Facebook acts on fake ‘likes’

Facebook lgo

"A 'like' that doesn't come from someone truly interested in connecting with a page benefits no one." So begins a blog entry posted by the Facebook security team on Friday. It might look a statement of the obvious - but it signals that the social network is finally emerging from its state of denial about the true value of "likes", which have been presented as a valuable currency to advertisers.

Back in July, we questioned the worth of "likes" and asked whether Facebook was awash with questionable accounts which appeared to like just about anything. But the company was dismissive of our Virtual Bagel experiment which had managed to gain 3,000 "likes" for a non-existent business in a few days by placing some adverts. Fake accounts were not a serious problem and getting thousands of dubious "likes" was not the experience of most advertisers, Facebook told us.

But now the message has changed. The security team at the company is warning that it is now acting to remove "likes" on pages that "may have been gained by means that violate our Facebook terms." That includes fans that have been bulk bought by companies - there is a healthy trade in likes as a quick search will show - and others generated by spam accounts or malware.

Our research showed that all sorts of big brands which boast about the millions who have given them the thumbs up appear to be "liked" in rather unlikely parts of the world. And when we looked at some of the "likers" - for my virtual bagels and for some other pages - quite a few of them seemed to be engaged in "liking" everything they saw, with thousands of businesses benefitting from their admiration.

That kind of behaviour - whether genuine or the result of some automated system - is raising questions about Facebook's usefulness as a platform where businesses can engage with consumers. One correspondent put it to me like this:

"What marketing or demographic value does Facebook see in the fact that an 11-year-old girl I know - who is on Facebook, yes - 'likes' American Express? She doesn't even know what it is, and is 10 years from being able to have an American Express card, at the least."

Now, though, Facebook says it will act to remove those questionable "likes" - which would include an 11-year-old girl if the company could work out its users real ages. The social network says that on average less than 1% of "likes" will be removed, and the move will benefit both businesses and users because the system's integrity will be reinforced.

But some brand owners will no doubt wake up to the fact that the love they thought they were getting from Facebook users is not quite as heartfelt as it appeared. And that in turn may make them "like" Facebook's adverts just a little bit less.

Rory Cellan-Jones Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

As schools grapple with coding revolution many may get left out

A new drive to give children a better set of technology skills is being announced, but are schools prepared?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 52.

    Facebook is a "free" service? It takes your data and sells it to companies and then puts their adverts on your facebook page. When my wife and I visited Venice and signed in from there we had weeks of Italian adverts on our page. But I am OK with that. I keep in touch with distant friends and take no notice of the adverts. My browser works in stealth mode so they can't track me so all is good.

  • rate this

    Comment number 51.

    I've also deleted my facebook account. Too much invasion of privacy by aggressive marketing cookies and unwanted features like timeline. I always regarded my use of it as an experiment to see whether I could cope with social networking - discovered it wasn't worth the time or bother - *unlike*

  • rate this

    Comment number 50.

    Even in this article he drops the name of a credit card company and just in case you missed he drops it again in the next line, mention and repeat is a great way to remember something, He could easily have and should have said "a certain well known credit card" instead of dropping the trademarked copyrighted business name twice in an article that has no relevance on a world news site 'for free'

  • rate this

    Comment number 49.

    I almost feel like i have several puppet accounts who feel the same way, thankfully this is not the case and I am not the only person left in Britain whose life does not revolve around social networking sites or the twittering of twits (just one vowel) and the celebrity chunder that is swamping the areas that used to be reliable for world news albeit from their own self interested perspective.

  • rate this

    Comment number 48.

    Every post deleted questioned the validity of the news herein and the reporter presenting it, regardless what he is reporting it seems he drops the names of big brands relevant or not and I pointed this out after I couldn't help notice it after reading several articles in the 'More from Rory' links. Kudos ElephantTalk good to see i am not the only one challenging the face value presented


Comments 5 of 52



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.