Changing channels - can Silicon Valley transform TV?
Leaning back, watching TV
What is the problem with television - and has Silicon Valley got the answers?
For the last decade we have been told that TV is ripe for an internet revolution, but so far the attempts of major software firms like Google and Microsoft to change our viewing habits have made little impact.
But in California I've just met a man who thinks he knows where they have gone wrong.
"Silicon Valley is only now beginning to understand what TV is about," says Maksim Ioffe. "It's a 'lean back' experience, not a 'lean forward' experience as web surfing is.
"You're seeing these growing pains as the hi-tech culture tries to digest and understand television."
Mr Ioffe, whose start-up company Dijit has its own plans to revolutionise TV, is a typical example of the modern Silicon Valley entrepreneur. Born in Eastern Europe, with a computer science degree from a top East Coast American university, he ended up working for technology firms on the West Coast.
“Start Quote
End QuoteLast year Dijit produced an app which turns your phone or tablet into a universal remote control”
Now he has his own business, born just two years ago, with a small office in San Francisco and big plans built around the idea that television does indeed need fixing - even if Silicon Valley hasn't quite got the hang of it yet.
"The consumer experience kind of blows, to use an American expression," he told me. "Companies don't have the best interest of consumers at heart, they don't care about interoperability."
He says there is plenty of choice in terms of content but far too much complexity, with consumers ending up with a stack of set-top boxes, a pile of remotes and no idea how to find anything worth watching.
Dijit's answer is to give the consumer more control via a second screen - the smartphone or tablet computer that many now have on their laps as they lean back and watch TV. Last year Dijit produced an app which, coupled with a little piece of hardware, turns your phone or tablet into a universal remote control.
On top of that it allows you to search all of the content available from your TV or movie service, see what your friends are recommending on social networks, and then press an on-screen button to play the content you choose.
Maksim Ioffe shows his wares
It's one of a number of applications trying to latch on to this second screen social TV phenomenon - in the UK, Zeebox is another. But it's differentiated by the deals Dijit is cutting with hardware manufacturers like Motorola, which is building the app into its latest Xoom tablet.
Mr Ioffe says his is "a small company trying to do something ginormous" - and it might appear unlikely that Dijit will be the firm that proves that Silicon Valley can kick-start the new television revolution.
Apple may have the best chance in the race to create next generation TV - "they understand the consumer the best" - but he is confident his firm can make a difference.
Dijit is heading to Las Vegas next week to unveil a new product at the Consumer Electronics Show, a tiny firm competing with giants like Sony and Samsung to change the world's most powerful entertainment medium. Which takes a lot of chutzpah, but luckily that is a commodity still in plentiful supply in Silicon Valley.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~06~RS~)




Giant Oklahoma tornado kills dozens
Smarter future
Light relief
In pictures
Echoes of revolution
Click
Comment number 1.
rosherville35th January 2012 - 11:36
Well, he doesn't do himself any favours with his website. Horribly fiddly.
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
Simon5th January 2012 - 11:44
If anything people have fewer boxes and remotes thanks to the PVR, which also includes a electronic programme guide. And If you need to be told what to watch by someone on Facebook, then you clearly have no free-will of your own.
No, the biggest thing in TV will be programme content being influenced, live, by online interaction - and we already have the devices required to join in on the sofa.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
Aidy5th January 2012 - 11:59
So to sum up...Microsoft and Google have failed, but Apple will save the day
*sigh*
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
Matt5th January 2012 - 12:27
Not being able to receive content despite a willingness to pay, or having to subscribe to multiple different services forces many consumers into the dark world ... check out this post by New York based, venture capitalist Fred Wilson:
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2012/01/screwcable.html
"Pirate content" will ultimately force media companies to ease consumers frustrations; consumers hate to be abused.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
MyVoiceinYrHead5th January 2012 - 12:41
What we have in the UK is the same problem as elsewhere in the world. The content providers own the distribution.
No box maker will be allowed to freely inlcude Sky services, Sky make money selling boxes and it ties people to your product. The BBC wouldn't let XBox Live inlcude iPlayer because MS charge for it.
AppleTV 1&2 couldn't flourish because Mr Jobs couldn't sign up all the networks
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 41