Primitive human society 'not driven by war'

 
Soldier Some have said war is an innate part of human behaviour - but this research suggests otherwise

Related Stories

Primitive society was not driven by war, scientists believe.

Researchers from Abo Academy University in Finland say that violence in early human communities was driven by personal conflicts rather than large-scale battles.

They say their findings suggest that war is not an innate part of human nature, but rather a behaviour that we have adopted more recently.

The study is published in the journal Science.

Patrik Soderberg, an author of the study, said: "This research questions the idea that war was ever-present in our ancestral past. It paints another picture where the quarrels and aggression were primarily about interpersonal motives instead of groups fighting against each other."

Motives for murder

The research team based their findings on isolated tribes from around the world that had been studied over the last century.

Start Quote

As humans settled down, then war becomes more dominant and present”

End Quote Patrik Soderberg Abo Academy University

Cut off from modern life and surviving off wild plants and animals, these groups live like the hunter gatherers of thousands of years ago.

"They are the kind of societies that don't really rely on agriculture or domestic animals - they are primitive societies," explained Mr Soderberg.

"About 12,000 years ago, we assume all humans were living in this kind of society, and that these kind of societies made up about for about 90% of our evolutionary path."

Using the modern tribes as an analogy for earlier society, the researchers looked at cases where violent deaths had been documented.

They found 148 such deaths but very few were caused by war.

"Most of these incidents of lethal aggression were what we call homicides, a few were feuds and only the minority could be labelled as war," Mr Soderberg said.

Hunter gatherer The scientists looked at modern hunter gatherer societies to trace the history of war

"Over half the events were perpetrated by lone individuals and in 85% of the cases, the victims were members of the same society."

Most of the killings were driven by personal motives, he added, such as family feuds or adultery.

The researchers admitted that modern communities were not a perfect model for ancient societies, but said the similarities were significant and did provide an insight into our past.

Mr Soderberg said: "It questions the idea that human nature, by default, is developed in the presence of making war and that war is a driving force in human evolution."

Instead, he thinks that war may have developed later.

As the hunter gatherers made the transition to farming, groups became more territorial and with a more complex social structure.

"As humans settled down, then war becomes more dominant and present. For these primitive societies, war has not yet entered the picture," he added.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 128.

    It has been shown that in the time of the hunter gatherers, there was conflict and it was violent, but quite often this violence did not result in death, that bones from the people of this time, showed injuries that had healed after conflict. This suggests that intertribal war was about justice, but not neccasarily a death sentence. Perhaps the first recognised rules of war.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 74.

    Wars are usually fought over land or religion. Only when we setlted down and built farming communities did we feel the need to war. War over land and resources.

    Sadly the more "civilised" we become, the more uncivilised our nature becomes,

    They call the hunter gatherers "primitive" yet they live a far more natural existance than we do.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 53.

    This report is confirmation of what has been known for quite a while. Hunter gatherer societies are too busy - uh - hunting and gathering to fight turf wars, ideological wars and (currently fashionable) resource wars. Population pressure has a lot to do with it too but politically, that's a tricky one.

  • rate this
    +21

    Comment number 51.

    We are not naturally warlike, but our leaders and their backers often are by nature. It's part of the make-up of those desiring to govern vast populations.
    Ordinary people have no desire for war as it goes against our natural survival instinct, but societies & leaders condition us to fear and hate, keeping us in readiness for the next time we're required to pay for or die to serve their ambitions.

  • rate this
    +24

    Comment number 28.

    I wouldn't expect war to develop until there is competition for space.

    Primitive people could spread out and stay separate in their separate groups. There wouldn't be anything to fight about, particularly.

    The conclusions of the study aren't surprising, therefore.

 
 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features

  • Mother and childConstant fear

    Saving lives on the front line in the battle with Ebola


  • Dog's headCanine quirk

    The dogs that used to collect money on Britain's railways


  • Hazal Naz BesleyiciHa, ha, ha

    Why are women in Turkey posting laughing selfies?


  • Robert Graves' PoetryUnforgettable war Watch

    The writer who had a lump of granite stuck in his head


  • Hands of clergy in prayer'Two per cent'

    How many men are paedophiles - and is the same true of priests?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.