Bloodhound rocket test signals coming land speed record reality

 
Bloodhound SSC Image: Bloodhound SSC

Build it and they will come. The project to make a car capable of going 1,000mph (1,610km/h) is finalising the budget to complete its construction.

There then requires just the money to run it for at least two years - the time it will take first to breach the current land speed record (763mph or 1,228km/h), and thereafter to raise it beyond 1,000mph.

The thinking is that once people see the Bloodhound SuperSonic Car (SSC) for real, the sponsors necessary to complete the job will make themselves available. That's the idea, anyway.

For as long as Bloodhound remains just a "paper vehicle" (or the dream of a computer animator), there will inevitably be some hesitancy, some doubts... which makes this week's first UK firing of the car's hybrid rocket engine all the more important. It's a very visible demonstration of progress.

"We've been very good at being a virtual car, if you like," says chief engineer Mark Chapman.

"We rely very heavily on computational methods, computational design, and we do some great imagery. And people go, 'well, when's that going to happen?'

"But we're now in manufacture. So perhaps the biggest statement to make is [that] this is the rocket test fire, but this is also the first stage of a column of dominoes that will fall over the next six to 12 months, meaning this time next year we will be in South Africa running the car."

To recap for those who haven't been following this project that closely, Bloodhound is essentially the same team that claimed the land speed record for Britain in 1997.

Then, RAF fighter pilot Andy Green became the first driver to break the sound barrier in a car called Thrust SSC at Black Rock Desert in the US. The project was headed by Richard Noble, with Ron Ayers acting as the chief aero engineer.

US firing of 18in chamber The 18in chamber has been fired before in the US, but the Newquay test will double the chamber pressure

All three are back in this new effort which was launched as an education initiative to spur children's interest in Stem subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics). To date, more than 5,000 schools are using the example of Bloodhound and the science of fast cars to enliven their classroom studies.

Quite a number of these children will be on hand at Newquay Cornwall Airport's Aerohub this Wednesday to witness the live firing of Bloodhound's 18in by 12ft (45cm by 3.6m) hybrid motor.

Bloodhound will use three engines to go 1,000mph. Its main power plants are a Eurofighter-Typhoon engine and the hybrid rocket. But the vehicle also incorporates a Cosworth F1 V8 engine as well. Remarkably, its role is "merely" to push a liquid oxidiser into the rocket's fuel chamber.

It will achieve this by driving a high-performance pump, which is actually an updated version of a unit that was used on the UK's old nuclear cruise missiles.

Engineers have the complex task of getting the rocket, the F1-CA2010 engine, and its missile pump to all work in perfect unison.

The Newquay test will be the first time the Bloodhound team has seen the trio and their control system run in anger. It's R&D in public.

Testing will be conducted inside a concrete-hardened hangar used in the past to house Tornado fighter-bombers.

The shelter was built to withstand attack by enemy bombers so if anything should go awry, the watching public - huddled in another Tornado shelter - should be perfectly safe.

Go faster

Britain was very much at the forefront of rocket development during the post-war years.

The Thrust SSC Land Speed Racer races down the Nevada desert floor as it sets the land speed record at Black Rock Desert in Nevada Thrust SSC in its 1997 land speed record run

The biggest system ever tested in the UK was the Blue Streak ICBM. This was done on a static test stand in Cumbria in the early 1970s (300,000lbf; 1,300kN).

More recently, in the 1980s, the Stonechat motors for the Falstaff research rocket were fired at Wescott in Buckinghamshire (60,000lbf; 270kN).

The Bloodhound hybrid is probably the most impressive since then.

"This rocket's designed to produce an average thrust of 25,000lbf, or 111kN, for 20 seconds; and that's what's required in conjunction with the jet engine to get Bloodhound to that 1,000mph," Daniel Jubb, the brains behind the power unit, told me.

"It actually needs to produce a peak thrust of 27,500lbf (122kN), and that peak thrust needs to be right at the end of the burn when the aerodynamic forces on the car, the drag, are at their highest.

"We're actually running at just over half-full chamber pressure on Wednesday, so because the nozzle is optimised for the full thrust firing, we're not going to see massively high levels of thrust, but we then have a series of development firings from later this year through to early spring in which we'll progressively increase the chamber pressure until we get the full performance."

In Wednesday's test, liquid oxidiser (high-test peroxide, or HTP) will be fed into the chamber at a pressure of 600psi (4MPa) to react with the solid fuel (hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene, or HTPB). This should deliver an average thrust of 12,000-14,000lbf (50-60kN) with a peak somewhat over that. The burn will last 10 seconds.

Assuming all goes well, subsequent firings will eventually take the rocket up to its full performance.

As Daniel Jubb explained, a further four "R&D" burns should then prove the technical requirements of the rocket. There will also be an additional 10 "safety and acceptance" firings that will explore some of the rocket's limits, to certify the system for use in a manned vehicle.

All these firings are expected to take place in Newquay. Indeed, when the car does its first roll tests, it is likely to use the Aerohub runway, which means the Cornwall town is going to be an interesting place over the coming year.

It turns out that the full performance of the rocket is not needed to break the land speed record. The team plans to run it in a monopropellant mode only next year. In this configuration, the HTP is passed over a catalyst pack to decompose it into steam and oxygen, but instead of igniting a fuel grain, this superhot gas is allowed simply to vent through the chamber nozzle. This alone should produce 10,000lbf (45kN) of thrust, sufficient with the Eurofighter jet (20,000lbf/90kN) to take Bloodhound through the sound barrier to about 850mph.

Into the sky

All this has me wondering, though. What would happen if you pointed the car towards the sky. How high could it get?

"We've worked that out with some children in a school project," says Mark Chapman. "They were doing Newton's laws, F=ma. That kind of thing. With the full fuel burn onboard, Bloodhound got to 25,000ft and broke the sound barrier at about 17,000ft. It was a kid that asked that question. How high will it go? Fantastic."

Although, we should stress that a huge amount of design effort has gone into making sure this vehicle stays flat on the ground.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 42.

    Brilliantly creative engineering, teamwork and organisation got Thrust SSC to the land-speed record last time. People design and make things, not countries and not computers. Britain is now massively short of engineering talent, we need projects like this to inspire. This it will be huge benefit to the UK. we need to learn to be creative again, to design and build- not just bean-count & consume.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 41.

    Back in the days of Thrust SSC, the team approached the Government for financial support, and after explaining the purpose of the project. The question came back: "How big is your production run and what do you envisage your profit margin to be?" !!!!!!!

    Does this question apply to the Bloodhound too? How many shall we see on the M1 in the future?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 40.

    I fail to see any worth in this project beyond there being an element of it being nice to be the first person to do whatever - but I just cannot see any remotely likely spin off that could come from this work......am I being thick or this just something tha appeals only to petrol heads?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 39.

    " I would love these guys to get heavily involved in private space missions for the UK".

    Get real, this is old technology, second hand jet engines, petrol engine, hybrid solid fuel rocket. It's not rocket science. Blue streak had 12 times as much thrust in the 1970's. We had the chance then and threw it away. This lot are just playing.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 38.

    I would love these guys to get heavily involved in private space missions for the UK. The government has long declared they do not see a future in their budgets for putting humans into space
    We need private enterprise of get involved, heck even with a little bit of public money, nothing is more inspiring than space

    Imagine it. First man to drive at 1,000mph to become the first true brit in space?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 37.

    “32. JonathanB It is not very green, is it?”

    Glad someone spotted that, note to project: British Racing Green please.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 36.

    I notice that you say gasses produced by the oxidization of your fuel are steam and oxygen--- surely this should read steam and carbon dioxide,perhaps also carbon monoxide? Otherwise good luck to you,no research is pointless otherwise we`ed be still huddling around fires of animal dung.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 35.

    Go Bloodhound!

    Go away Eddy from Waring

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 34.

    When I provided research on Thrust SSC and when it made its record breaking run. I remember that Andy Green was driving what was more like a speed boat than a car as the noise and shock-wave turned desert surface into a fluidized bed and thus car was floating aerodynamically on what effectively a fluid surface with zero adhesion.
    How does the Bloodhound team propose to overcome these effects?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 33.

    Brilliant British engineering and design !!!
    Why are Richard Noble and Andy Green not "Sirs" yet when bankers get knighted for failure?

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 32.

    It is not very green, is it?

    Engineering and science need to solve the actual problems the world is facing not waste time on boys toys.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 31.

    If this project does inspire our kid to become scientists, engineers or maths graduates then it is a good thing. This country needs something to combat media events like x factor which seem to have given rise to a generation of youngsters whose ambition is to be famous, and not famous for any practical reason, just famous.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 30.

    They can do what they like, it's their money, but please don't pretend this is anything other than a big boy's toy. It's the type of thing we British are good at, our men in sheds build things like this which have no practical purpose or application to boost their own egos. It would be better if they tried to invent something useful - they might just end up rich and employing lots of people.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 29.

    It's interesting that the Blue Streak Project was mentioned. That was cancelled partly because it was too expensive for a whole country to maintain. Now we have "men in sheds" doing similar things. Don't forget that there are two sides to innovation:
    1) Do new stuff
    2) Do old stuff cheaper.

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 28.

    Hybrid rocket engines not new, this is backward thinking Guinness book of records nonsense. No commercial/military use. In fact none of these rockets on wheels have any use other than stunts to pretend to show we have better technology. "What would happen if you pointed the car towards the sky?" Seriously, How about F for state of nation, M for money wasted and A for who you are. It's a snobs toy.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 27.

    Why is it that in the UK we have to find private funds for anything more technical than a wind-up alarm clock? We excel in the sciences and engineering, and could lead the world in these industries

    Doubtless the politicians will come out of the woodwork to bask in the trumphant glow of the Bloodhound team's success and any off-shoot technological advances

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 26.

    We need more and bigger and better equipped sheds. We're currently stuck up a creek without a paddle because we've become dependent on a single source of energy. Anything that builds our capacity to do transport R&D must be applauded and encouraged. I also stifle a yawn at the specific target of this research but if it fires the imagination of our future engineers, more power to Bloodhound.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 25.

    An excellent showcase for engineering talent being applied in an extreemly visibe manner.

    Just as F1 introduces, makes reliable and inspires people to work on new technologies this will encourage the innovation that we are always in desperate need of.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 24.

    As an engineer and a physicist student, I find this project very interesting. It shows that this country has retained it's "men in sheds" innovation and pioneering skills, it has always had. Without such projects, we would have never had transatlantic flights, or gone to the moon etc Good luck to everyone involved with the Bloodhound project.

  • rate this
    -8

    Comment number 23.

    For me,he only impressive thing about this is the nerve of the would-be driver.

    It's probably one of the more expensive forms of suicide, but at least it will probably sort out the cremation at the same time.

 

Page 1 of 3

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.