Is the air escaping from the tech bubble?
Pandora lost $1.8m in its most recent full year
We've seen something of a technology bubble over the last six months, with valuations of the likes of Facebook and Groupon soaring to levels many consider insane, and desperate investors rushing to get their hands on shares in newly-floated tech firms.
But is this the week that the bubble bursts, as investors wake up to the fact that hot new stocks may prove as fragile as they were in the last dotcom boom?
I've been keeping an eye on the prices of the business social network LinkedIn and Pandora, the internet streaming radio service, and wondering whether history is repeating itself.
LinkedIn's IPO in May was greeted with euphoria, the price soaring to $122 on the opening day, briefly making it worth $10bn. That on profits last year of around $15m.
This week it was Pandora's turn to enjoy the limelight. In frantic first-day trading, the internet radio business which is still unprofitable saw its shares soar way above the initial price range.
At one point they hit $26 and Pandora was worth over $2bn. Just to put that into context, UTV Media, a profitable media business operating UK radio stations such as TalkSport, is valued by the market at something like £120m.
But in the last week, the price of LinkedIn has sagged, falling back below $70. And in the last 24 hours, the air has rapidly come out of Pandora's balloon, with its share price now heading back below $13.
Now investors may be just taking a breather before inflating the bubble even further, but this all reminds me of what I saw in the UK on 14 March 2000.
Back then a tiny business called lastminute.com arrived on the stockmarket to huge excitement, its price pumped to ridiculous levels by investors who were desperate not to miss out on the latest hot dotcom stock. But that proved to be the day the music stopped.
Very quickly, the price of this and other dotcom stocks started heading south, and other high-tech hopefuls found it impossible to get a stock market flotation.
There are big differences between then and now. In 1999 and 2000 any company connected with technology saw its shares soar. This bubble has not lifted the price of every business, with investors more discriminating in their enthusiasms.
Just look at the Blackberry-maker RIM, which has seen its shares fall by more than two thirds since February, or the even more serious plight of Nokia.
But until this week any new business that looked "social" has apparently been exempt from the normal rules of investment. Perhaps we will look back on 17 June 2011 as the day that social bubble burst. Then again, I'm not putting any money on it.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~10~RS~)




Thousands rally to oppose Italy cuts
Patience of Job
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
Most wanted
Story of the S-Class
Fast Track
Comment number 17.
DaveC21st June 2011 - 22:47
And Groupon is another, recently all the news seems to be of people asking if the site is overvalued
Link to this (Comment number 17)
Comment number 16.
Gregor20th June 2011 - 12:32
A bubble is definately building up. I've been following a couple of small companies who are suddenly worth quite a bit. And for what?
Then there are big ones like Facebook - huge value, yet they are not ready and don't want to disclose their profits. Despite their founder blabing about how everything should be open. I am not so sure they are actually creating profits...
Link to this (Comment number 16)
Comment number 15.
jez20th June 2011 - 11:17
I reremember that it was more World Online (WOOL) and the actions of the founder there that really blew up the bubble in 2000? It came out that they had sold most of their stock to a hedge fund 3 months before the float, which then pumped the stock 7x and dumped it on the first day of trading.
Link to this (Comment number 15)
Comment number 14.
steve20th June 2011 - 9:31
@BluesBerry, if I were coding you as an HTML element, you would definitely be a div...
Link to this (Comment number 14)
Comment number 13.
BluesBerry19th June 2011 - 15:48
British media reported US was developing non-English software that will allow it to manipulate social media to influence Internet conversations & spread pro-American propaganda. These moves - ignoring sovereignty of other nations - have aroused the legitimate concerns about online safety.
Link to this (Comment number 13)
Comments 5 of 17