Do you know who wrote this?

 
Hands on keyboard

The web is full of angry people keen to shout down anyone who disagrees with their views on anything from the England football team to their choice of smartphone. And wherever you go, from forums for mothers to newspaper websites, overheated opinionated orators have one thing in common - they hide behind anonymous identities.

But what if some fiendishly clever internet virus suddenly unmasked each and every one of them, so that you discovered that the person calling for the public stoning of unruly kids was actually the mild-mannered spinster across the road?

That is the scenario behind Do You Know Who Wrote This?, a comedy by Jonathan Myerson which you can hear on Radio 4. He has written about the serious issues which inspired this light-hearted drama here.

But be warned, the play features a rank amateur. The part of the BBC's technology correspondent is played by... err, me.

I was in France on holiday when the play was recorded, so we figured out a rather ramshackle way of allowing me to participate. With the other actors speaking their lines via my phone's loudspeaker, I sat in our Breton holiday cottage recording my contribution onto a tablet computer.

Later, I set off to find a good enough 3G signal to send my recordings back to the producer in London. So if the quality of my audio is not up to scratch, that is my fault.

Anyway, do tune in this afternoon if you can. And if you want to add some anonymous insulting comments about my acting at the bottom of this blog, be careful - the truth virus could catch you out.

Listen to Rory Cellan-Jones take part in Do You Know Who Wrote This? on Afternoon Drama on BBC Radio 4 at 14:15 BST on 29 August.

 
Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology correspondent Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

A cloud of uncertainty

Two days after stolen celebrity photos were leaked, nobody is sure how they were obtained.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 52.

    @49
    ..except that is not a new situation..eg. the McLibel case..the internet is simply a new twist on communication..and communication has responsibilities as well as rights

    @50
    Public or anonymous ridicule is ok, whether the odious/silly idea being ridiculed is publicly or anonymously authored, satire has its place..ridicule and 'abuse' are different.. the Interwebz, rhino skin mandatory

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 51.

    50 UU

    Rational and reasonable ideas and factually accurate explanations are often the subject of public ridicule. The fact that ideas and individuals are ridiculed does not makes them wrong - it just makes them abused.

    The shorter the explanation the easier it is to ridicule - and this is why the BBC restricts comments to 400 characters - so the establishment can get away without censure!!!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 50.

    @48 Lamna nasus

    "Public ridicule is a good tool for combating odious or silly ideas even if their author is 'anonymous'.".

    But this would leave you in the position where anonymous ridicule and scorn were deemed wrong, while open ridicule and scorn were deemed OK. That seems inconsistent, and veers far from the sentiment that would have debate ruled by reason and civil argument.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 49.

    48.Lamna nasus
    RE@42
    ‘Unfortunately recent history has rather a lot of examples of individuals who went 'postal' after a fair amount of web warning ‘
    --
    Yet on the flipside some governments and big business have hunted and lambasted anyone who had the courage to stand and fight against them.

    Finding the balance between the safety of the few and the many must be practical and sacrosanct.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 48.

    @44
    Public ridicule is a good tool for combating odious or silly ideas even if their author is 'anonymous'

    @42
    Unfortunately recent history has rather a lot of examples of individuals who went 'postal' after a fair amount of web warning of the personality disintegration taking place..yet readers thought the individual was 'joking'.. right up until the sociopathic act was actually committed...

 

Comments 5 of 52

 

Features

  • John CurticeScotland decides

    Referendum race 'may have got tighter'


  • RihannaCloud caution

    After celebrity leaks, what can you do to safeguard your photos?


  • Cesc FabregasFair price?

    Have some football clubs overpaid for their new players?


  • Woman and hairdryerBlow back

    Would banning high-power appliances actually save energy?


  • Rack of lambFavourite feast

    Is the UK unusually fond of lamb and potatoes?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.