Microsoft unveils Surface Windows 8 tablets
The BBC's Rory Cellan-Jones: "This is a really interesting development"
Microsoft has unveiled Surface - its own-brand family of tablets.
The touchscreen computers will be powered by its upcoming Windows 8 system and contain a choice of an Intel or ARM-based processor.
It allows the firm to challenge Apple's bestselling iPad with a device that can run standard applications such as its own Office programs and Photoshop.
But it puts Microsoft in competition with other manufacturers planning to release tablets designed for Windows 8.
The company's chief executive, Steve Ballmer, said he had wanted to give the software "its own companion hardware".
The devices have 10.6 inch (26.9cm) displays, built-in kickstands and are housed in magnesium cases - which the company described as the first of their kind.
The ARM-based tablets are 9.3mm (0.4 inches) thick - slightly less than the iPad - and run the Windows RT version of the new system. The Verge reported that the chipset will be built by Nvidia. Third-party developers must rewrite programs from scratch to run on the system's Metro interface to work on these devices.
The versions using Intel's x86 technology run Windows 8 Pro and are 13.5mm (0.5 inches) thick. These can run Metro and an updated version of the "classic" desktop meaning they can use software designed for earlier editions of Windows, although some programs will need to be updated to be compatible.
The specifications mean the Surface tablets have bigger screens than the iPad but are heavier.
Pen inputA variety of accompanying covers can be attached using built-in magnets. They double as keyboards with trackpads. One version is flat while the other offers keys that can be depressed.
The devices are also designed to work with a pen accessory using what the firm dubbed "digital ink". When the stylus is held close to the screen of the tablet it ignores touch-input from the users' hands and "samples" the ink at 600dpi (dots per inch).
The ARM-based version will be available with either 32GB (gigabytes) or 64GB of storage. Microsoft said they would be priced at a similar rate to other tablets using the same type of processor built by other firms.
It added that the Intel-based versions would be offered with either 64GB or 128GB of storage and would have price tags comparable to ultrabook laptops.
Different chipsetsTargeting tablets
When Apple unveiled the iPad in 2010 some tech watchers scoffed, dubbing the device a "giant iPod Touch" and questioning whether there was really a market for the product, bearing in mind others had tried and failed to sell sizeable numbers of tablets.
Fast-forward two years and there is no question there is demand for such devices.
Tech research firm IDC recently forecast 107.4 million tablets would be shipped this year with the number growing to 222.1 million by 2016.
It expects Apple's iPad to account for about 62.5% of the market this year with Android devices such as Amazon's Kindle Fire taking a 36.5% share.
IDC does not yet include Windows-based tablets in its market forecasts, but plans to start doing so from July.
It says it does not necessarily believe Windows-based tablets like the Surface will take marketshare from Apple and Android, but says they should grow the overall market for such products.
One tech analyst told the BBC that other hardware makers were likely to feel aggrieved by the news.
"Microsoft can offer a competitive price for these specifications as it doesn't need to pay itself a licence for the Windows 8 software which other manufacturers will have to do, and that might make its PC and tablet-making partners unhappy," said Carolina Milanesi, research vice president at the technology consultants Gartner.
She added that the firm appeared to have focused on a specific part of the market which wanted a more powerful device than the iPad.
"They seem to be be targeting a professional audience," she said.
"So they are going head-to-head with Apple within the corporate sector. Price will be key - these devices won't be at the bottom end of the market. They will probably let other manufacturers fight over that space."
By contrast the tech research firm Forrester said it thought the focus for ARM-based Surface tablets would be consumers, rather than the enterprise sector.
But one of its analysts warned there was a risk customers would shy away if they found it confusing distinguishing between the two types of Windows 8 experience. This will be the first time Microsoft will offer a version of its PC system designed for chips based on ARM's architecture.
Mr Ballmer described Surface as "a whole new community of computing devices"
"Microsoft will be its own worst enemy in this market," blogged Sarah Rotman Epps.
"Consumers aren't used to thinking about chipsets. Choice is a key tenet of Windows, but too much choice is overwhelming for consumers. Apple gets this, and limits iPad options to connectivity, storage, and black⦠or white."
ARM's ambitionsDespite the potential for confusion, British chip designer ARM said it was "excited" by the news.
The firm's designs have already proved popular with smartphone makers, but Microsoft's support for its technology in Windows 8 offers it the potential to expand into a market dominated until now by Intel and AMD.
"This represents a significant milestone in Microsoft's journey to expand the support of the Windows operating system and embrace the ARM architecture," said Lance Howarth, the firm's vice president of marketing.
"With the Surface for Windows RT announcement we are delighted to see yet another example of this partnership in action which follows on from various Windows RT devices demonstrated at Taiwan's Computex show recently."
Intel said it was also "pleased" about Microsoft's move.
"Intel believes in and supports an open and healthy ecosystem that delivers a broad scale of innovation and choice in solutions and user experiences," a statement said.
"We also believe Windows 8 on Intel architecture will deliver the most complete experience with the best performance and compatibility across all computing platforms."
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~20~RS~)


Google acquires kite-power firm
Obama defends 'just' drones war
'Field of diamonds'
The dogulator
Slave pride
Le Shopping?
Talking Movies
Comment number 349.
Tams19th June 2012 - 15:19
It seems to be quite good. Other than the new keyboard and possible the metal casing, nothing really seems to be new, but that doesn't really matter. As it's probably meant to be like Google's Nexus; to drive OEMs, it might do well.
While it does seem to do what its meant to do well, it is missing a laptop mode; I'm not sure it will sit on your lap or other uneven surface well.
Link to this (Comment number 349)
Comment number 134.
Jason19th June 2012 - 10:07
I don't get it. I already have a windows notebook. And it's thin. And it has a REAL keyboard. The specs don't impress me. This looks like netbook to me, a less powerful netbook that is. They need to do a better first, instead of avoiding it.
Link to this (Comment number 134)
Comment number 90.
Dan19th June 2012 - 9:31
This is actually a tablet I would like to purchase, though depends on the connectivity with other machines. If this has a HDMI port out so I could use it for meetings then this would be perfect for business. Being able to run the full office suite and other windows based software is a major selling point.
Link to this (Comment number 90)
Comment number 58.
Kariko19th June 2012 - 9:12
Go up against the iPad is never going to go well. I wish MS would do further research into getting their Surface 2.0 OS for the home environment, as that is really quite a unique bit of kit.
Link to this (Comment number 58)
Comment number 57.
Under-Used19th June 2012 - 9:12
Lets be real about this; these are media display devices. That's how 90% of the people will use them --face book, you tube and email. This device will not have the horsepower to run business applications at a suitable speed. It's an all-in-one chip and consequently will do most things at a performance level slightly lower than a mid-range laptop.
Link to this (Comment number 57)
Comments 5 of 7