Google boss 'knew about' unlicensed pharmacy adverts

Larry Page in white lab coat Larry Page's involvement is revealed in company documents, said US attorney Peter Neronha

Related Stories

Google's chief executive Larry Page knew that adverts for unlicensed Canadian pharmacies were running on its US site, according to a government prosecutor.

Rhode Island attorney Peter Neronha told the Wall Street Journal that incriminating emails had been uncovered as part of an official investigation.

The search giant agreed last week to pay $500m (£306m) to settle the case.

It declined to comment on the specifics of Mr Neronha's allegations.

Instead, it issued a statement reiterating its regret about what had happened.

"With hindsight, we never should have allowed those ads on Google in the first place," it said.

Revealing documents

Peter Neronha, who led a Justice Department investigation into the advertisement and sale of illegal medicines in the US, was less circumspect in his assessment.

"Larry Page knew what was going on," he told the Wall Street Journal.

The accusation was based on company documents and emails obtained during the course of the investigation, said Mr Neronha.

However, he declined to go into detail about Mr Page's involvement or what was contained in the files, according to the newspaper, "citing grand jury secrecy".

The claims are impossible to verify as documents relating to the case are not currently in the public domain.

It is unlikely that the matter will ever get an airing in court as both sides signed a non-prosecution agreement as part of the settlement.

Rule breaking

Google was advised in 2003 by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy that it was illegal to import non-controlled prescription drugs into the United States.

Yet a number of Canadian pharmacies were advertising such products through the company's AdWords system and shipping them to US-based customers.

According to prosecutors, Google later blocked overseas pharmacies from targeting US users, but allowed Canadian companies to continue their activities, even providing them with advertising support.

It finally launched a clamp-down in 2009 when it learned of the government's investigation.

In August 2011, the company agreed to forfeit the estimated $500m that it had made from running such adverts.

Google also put in place a number of new compliance procedures to make sure that such action would not be repeated in future.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More Technology stories

RSS

Features

  • RihannaCloud caution

    After celebrity leaks, what can you do to safeguard your photos?


  • Cesc FabregasFair price?

    Have some football clubs overpaid for their new players?


  • Woman and hairdryerBlow back

    Would banning high-power appliances actually save energy?


  • Rack of lambFavourite feast

    Is the UK unusually fond of lamb and potatoes?


  • Members of staff at James Stevenson Flags hold a Union Jack and Saltire flag UK minus Scotland

    Does the rest of the UK care if the Scots become independent?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.