The battle over your data

 
A man speaks on his mobile phone

Would you worry if your mobile phone number was visible to any website you visited? And, if you had put an embarrassing photo online a few years ago, would you expect to be able to expunge all trace of it now?

Two cases for examination in a debate about the balance between privacy and the free flow of information across the internet which pitches consumers against companies.

The first case is yesterday's revelation that the O2 network is sharing customers' mobile phone numbers with any website they visit. The company was quick to act as a storm brewed up on Twitter after an IT systems administrator Lewis Peckover put online a demonstration showing how an O2 number is revealed when a phone visits a site over 3G.

Yes, said the firm, we do share numbers with some "trusted partners" to allow services like age verification, but we never intended that information to go to every website. That was the result of an error during maintenance, and we've now fixed it.

But why would it matter if your number was handed out to a website? A colleague seemed bemused by the fuss - "if I'd rung them then they'd have my number anyway," he pointed out.

The point of course is that it may well be a breach of Britain's current data protection legislation, which lays out rules for how customers' data can be shared and how they are to be informed.

Rory Cellan-Jones explains the pitfalls of "the right to be forgotten"

And now those rules are to be superseded by tougher pan-European rules, which brings us to our second example. The EU's new data protection directive includes an eye-catching measure, the right to be forgotten.

In other words, the right to tell Facebook to remove all of those indiscreet photos from your misspent youth before you go for a job interview. More radically - at least in the view of the web industry - the right to tell search engines and other sites where your photos may have ended up to expunge them too.

The Commissioner behind the new directive, designed to replace 27 different data protection regimes across Europe, has been hailing it as a victory for consumers. Viviane Reding says it will put people back in charge of their personal data, making them more confident about using online services.

But this new layer of internet regulation has opened up divisions in the broad coalition which united last week to oppose the American anti-piracy laws, Sopa and Pipa.

Start Quote

The battle over the future of data is underway, and we are all being invited to take sides”

End Quote

The Open Rights Group (ORG) welcomed the strengthening of privacy, and warned the Commission to ignore complaints about the burden on business. "Facebook and Google are not the best people to take privacy advice from," said ORG's Jim Killock.

And while Facebook and Google were both muted in their public reaction to the directive, Google was much franker off the record.

A senior executive at the search firm told me that two industries which depended on data, advertising and the web, were just about the only things a sclerotic European economy had going for it, and now both were in danger of being strangled by bureaucracy.

"The data protection directive sees data as a bad thing," said the executive, going on to suggest that the best approach was not imposing bureaucratic rules and regulations, but forcing companies to be transparent about their use of data. "Then you can give consumers choice - if they don't like Google's privacy policy, they can choose to go to Bing."

Companies like Google, Facebook and the major advertisers believe consumers are happy enough to share data online, as long as they know how it's used and gain some benefit. But the European Commission thinks it is tapping into growing public anxiety about web firms' cavalier attitude to privacy. The battle over the future of data is underway, and we are all being invited to take sides.

 
Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology correspondent Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

A computing revolution in schools

There will be a whole new way of teaching children about computing, but how much do teachers and parents know about it?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 1.

    For people not worried about this, how about you go to a website, they have your mobile number and then they text you back with a premium rate text. Something you can do absolutely NOTHING about.

    In the UK, this kind of activity is regulated, but on the Internet you are entirely at the mercy of the site you visit. It doesn't even have to be a 'suspect' site, just an unscrupulous one.

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 2.

    If you're worried about privacy online, then bin the computer. It should come as no surprise that if you're using a service for free, then something has got to give.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 3.

    @1.MrK - If that happens call your phone provider immediately and explain to them what has happened. And also ask for your number to be changed.

    So not exactly "something you can do absolutely NOTHING about".

    I have had no problems with my number being displayed online, despite owning an O2 BlackBerry, because I'm not lazy and keep control of my data and know what to do if it gets "lost"...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 4.

    ravenmorpheus2k: So if an unscrupulous website owner decided to send you 10 texts at £1.50 each. That's not a problem? Now, say he decided to do that with 100 people. The phone numbers where sent in the headers of the HTTP request, and as far as i know, there was no way around it when on O2's 3g service. And if the website was hosted somewhere remote: would you really get your money back?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    #3 @ravenmorpheus2k - You cannot stop them performing the initial action of doing something with your number, the onus is then on you to have to stop the process and claim your money back. O2 are doing something they have no need or right to be doing.

    It's also refreshing you seem comfortable about dealing with the huge fallout from, say, identity theft. Many would prefer to avoid it.

 

Comments 5 of 39

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.