Herschel space telescope to go blind

 
Betelgeuse Herschel has built a huge catalogue of far-infrared and sub-mm images of the sky. This recently released image shows the layers of gas shed by Betelgeuse, one of the most familiar stars in the night sky
Cygnus-X Herschel will be remembered as the telescope that produced great vistas of gas and dust, as here in the constellation of Cygnus. Invisible to optical telescopes like Hubble, these billowing clouds and threading filaments trace the locations where future stars will form
Eagle With its far-infrared detectors, Herschel has been able to re-visit familiar objects to provide new data. This picture shows the classic “Pillars of Creation” in the Eagle Nebula, in the constellation Serpens. At long wavelengths, the clouds of gas and dust in the pillars glow, revealing processes at play in star formation
Goods survey Herschel has sought to study the evolution of galaxies. In this image taken of a small patch of sky in the constellation of Ursa Major, countless galaxies are recorded. Some of these fuzzy blobs are many billions of light-years distant
Comet One of Herschel's instruments is called HIFI. The spectrograph's job is to untangle the chemistry of space. Its study of Comet Hartley 2 showed the object to have water-ice with a similar composition to Earth's oceans
Andromeda At a relatively close distance of 2.5 million light-years, Andromeda is very similar in size to our own Milky Way Galaxy. Here, Herschel's observations (orange) are combined with the Newton XMM telescope's (blue)
RCW 120 Herschel's view of RCW 120, a bubble of gas and dust in space around a massive star. Another huge star, 8-10 times the mass of our Sun, is forming on the bubble's boundary - seen as a bright white object
Twisted ring Herschel has revealed new things about our own galaxy. Here, looking towards the centre of the Milky Way, it spies a ribbon of cold gas and dust that is more than 600 light-years across and which appears to be twisted. Scientists have yet to explain it

The European Space Agency (Esa) is about to lose the use of one of its flagship satellites.

Since 2009, the billion-euro Herschel telescope has been unravelling the complexities of star birth and galaxy evolution.

But its instruments employ special detectors that need to be chilled to fantastically low temperatures.

The helium refrigerant that does this job will run out in a few weeks and when it does, Herschel will go blind.

The coming demise of the telescope is no surprise. It is occurring just as was forecast at the start of the mission, almost to the month.

Researchers are now busy running through a final list of observations, acquiring as many images as they can in the time left available.

Already, thousands of pictures have been deposited in the Herschel archive, which is set to become a key reference source for decades into the future.

"I think there is a consensus in the community that Herschel has been a tremendous success and that we have made beautiful observations," Esa project scientist Dr Göran Pilbratt told BBC News.

The telescope was launched almost four years ago and sent to an observing position 1.5 million km from Earth.

It was equipped with a 3.5m mirror - the largest monolithic mirror ever flown - and three state-of-the-art instruments sensitive to long wavelengths of light, in the far-infrared and sub-millimetre range (55 to 672 microns).

Herschel diagram (BBC) The Herschel telescope has to be kept extremely cold to study its frigid targets

This technology has allowed Herschel to study the processes at play as large clouds of gas and dust collapse to form new stars. Its deep vision has also enabled scientists to trace the story of how galaxies have changed through cosmic time.

But the design of the instruments, and in particular of their detectors, has required Herschel be operated close to absolute zero (-273.15C).

Herschel Space Telescope

 Herschel mirror
  • Herschel is one of the largest space telescopes ever launched; its 3.5m diameter mirror perfectly captures infrared light
  • Infrared shines through gas and dust clouds that can block visible light - Herschel can see deep into dusty star-forming regions
  • The telescope is named after the astronomer William Herschel who discovered infrared radiation while studying the Sun in 1800
  • The Earth's atmosphere absorbs infrared, so Herschel was launched into space in 2009 to get a clear view of the infrared Universe

This has been achieved with the aid of a cooling system run on superfluid helium, more than 2,000 litres of which were loaded into the telescope at launch.

The cryogen has gradually boiled off during the course of the mission, and the latest calculation from engineers is that it will be gone entirely sometime in the final two weeks of this month.

Once the detectors start to warm from their ultra-frigid state, they will stop working. The end, when it happens, will be quite sudden.

Those astronomers in the queue to use Herschel at that moment will no doubt be disappointed, but also philosophical: observing time was allocated on the basis that the opportunity could not be guaranteed as the mission moved into its end phase.

Some engineering tests will be conducted on the telescope in April. The Esa operations team will then put the satellite into a slow drift around the Sun before ceasing all communications.

Prof Matt Griffin, from Cardiff University, is team leader on the Spire instrument, which is sensitive to some of the longest wavelengths. He said the telescope had exceeded all expectations.

"It will be a sad day when it makes its last observation, but the data that it has collected during its lifetime will keep astronomers busy for years," he told BBC News.

"For the next three years, the Spire team will work hard to put all Spire data into the best possible condition to be as easy as possible to access and to use in the future.

"Amongst Herschel's most exciting results have been the detection of many thousands of distant star-forming galaxies that are helping us understand how galaxies formed and evolved over cosmic time, and the mapping out in our own galaxy of the filaments and cores that are the sites of new suns being formed today."

 
Jonathan Amos, Science correspondent Article written by Jonathan Amos Jonathan Amos Science correspondent

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 73.

    A tremendous amount of science achieved, but the thing that grabbed my attention in this article is the picture of the mirror – what a beautiful artefact.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 72.

    Much debate about the refueling issue.

    I think if it was feasible, ESA would have done it. Sadly Herschel is so far away that a mission to refuel it would probably be nearly as expensive as it would be to just build another one.

    Thankfully we have the James Webb telescope launching in a few years which will take over the great work that Herschel has done.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 71.

    @66 cray74: The decision has been made: we're pushing Herschel off into a heliocentric orbit, not crashing it into the Moon.

    @67 CP/M: As cray74 says, adding another camera would have cost money, mass, and power. But the real issue is that the Herschel primary mirror was only polished to be perfect at far-IR wavelengths. At visible wavelengths, it would yield pretty poor images.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 70.

    Robotic maintenance crew. They can be used to recover and clear old satellites and debris. Attach ion drives for satellite destruction where necessary, build a solar furnace for melting old components down to useable material. The amount of stuff up there we should be looking at it's use in space using robotic workers to make/repurpose items.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 69.

    @67 CP/M: The extra camera cost would've been a deal breaker. Useful space-based astronomical gear (spectrographs, photometers, and even 'simple' cameras) are products of enormous engineering efforts. NASA got 2 free Hubble-class spy satellites last year but can't afford to use them - the instrument payloads would cost $100s of millions to develop.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 68.

    I think it would make a good project to have a mission to repurpose this satellite using small robots to rebuild the satellite. It seems such a waste having got the mirror into space just to abandon it. The lessons learnt in using and deploying maintenance robots could prove invaluable for future deep space missions.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 67.

    Here's a daft thought - how much more would it have cost to include a visible-wavelength camera which could be swapped in when the helium ran out?

    Thinking outside the (cool) box.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 66.

    @63 Editor Spick: The ESA plans to nudge Herschel (with its onboard fuel reserves) from its L2 point either into a solar orbit that won't encounter Earth for centuries, or collide it with the moon in a search for lunar water.

    @65 Hobo: RTGs have consistently survived atmospheric entries and rocket explosions; even the Apollo 13 RTG is intact on the bottom of the Pacific.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 65.

    63 Editor Spick - Unfortunately the amount of energy required to send something into the Sun is collosal. Smashing things into the Moon might be a viable alternative, If every probe sent up contained a small ion engine then it could be done.
    Might be a worry if they contain an RTG though.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 64.

    So long and thanks for all the inspiration, Herschel.

    We shall fire a golden carriage clock your way as a token of our esteem.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 63.

    If it now becomes a useless artifact,,should we not now send it on a course directly to the Sun, instead of an orbit? The materials used in construction would then be naturally re-cycled and we are not left with yet another piece of junk floating around space.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 62.

    Helium, as with pretty much every other finite resource, we are wasting irresponsibly.

    If, let's take a flight of maximum improbability, more helium could be magically be taken to Herschel, it would be a good excuse to deprive those of our kind who waste it for fun inhaling it.

    Science will only save humanity if we let it. Herschel is a good example of what can be done.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 61.

    This has built-in obsolescence.
    Purpose served!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 60.

    Re others comments. There is a technology that is appropriate for things like the refilling of a satellite like Herschel - or manned missions to Mars and beyond. The technology is nuclear thermal rockets - it was developed in the US in the 60’s-70’s and called project NERVA.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA
    The politics over the death of NERVA is fascinating and horrifying and disgusting.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 59.

    Send up the shuttle?
    It's at L2, around 1.5 Million Km away. Give or take.

    That's about 3 times further than the moon, and a quick lap around that is as far as mankind has ever been.

    I'd guess the Hubble repair mission would be about as far as the shuttle has ever been. Something around 600Km. Give or take.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 58.

    I can't be the only one to think, "Well, why don't they just send up the shuttle with some replacement coolant." Followed by a second's pause and an expletive, " - No shuttle!"

    Just think what would have happened to Hubble without the shuttle. The world needs better ways of handling off-earth projects - perhaps the Chinese will develop one and sell us some space.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 57.

    The instrument may have had a limited life span but the data it collected will be for ever. Great project!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 56.

    I dont think the person who marked down your comment has read any Douglas Adams. Top Pun!

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 55.

    So long and thanks for all the pics, so sad that it should come to this.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 54.

    #52

    Here here! ESA IMO are one of the best examples of European co-operation, are highly respected, and get a lot of "bang for their buck"

    NASA unfortunatly waste an awful lot of money on pet projects of the various cliques, too much managment and infighting.

 

Page 1 of 4

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.