iPhone 5 - Ofcom’s 4G gamble

iPhone 5

Such has been the build-up, that I suspect you've already heard quite enough about the iPhone 5. So, apart from saying that it looks to me like a respectable upgrade that does enough to satisfy the Apple community, without winning over the larger Android fanbase, let's leave it there. What is more interesting is where it leaves the row over 4G in Britain.

From the moment Apple's Phil Schiller put up a map of the UK with the new EE logo on it, the cat was among the pigeons. He was describing which companies around the world would be able to offer the new iPhone's fast 4G networking, and in Britain that is the owner of Orange and T-Mobile.

Vodafone, O2 and Three will of course be able to sell the new phone - but only EE will be able to market it as a 4G device. What's more, the company's new network should be relatively uncongested in the early days, so that customers will experience an even sharper contrast with the service offered to 3G users.

When Ofcom gave the go-ahead for EE to use its 1800Mhz spectrum to launch 4G early, Vodafone and O2 were furious. They have been mulling a legal challenge to stop it happening, but a temporary ceasefire has been brokered by the government.

That is why we have, as yet, no precise starting date for EE's 4G - although we're told it's coming "in weeks". Meanwhile, Vodafone and O2 are pressing Ofcom to act to shorten the period when one firm will have exclusivity.

They want both the 4G auction and then the freeing up of the 800Mhz and 2600Mhz spectrum to be accelerated. But as far as I can see, there is little wiggle-room. The auction process is due to be completed early in 2013 and then the technical work to make sure the airwaves are clear for use - and there's no interference with radar or digital television - could take the rest of the year.

Rory tests the new 4G-enabled iPhone 5

In summary, it is hard to see EE's 4G monopoly lasting less than a year. "That's unfair!" cry O2 and Vodafone, who stress that their only wish is to see the whole of Britain get 4G as soon as possible. Cynics might argue that they only discovered this urgent need for a 4G nation once their rival had stolen a march on them.

But isn't it unfair to give one company a commercial advantage? Ofcom says it has to balance that concern with the benefit to consumers of getting speedy access to 4G. In its document outlining its reasons for giving the go-ahead to EE, the regulator cites a previous example of one company enjoying a temporary monopoly.

When the first iPhone came out in 2007, O2 had an exclusive deal to sell it for almost two years. Millions of new subscribers came to the network, but once the period of exclusivity was over, the playing field was levelled again, and O2 did not appear to gain a long-term advantage.

The regulator appears to believe that any commercial gain made by EE over the next year will only be temporary - and in any case, the benefit to consumers of kick-starting 4G makes it worth the risk.

So, prepare for a big experiment. Do consumers really want a superfast iPhone 5 enough to switch networks - and will that give EE an unfair advantage? Regulators, operators and some very expensive commercial lawyers will be watching very closely to see what happens next.

Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology correspondent Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

More on This Story

More from Rory


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 70.

    69. richieb - If "The tech reporting is woeful, and so biased as to be almost unreadable", why are you on this website reading it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 69.

    What exactly are Rory's qualifications for being a tech journalist. Ot anyone at the BBC for that matter? Yes we all know everyone at the BBC got shiney new iPhones or ipads and seem to be paid for getting as many references to an apple product in a story as they. The tech reporting is woeful, and so biased as to be almost unreadable. You're supposed to be unbiased, that's what we pay for.

  • rate this

    Comment number 68.

    >28. Wee_Fred
    >Great, now we've got a story about 02 bringing out a 4G network and
    >the article is all about the iPhone. Why? The new iPhone was very late
    >to the 4G party and yet it's somehow the main topic on every article
    >about 4G on bbc tech news. Why?

    The Beeb gave up any pretence at technology news ages ago and substituted Rory. Rory only knows about the outside of shiny Apple electronics.

  • rate this

    Comment number 67.

    The problem is that with no competition EE will most likely give us 3.5G for the price of 4G. Then when the others come on board they will have little incentive to increase data rates. Which means the UK will continue to fall behind other parts of the world which are probably already planning 5G. Oh the joys of light-touch regulation! Ofcom more like OfCon from the public’s point of view.

  • rate this

    Comment number 66.

    Rory, you come across as a nice, slightly confused bloke but your ongoing ignorance of technology is an embarrassment. Do you consider trying to go back to finance reporting?

    Oh, and did you manage to get your free iPhone 4.1.1 on your free trip? Or are you still trailing the other tech micro-star, Mr. Fry on this one?

    If you didn't, perhaps you haven't been writing enough about Apple.
    As if!


Comments 5 of 70



  • The OfficeIn pictures

    Fifty landmark shows from 50 years of BBC Two

  • French luxury Tea House, Mariage Freres display of tea pots Tea for tu

    France falls back in love with tea - but don't expect a British cuppa

  • Peter MatthiessenPeter and Paddy

    Remembering two of the greatest travel writers

  • Worcestershire flagFlying the flag

    Preserving the identities of England's counties

  • Female model's bottom in leopard skin trousers as she walks up the catwalkBum deal

    Why budget buttock ops can be bad for your health

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.