Money for masts

 
Mobile phone mast

As our 3G survey showed back in August, mobile phone coverage in the UK still leaves quite a lot to be desired. This morning the chancellor promised government action to improve matters.

George Osborne told the Conservative Party conference that up to £150m would be spent to improve mobile coverage, helping up to six million people to get a better signal - or to get connected at all. The aim will be to extend coverage to 99% of the country.

So where will the money be spent? On procuring phone mast sites, apparently, and Ofcom is being given the task of sorting that out. The regulator has welcomed the initiative, and the fact that public funds are being made available - though it stresses that the government will keep hold of the cash and decide how it is handed out. Here's the Ofcom statement:

"We have maintained for some time that market forces alone will not solve these problems. In particular, poor and unreliable coverage, which exists mostly in rural areas, is likely to persist to some degree as there is limited scope for commercially-driven improvements. "

Ofcom confirms that this is the first time public money has been spent nationwide to boost mobile phone coverage. And it all begs several questions. Who will get the money? Who will decide where a new mast is needed? How many masts will be needed? The regulator and the government says the details still have to be worked out.

But this could be very good news for one sector of the mobile industry. Femtocells - essentially mini phone masts that boost coverage in your home - have been the "next big thing" in mobile for some years, without ever really taking off.

Now Picochip, a company which makes them, is claiming they could be the answer both to patchy rural coverage and to the next generation of mobile networks. The firm has just issued a report claiming that 70,000 new cells will be needed to bring 4G broadband to London.

Looking at that, I assumed it meant 70,000 new masts cluttering up the London skyline - and a big headache to get planning permission. But Picochip executives were quick to reassure me that what they were talking about was the kind of box that could be attached to the side of a building or concealed in street furniture. And the firm reckons this could also be a relatively cheap way of taking a broadband signal and beaming it across a village with poor or non-existent mobile coverage.

A warm welcome too for Mr Osborne's idea from Vodafone, which says it has pioneered the commercial use of femtocell technology and is already trialling it in rural locations. "We look forward to talking with the government," the firm says, "about how we can play our part in ensuring everyone gets mobile phone coverage."

But there are still a couple more questions that need to be answered. Why should public money be handed over to a mobile phone industry that is making some very respectable profits? And if Ofcom has been doing its job why, according to its own Consumer Panel, are there almost as many notspots now as there were 10 years ago?

 
Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology correspondent Article written by Rory Cellan-Jones Rory Cellan-Jones Technology correspondent

A computing revolution in schools

There will be a whole new way of teaching children about computing, but how much do teachers and parents know about it?

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Rory

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    I for one hope the relaxed planning laws means laying cable broadband becomes easier so this money can be spent on upgrading to 4G networks.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    The UK is arguably the world leader in small cells, so it is a shame that George Osborne has proposed stimulating masts instead. For example, Japanese operator SoftBank covers vast rural areas with small cells from UK pioneer Ubiquisys.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 3.

    As Orange and T-Mobile have shown it is possible to get phones to use other signals when the 'native' supplier is not available. Government should force all of our mobile operators to enable this (or allow customers to enable this) on their phones and dongles and then charge each other (at not extra cost to the customer). This would reduce not spots and reward the provision of remote sites.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    You have to wonder if the reason why they're doing this is that it'll go down well in Tory heartlands. If they wanted, the mobile phone companies would build them. As you point out Rory, they should be doing this off pat. What's the point of them otherwise?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    As a Tory voter living in a RURAL Tory constituency I don't doubt for a minute that part of the reason is to please us. However surely the economy is the biggest factor. It's the smaller private companies all working and growing together that are going to pull this country up off its knees and start those huge rusty cogs and gears that are the UK economy creaking and clanking into action.

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • Alana Saarinen at pianoMum, Dad and Mum

    The girl with three biological parents


  • Polish and British flags alongside British roadsideWar debt

    Does the UK still feel a sense of obligation towards Poles?


  • Islamic State fighters parade in Raqqa, Syria (30 June 2014)Who backs IS?

    Where Islamic State finds support to become a formidable force


  • Bride and groom-to-be photographed underwaterWetted bliss

    Chinese couples told to smile, but please hold your breath


  • A ship is dismantled for scrap in the port city of Chittagong, BangladeshDangerous work

    Bangladesh's ship breakers face economic challenge


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.