Hot potatoes! BASF drops GM spud plans in EU
The genetically modified potato project gained approval at EU level but was a commercial failure
The ever changing story of Europe's relationship with biotechnology took another twist recently when the giant German chemical firm BASF announced it was halting the development of all its GM potato varieties in Europe.
The company was approved to grow a commercial GM potato called Amflora in 2010. This variety had been modified to produce more of a type of starch that is useful for papermaking and other industrial processes.
“Start Quote
End Quote Pete Riley GM freezeThe EU Commission is a one trick pony, it is GM, GM, GM.”
But from the start, Amflora potatoes struggled to gain market share and just a year after getting the green light, they were only being grown on a two-hectare site in Germany.
A year ago, BASF said it was moving its biotech headquarters to North Carolina and halting the commercialisation of GM products for the European market.
Spud you like?The company had also been seeking approval for three other GM varieties, but it has now taken the decision to walk away from Europe altogether.
According to BASF's Jennifer Moore-Braun, it wasn't just the lack of enthusiasm among European consumers and farmers - it was the lack of political support, with no sign of that changing.
GM maize is now the only crop approved for use in the EU
"No-one from the political side supported it. There were no signals from the European Commission that any change was likely," she told BBC News.
And it is fair to say that the BASF move comes at the same time when there appears to be confusion in Europe about what the Commission is going to do about the issue.
Several recent reports indicated that the new EU health commissioner, Tonio Borg, might seek a freeze on the approval of new GM crops until at least 2014.
But that doesn't appear to be the case.
What Mr Borg seems to be trying to do is actually clarify and possibly liberalise the regulations on growing GM across the EU bloc.
Apart from the BASF potato, there is only one other GM crop approved for commercial growing in the EU - a strain of maize developed by Monsanto called MON810.
That is because the EU's strenuous approval process has given new meaning to the phrase "slow food" - it took 13 years to get the go-ahead for Amflora.
Blocking BorgThe current rules mean that any crop that's approved at EU level can be grown anywhere in the Union unless countries have specific scientific reasons for blocking it.
At present, eight countries - Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg and Poland - have used this provision to stop the technology.
Mr Borg now hopes to drive forward rules that would shorten the approval process by giving individual countries the right to approve or ban GM varieties.
But the three most important words in the EU could stall the Borg initiative. France, Germany and Britain.
These countries see the plan as a breach of the single market and that for them is more important than GM.
Pete Riley from campaign group GM Freeze says the Commission is under pressure from the US and the World Trade Organisation to lift the ban on the technology.
"The EU Commission is a one trick pony, it is GM, GM, GM," he says. "It is safe to say they are frustrated the member states don't share that vision," he added.
GM spuds may now be off the menu, but the underlying issue is likely to run and run.
Follow Matt on twitter.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~32~RS~)




Syria army storms rebel-held town
Teutonic Texans
Foot loose
Clocking out
Tortured for ransom
The Culture Show
Comment number 222.
quietoaktree2nd February 2013 - 23:41
Re #221
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/02/genetically-modified-crops-pesticides_n_1931020.html
Link to this (Comment number 222)
Comment number 221.
quietoaktree2nd February 2013 - 23:28
GM plants and the Herbicides/ Insecticides are under pressure also in the USA - they have failed in what the companies had promised.
..Super weeds and decreasing yields are the result. If it wasn´t for the high commodity prices -- many US farmers would be bankrupt.
-- Weeds are removed by hand and many farmers have seen their land ruined.
Link to this (Comment number 221)
Comment number 220.
John_from_Hendon2nd February 2013 - 22:31
The REASON that most GM seeds should be banned is the technological lock-in. (The way that once used the producer HAS to buy the related products, and next year's, seed from the same supplier.) This is essentially an anti-trust problem not a matter of unsafe food.
First we need to prohibit and ban known dangers - like all tobacco products for example, then fix the technological lock-ins of GM.
Link to this (Comment number 220)
Comment number 219.
Morgan2nd February 2013 - 22:09
218,what? 162 Little- You argue with such aggression and conviction but your understanding of the subject is so poor. F1 seeds arent always sterile they produce seed that doesn't come true to form. Yes the use of traditional breeding methods can include genes you don't want,I never said anything contrary.Its the inclusion of non related genes across species and the instability that is the danger.
Link to this (Comment number 219)
Comment number 218.
plebianbob2nd February 2013 - 21:43
Let's ban artificial selection, in fact, why don't we just ban evolution?
Link to this (Comment number 218)
Comments 5 of 222