < 1Mbps - just remote connect to a PC in a central office with better network
Link to this (Comment number 125)
Comment number 80.
Chris20th September 2012 - 12:12
Once again out of touch politicians have thrown public money in the wrong direction. Cities are already benefitting from extensive infrastructure upgrades and financial input from the private sector companies competing for high speed broad-band customers. There is, as usual, no interest in businesses in rural areas that are trying to run their affairs limping along on 3meg (if they're lucky)
Link to this (Comment number 80)
Comment number 71.
scunnered20th September 2012 - 11:58
The government wants to make the UK the fastest place in Europe by 2015
Not true. Rural areas will not be included. London-centric allocation of resources - again.
This increases pressure on the transport system and forces people to waste time travelling. With fast broadband at home many people, esp. mothers, would choose to work from home thus increasing the nation's productive workforce
Fail!
Link to this (Comment number 71)
Comments 5 of 7