Sea levels are rising - but how quickly?

 
Glacier Sea level rise remains one of the big unknowns of climate science

Scientists are warning that the level of the sea may rise by slightly more than previously forecast - but they also say that the very worst predictions look much less likely.

Confused? If so, you're not alone.

The future of sea level rise is one of the most important questions in climate science because so many millions around the world live beside coasts - but it's also one of the most difficult to answer.

One of the authors of a new study, published today, even described the uncertainties of the field with that memorable phrase first coined by the former US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld: "unknown unknowns".

Not everyone is always so open about this.

I'll never forget a video screened at the opening session of the UN's climate talks in Copenhagen in 2009 - the conference that got nowhere - which portrayed this issue at its most simplistic.

One scene showed a vast flood that left a little girl hanging from a tree screaming her heart out.

The message to delegates was crude: "If you don't negotiate a climate deal, the kid gets it".

Start Quote

The headline is that forecasts of the changes to the ice-sheets and glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic suggest their melting could contribute between 3cm-36cm to sea level rise.”

End Quote

I reported at the time that nothing in the scientific literature was specific enough to justify this lurid threat.

In the event, none of the major players was paying attention to this climate horror show anyway and there was no treaty.

Then and now

So what did the science say back then and what does it say now?

The last major report by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), its Fourth Assessment Report published in 2007, concluded that the global average level of the sea may rise by between 18cm-59cm.

Much of that was expected to come from what's called "thermal expansion" - the physical process by which the volume of a body of water expands as it warms, as the oceans are.

But, crucially, the IPCC said that not enough was known about the other great potential contributor to sea level rise - the melting of the polar ice sheets and glaciers.

Polar melting has been a kind of wild card in these calculations: a sudden acceleration in melting could cross some hidden threshold and trigger runaway melting that would cause an unexpected surge. Or not.

To try to fill that gap in the knowledge, a leading British polar researcher, Professor David Vaughan of the British Antarctic Survey, and teams of colleagues came together in a consortium called Ice2sea.

Start Quote

One conclusion is that the very scariest scenarios look less likely.”

End Quote

So what does the new study tell us? The headline is that forecasts of the changes to the ice-sheets and glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic suggest their melting could contribute between 3cm-36cm to sea level rise.

This would add another 10cm to the upper range of the last IPCC forecast.

This perhaps does not sound like much of a change - and the range in numbers is still pretty large spanning from "not very much at all" to "quite a bit".

But Prof Vaughan and others say the estimate is much more robust than earlier ones and provides more clarity for policy-makers.

In any case a rise on slightly larger bigger scale would of course be serious for communities in low-lying countries. I saw for myself how most the tiny island nation of Tuvalu is already only 2-3m above sea-level.

Assumptions made

The challenge with all forecasts - especially on this question - is that they rely on a whole series of factors and assumptions.

Tuvalu Tuvalu fears rising tides

The Ice2sea researchers started with a global climate model that assumed a particular scenario for the rise in greenhouse gases. It then used further models to investigate the potential change in climate in regions such as Greenland and Antarctica.

Another layer of computer simulations explored how the ice might respond. Final stages investigated what that could mean for sea level not just globally but also on particular coasts.

Hence the large range of possible outcomes.

On top of that, the ice-sheets and glaciers themselves are often inaccessible and hard to measure. One research effort even involved firing hi-tech javelins at a glacier in Antarctica.

And satellite data only stretches back a few decades.

Interestingly, one conclusion is that the very scariest scenarios look less likely.

There is only a one in 20 chance, they reckon, that by 2100 coastal towns in the Thames Estuary, Holland and Ireland may get hit by extreme surges about one metre higher than now.

At a media briefing, I asked what that meant and whether we could take it that there's a 95% chance that this won't be what happens. That's right, I'm told. The very gloomiest warnings look far less plausible.

The most certain piece of knowledge is that the global average sea level has been rising by about 3mm a year.

But what really matters is whether this will accelerate - and by how much. And all that's still a work in progress.

 
David Shukman Article written by David Shukman David Shukman Science editor

Five steps to landing on a comet

How do you land on a comet? That's problem facing the people running Esa's Rosetta mission after the successful rendezvous with Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 90.

    @2 and 4 (two lowest rated)

    *head desk*

    thats right up there with "its cold today, the globe cant possibly be warming"

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 89.

    The rising sea levels may not be alarming, but it is confirmation of global warming. MORE WATER, MEANS LESS ICE.

    The real problems are droughts in the Amazon, China and Africa.
    You worry about paying tax?
    You can pay for a clean energy transformation now, or for millions of refugees later.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 88.

    acid rain as reduced enormously, but co2 is a more worldwide problem, the west is dealing with the problem on a personal scale, the building trade is far better and more adequatley prepared for energy efficiancy than ever before, cars and transport in general are better, but the emerging economies are the fly in the ointment, and how do we tell them not to do what made some of us rich?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 87.

    I can't give you the link because it's subscription only, but New Scientist has a very interesting article 'Where melting ice means lower seas' 6th May 2013.
    The whole business is a lot more complex than uniform sea level rise.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 86.

    @78 DSA

    The acid rain you talk of just vanished with time you mean? By itself?
    It took lots of countries much coordinated effort to curb sulpher and nitric oxides.
    They reduced these emissions by more than 95% That is why it stopped raining acid. And that is how we should be handling the CO2 emissions! Thank you for reminding us.

 

Comments 5 of 90

 

Features

  • OrangemanPunctured pride?

    How would N Ireland's Orangemen feel if Scotland left the union?


  • MarchionessThames tragedy

    Survivors and victims' families remember Marchioness disaster


  • Sheep on Achill IslandMass exodus

    Why hundreds of thousands of people have left Ireland


  • A teenaged mother in the Zaatari campUntold misery

    The plight of Syria's refugee child brides


  • Michael MosleyMeat feast?

    Which is the best eco option - eating beef, chicken or mussels?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.