Mass Effect 3 row prompts change to add 'further closure'
A change to the ending would be "unprecedented", says IGN's Keza MacDonald
Gamers unhappy with the endings of Mass Effect 3 will get "further closure" thanks to new added content, developer Bioware has announced.
Large numbers of fans had complained that the finale to the popular saga did not live up expectations.
The company said they would provide a number of "game content initiatives" to clarify aspects of the game's plotline.
In a blog post, Bioware co-founder Ray Muzyka described the feedback as "incredibly painful".
"Our first instinct is to defend our work and point to the high ratings offered by critics - but out of respect to our fans, we need to accept the criticism and feedback with humility," he said.
Gamers flocked to forums shortly after the game's release earlier this month to complain that the game's different endings were underwhelming.
Through the series, which made its debut in 2007, players would make choices over how to continue within the game. They been promised that these decisions, of which there were over 1000, would impact the conclusion.
However, thousands complained that Mass Effect 3 only had three alternative endings, with no significant differences between them.
As part of their campaign to have the game changed, supporters have raised more than $70,000 (£44,000) for a children's charity.
“Start Quote
End Quote Ray Muzyka BiowareMass Effect provokes an intense range of highly personal emotions in the player”
Mr Muzyka continued: "Mass Effect 3 concludes a trilogy with so much player control and ownership of the story that it was hard for us to predict the range of emotions players would feel when they finished playing through it.
"The journey you undertake in Mass Effect provokes an intense range of highly personal emotions in the player; even so, the passionate reaction of some of our most loyal players to the current endings in Mass Effect 3 is something that has genuinely surprised us."
It remains to be seen how Bioware will work in the changes in order to satisfy the disgruntled gamers.
Keza MacDonald, UK games editor for IGN.com, said: "It's highly unusual for a developer to release downloadable content [DLC] that actually alters the ending of a game - usually it comes in the form of extra missions or more story details for people who want them.
"Games like Portal and Fallout 3 have had their endings altered slightly to accommodate DLC or a sequel, but that wasn't a reaction to fan requests. It's not certain that Bioware actually will change the ending, but if they do, it'd be pretty much unprecedented."
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~03~RS~)


Google acquires kite-power firm
Obama defends 'just' drones war
'Field of diamonds'
The dogulator
Slave pride
Le Shopping?
Talking Movies
Comment number 68.
Apolloin21st March 2012 - 23:47
There's really no need for everyone to stand around and shake their head at this. It isn't just over-entitled kids throwing a tantrum, there are a large number of reasonable and sane human beings who just feel that a large mistake has been made.
The ending was rushed and mishandled. Bad enough for a TV series, but in an interactive story it's ten times worse. Now they'll fix it. End of story.
Link to this (Comment number 68)
Comment number 67.
Markus21st March 2012 - 23:44
Seriously, all you naysayers, read this newspost from Penny Arcade containing one of the creators of PA's opinion. IT MAKES SENSE. (contains swearing and spoilers)
http://penny-arcade.com/2012/03/14/mass-effect-3-ending-spoiler-warning
By the way, I was unhappy with the way Sonic the Hedgehog 2 ended. I feel I was promised more platforms and more gold rings. Can I demand DLC?
Link to this (Comment number 67)
Comment number 66.
streaky21st March 2012 - 23:43
ME3 ending wasn't a slap in the face, it was a punch in the face then they kicked you when you were down then spat in you. The only thing worth saving in the really nice sentiment after the credits, but that's nothing for what it's worth.
Link to this (Comment number 66)
Comment number 65.
Sensibly Reckless21st March 2012 - 23:40
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 65)
Comment number 64.
K O21st March 2012 - 23:31
People don't recall that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle tried to get rid of Sherlock Holmes but fan outcry and demand made him reconsider & resurrect him. Gamers with a 5 year/3 game run where Decisions mattered want a satisfactory set of endings. No one is having a tantrum as some game reviewers are saying about their own audience. They are simply trying to get a proper farewell to a great franchise.
Link to this (Comment number 64)
Comments 5 of 68