Ofsted sends ICT to the naughty step
Computers in schools now...
We've heard it from games companies and Google, from pupils and teachers - and now we are hearing it from Ofsted. ICT teaching in schools just isn't up to scratch.
This morning Ofsted has published a report into ICT in schools in England over the last three years. It's couched in fairly bland language but the conclusion is clear - young people are being failed by the standard of teaching and the content of the curriculum when it comes to learning about technology which will be essential to their personal and professional lives.
After examining inspections of ICT teaching in 167 primary, secondary and special schools, the education regulator concludes that the big problem is at the secondary level.
In 30 out of the 74 secondary schools, pupils got to 16 without having been given the skills necessary to progress further in the subject. And in almost a fifth of these schools Oftsed describes achievement in ICT as "inadequate" - a failure rate that would be considered something of a scandal if it applied in some other subjects.
Perhaps the most startling figure in the report is the drop in the number of students taking the GCSE in ICT - down from 81,800 in 2007 to 31,800 this year, a 64% fall. It seems that young people are voting with their feet after suffering dull, uninspiring lessons designed - according to complaints I hear - to prepare them for clerical work rather than give a deep understanding of how to be creative with computers.
...and then
Ofsted's Chief Inspector Miriam Rosen seems to agree:
"In a world that is becoming increasingly reliant on technology," she says, "young people need to be given the opportunity to learn ICT skills in an interesting, challenging and relevant way."
The good news is that there now seems to be a real momentum behind change, with lots of imaginative schemes designed to put a bit of fizz back into ICT teaching.
I'm spending today filming one such scheme, at a south London school, where pupils will be taking part in a competition to design smartphone apps. Instead of banning phones from the premises, this school is integrating them into a lesson, hoping to teach them that ICT can be about creativity rather than just learning about word processing and spreadsheets.
You should be able to see my report on a TV news bulletin later today.
Update 1711: Here's that report from the school.
School children talk about designing their own mobile phone app
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~58~RS~)




Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Disaster on ice
Renegade reporter
Bad tip?
Ye gods
Comment number 1.
headrush14th December 2011 - 11:37
I'm interested in the form this "competition" takes, as I fear that the kids themselves will not be doing any programming. Instead they will probably perform the role of concept artists, with certain guidelines, whose work a professional programmer will "bring to life".
Kids know how to be creative, they need to understand and practice with the low level tools needed to realise their creations.
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
headrush14th December 2011 - 11:52
The low level tools are of course programming languages. Programmers are creators. Schools teach ICT as if they want to produce users, when their job should be to produce creators.
This is a consequence of using Microsoft windows, a proprietary ecosystem that needs users to consume its proprietary output.
Their business model should not constrain our education system.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
TV_As_Eyes14th December 2011 - 11:55
seems such a shame, give a young child some LEGO Mindstorms and they're off. it is a disgrace, though absolutely in character, that successive UK governments have let the children (and their parents) down..
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
ravenmorpheus2k14th December 2011 - 12:16
I went to school in mid to late 80s/early 90s and all IT (as it was then before being re-branded as ICT) lessons in secondary school taught was how to use certain apps.
I had to teach myself how to do things beyond being an end user, something that I found very difficult as I didn't have my own PC.
So why has it taken these people nearly 30 yrs to work out that IT in state schools is abysmal?
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
Eponymous Cowherd14th December 2011 - 12:55
@2 Headrush
Microsoft's C# language is very good. It is powerful, yet relatively easy to learn and the "Express" version of Visual Studio is free.
Obvious concerns about turning kids into MS drones, but your supposition that use of Windows / Microsoft tech precludes learning to program is incorrect.
You can also program in C++, Java, PHP, and more on Windows, all for free.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 35