Viewpoint: Should we send humans to Mars?

 
Mars exploration

Related Stories

In the second instalment of his two-part feature on human missions to Mars, Dr Alexander Kumar - who has been overwintering at Concordia Station, Antarctica - asks whether we should send people to the Red Planet given our poor record managing this one. Read the first part here.

Much like the interior of Antarctica, Mars remains inhospitable.

For humans to live on the planet for any significant period of time would require the recycling of water and air, along with other so-called "life systems".

At Concordia station in Antarctica (my current home) we use "grey water recycling" - taking the water generated from domestic activities such as laundry, bathing and dishwashing and recycling it on-site for other uses. This mirrors the system used on the International Space Station (ISS).

But there are even grander ideas that could further extend the duration of human habitation on Mars.

Whether or not we find Martian life, there is a long-standing wish to "terraform" the Red Planet. This would involve artificially transforming the climate and surface to enable humans to live there without life support systems.

In his Mars Trilogy, science fiction author Kim Stanley Robinson documents the process of inhabitation and colonisation, causing a chain of events that turn the Red Planet into a green one and later a blue world.

A human presence on Mars will inevitably change the environment. It was HG Wells who first identified the possibility of humans unknowingly "spoiling" other distant planets through bio-contamination - bringing their bacteria and other potential microbial colonists with them.

I believe the lessons we have learnt in the past century through polar - and in particular Antarctic -exploration and science are very relevant. Our delicate polar regions are continually threatened by climate change and so often used to forecast and track the state of our planet.

Mr Robinson maintains that when it comes to investigating the challenges of sending a manned mission to Mars "Antarctica is the best analogue, not the Wild West or anything else".

Contaminating Mars

John Ash from the Scott Polar Research Institute commented: "Forward contamination is a critical factor in space exploration, and much may be learned by the work being done in connection with the penetration of Antarctica's hidden ice lakes. Of course, it is critical not to contaminate samples that may offer scientific proof of extraterrestrial life; but there are also legal obligations."

He is referring to the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies.

Ray Bradbury In Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles, humans take refuge on Mars

Alongside the potential for "forward" contamination, our own contamination of the new, previously undisturbed environments we visit, there is the potential of "backward" contamination also.

There are many other ideas - methods employed by past polar explorers using a depot system to cross Antarctica's empty, hostile and unknown interior, could be adapted to a manned mission to Mars, where a series of supply depots could be laid in orbit between Earth and Mars, accompanied by sending reserve supplies equipment into Mars' orbit or to a planned landing site on its surface.

Like the polar expeditions led by Amundsen, Scott and Shackleton, this would add a factor of safety, reassurance and ability to resupply and makes repairs en-route, for the brave crew travelling into the unknown.

Over the coming decades, there could be another call for astronauts, this time for a manned mission to Mars. Similar to Ernest Shackleton's fabled newspaper advertisement, with Nasa's recent budgetary cuts, recruitment for an interplanetary mission's crew might also spell out: "Men and women wanted for hazardous journey, small wages, bitter cold and long months of complete darkness."

The late science fiction writer Ray Bradbury left us with an echoic and stern warning in his story The Martian Chronicles where the colonisation of Mars becomes a necessity for human survival - with humans fleeing a troubled, broken and atomically devastated home planet Earth.

If our species follows its current course, a biblical apocalypse could be a potential outcome.

Extinction event

In describing the possibility of standing on the surface of Mars himself, Tim Peake tells me: "It would be the most exhilarating feeling imaginable."

He adds: "At some point, hopefully many, many years in the future, the Earth will suffer an event that human life cannot tolerate - that is to say, an extinction event.

"If mankind is to survive as a species then in the long term our future existence lies in colonisation of other planets or moons. I believe this is something that can be achieved, but it will require many years of progressive steps before we are capable of colonisation.

Concordia Research at remote outposts such as Concordia may yield lessons for future missions to Mars

"We live on a fragile planet in a highly dynamic Universe, so manned exploration of space is not just about our quest for knowledge but also an insurance policy for the future."

Many sceptics will undoubtedly question why any country would choose to invest in future space exploration, including a manned mission to Mars, while there are so many unsolved problems on our planet, from HIV to malaria to poverty.

They would be absolutely correct. Trust me, I'm a doctor who has travelled far and wide, and have witnessed the worst effects of poverty, disease and war.

The last words of Captain Robert Falcon Scott, addressed to the public in his diary, echo loudly: "For God's sake look after our people."

Sitting in Antarctica 100 years on, dreaming of Mars, I would update Scott's advice by factoring into his equation, the impact (unbeknown to him) of humans on Earth over the past century.

I would reiterate: "For God's sake, look after our people…. and also our planet."

Caring is sharing

Should we be so frivolous by our excessive nature, and be trusted to visit, contaminate and perhaps colonise another planet when we seem so incapable of conserving and looking after our own home world?

Maybe this continuing lack of care for the planet and its people will one day become the reason we leave Earth for once and for all.

However, alongside my experiences as a doctor, I also travel the world as a scientific explorer.

On a large lonely wooden cross on top of a hill in Antarctica, overlooking a route taken to the South Pole, someone inscribed the words "to strive, to seek, to find and not to yield".

These words, borrowed from Sir Alfred Tennyson's Ulysses poem, had been left by the party who located Scott's tent in memory of the expedition team's legacy.

Among them, my own hero, the doctor Edward Wilson, whose dreams did not become a graveyard leave a blazing trail and legacy of science to inspire future generations.

Only by pushing mankind to its limits, to the bottoms of the ocean and into space, will we make discoveries in science and technology that can be adapted to improve life on Earth.

If the origin of life as we know it arose from a Big Bang in a distant area of the Universe, perhaps the solutions we seek to our problems on Earth may also lie there.

Failing to strive, seek or find would be an even greater tragedy - and represent a giant leap backwards for mankind.

You can follow Doctor Alexander Kumar's current experiences in Antarctica at his website.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 389.

    What on "earth" for? Haven't we done enough damage to this beautiful planet to know beyond any doubt whatsoever that we should stay where we are and put things right with our home? What's the justification for colonising Mars? Let me guess, we want to continue along our stupid path of wanton consumerism but we're running out of resources here, what damned fools propose this? Idiots all!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 388.

    It is human nature to explore and colonise. The Moon, Mars and the Solar System are the next steps for humans to exercise that nature.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 387.

    Our Government appears to already be living on another planet!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 386.

    Excellent opportunity. A penal colony for murderers - 'life on Mars'

    As long as we don't get our government to run things or we'd be dithering about where to build the runway to land on 25 years from now.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 385.

    #380 Little_Old_Me
    "How many trips are thinking would be needed? I'd love to be convinced but I am an economist first & foremost & am still struggling to see the numbers adding up."

    The trouble is that its impossible to know how the numbers will add up until its tried, I think thats one of the main reasons why we arent already working on it. How many trips? ~10 to 20 with 2 or 3 large vehicles

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 384.

    Has anyone checked with the Martians whether they want Tourist's from the third planet. We have already littered the surface of their planet with metal debris without their permission.

    Next it will be illegal immigrants sneaking in on the landing section of our space ships.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 383.

    Only when we have learnt how to look after Earth well should we consider seeding other planets with humans. Could be a while.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 382.

    Pehaps we should send the non humans....then the humans with common sense can get on with their lives ...i suggest a prison in the sky then we can make good use of the prison land here on earth.....i also think parlement, royalty, all government run bodies, do gooders, human rights campaigners and jamie oliver should reside there permantley. We could rename earth utopia then

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 381.

    Socialists could be deported and they could tax the people of Mars.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 380.

    378.Robert Lucien - ".....My figures may be seen as like a builders first estimate, it may cost a little more and take a little longer but then it may not. .."


    How many trips are thinking would be needed? I'd love to be convinced but I am an economist first & foremost & am still struggling to see the numbers adding up.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 379.

    NO NOT HUMANS POLITICIANS AND BANKERS ASAP,SO WE HUMANS CAN FIX PLANET EARTH.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 378.

    372.Little_Old_Me
    True they are just guesses. Based on the scaling up to 1000 ton payload to LEO rockets (similar designs to Sea Dragon or GCNR Liberty) and assembly in orbit. With everything else based on that tech and a reuseable Earth Mars delivery system.

    My figures may be seen as like a builders first estimate, it may cost a little more and take a little longer but then it may not. ..

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 377.

    Can someone please show us where these figures of the cost being a few or several Billion to establish a small colony on Mars come from?

    I can't believe they are true, but am willing to change that view if the evidence stacks up.

    The sheer volume of restocking trips requried alone would surely cost more than that, let alone transporting some sort of flat pack biome for them to live in......

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 376.

    @373

    The UN number is just an example - there are other studies which show a similar thing, e.g. NASA's. My point is, it's widely held that we need the resources of space.

    Bottom line: when we run out of a resource on Earth, the only other place to find a supply is OFF Earth. And there's no way we can change that equation.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 375.

    367.Pancha Chandra
    You sum the whole point up superbly. Consolidate rather than speculate vast resource that will add further to the earth's dilemma.
    Could you try explaining that to the government of India who despite accepting aid from the UK for feeding the impoverished then blow it on space shots and arms?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 374.

    In the spirit of human exploration then I say absolutely yes.

    However, with the limited $budget available it's hard to argue against robotic probes that can explore not only Mars but the moons of Saturn, Jupiter and beyond.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 373.

    ok moderator, spit the pips out of this!
    364.bengate
    The UN or more specifically Useless Nerds , these people cannot even stop a fight in a bar never mind devise a global strategy! The usual politicians, Koffee whatshisname etc, a waste of space! They are all gamblers on bigger and better theme. I would rather concentrate on factors we can influence rather than gambling resource on space shots!!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 372.

    366.Robert Lucien - ".....we could do that for maybe $5 to 10 trillion......its merely a matter of scaling up and refinement to get..(400)"

    "merely"....no merely about it, it would be incredibly difficult, espcially in your timescale.

    Where did you get your figures from? That's the cost of not very many Shuttle flights to the moon.......

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 371.

    #366 Oh flub!!! Before everyone who knows maths jumps on me for the ridiculous number in that post, that should have read 10,000 people sent to Mars. .... :D Useless stupid word dyslexia.

    The costs to send a basic explore and return mission of 5 to 10 people would certainly be less than 100 billion - and easily affordable by either the USA or Europe - or both together + Russia.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 370.

    of course we should. okok it would cost alot but id much rather see tax pennies being spent on something positive rather than war, bank bail out, mps expenses, glory projects like hs2 and a 3rd heathrow runway.

 

Page 1 of 20

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.